Form: Thread

  • DISAMBIGUATING AND CLASSIFYING CIVILIZATIONS. (There are only six types.) Brad s

    DISAMBIGUATING AND CLASSIFYING CIVILIZATIONS.
    (There are only six types.)
    Brad suggested that we develop a more concrete representation of our system of classifying civilizations. So, we did a little bit of work and gave the rules to GPT, and asked the right question and were surprised by the quality of the classification system it produced for us.

    Now, it has a problem with rates of adaptation, because it has some ‘conventional’ bias (that’s false) which, if I work on the prompts I can fix, but this is about right otherwise:

    Civilizational Types Analysis
    So if:
    1) civilization refers to the highest organizing category prior to ‘man’,
    and;
    2) there are only three possible categories of influence, and therefore three categories of elites, and three categories of institutions of coercion:
    (a) force/defense(state/command),
    (b) trade/boycott(economy, tort law),
    (c) inclusion/inclusion (social/moral/religion),
    and;
    3) if the sequence of the development of those institutions causes a path dependence, where the first institution is the dominant, the second less so, and the third weak or failure, then civilization, empire, federation, and state need not correspond to civilization.

    4) So given the path dependence of (a), (b), (c) can produce only six combinations of civilizational structures, we can separate civilizations into six types.

    Force Trade Inclusion,
    Force Inclusion Trade,
    Trade inclusion Force,
    Trade Force Inclusion,
    Inclusion Trade Force,
    Inclusion Force Trade.

    5) Interestingly some of these types cannot survive. More interestingly, it appears that humans have tried all of them and the remaining civilizations do fit the pattern.

    DOMINANT INSTITUTION CIVILIZATIONS

    Force-Dominant Civilizations (FDC)
    Primary Institution: Force/Defense
    Characteristics: Militaristic, centralized power, strong state control.
    Historical Example: Sparta

    Trade-Dominant Civilizations (TDC)
    Primary Institution: Trade/Boycott
    Characteristics: Commercially driven, emphasis on economic policies and trade networks.
    Historical Example: Phoenician civilization

    Inclusion-Dominant Civilizations (IDC)
    Primary Institution: Inclusion/Exclusion
    Characteristics: Social cohesion, moral/religious dominance, communal decision-making.
    Historical Example: Ancient Israel

    THE INSTITUTIONAL SEQUENCES

    Force Trade Inclusion (FTI)
    Description: Begins with strong military focus.
    Characteristics: Centralized power, military strength.
    Rate of Adaptation: Quick adaptation due to trade, moderate innovation.
    Defense and Stability: Strong defense, moderate stability.
    Example: Roman Empire

    Force Inclusion Trade (FIT)
    Description: Prioritizes military and social cohesion.
    Characteristics: Militaristic and socially cohesive.
    Rate of Adaptation: Slower innovation, quick defense adaptation.
    Defense and Stability: Strong defense, high stability.
    Example: Byzantine Empire

    Trade Inclusion Force (TIF)
    Description: Led by commerce, followed by social unity.
    Characteristics: Economically driven, socially unified.
    Rate of Adaptation: High innovation, adaptable economy.
    Defense and Stability: Vulnerable defense, moderate stability.
    Example: Dutch Republic

    Trade Force Inclusion (TFI)
    Description: Commerce-driven with strategic military development.
    Characteristics: Commercially vibrant, militarily capable.
    Rate of Adaptation: High innovation, reasonable defense.
    Defense and Stability: Balanced defense, moderate stability.
    Example: British Empire

    Inclusion Trade Force (ITF)
    Description: Starts with social unity, progresses to trade.
    Characteristics: Socially cohesive, later economic growth.
    Rate of Adaptation: Slow innovation, late defense development.
    Defense and Stability: Weaker defense, high stability.
    Example: Tibetan Empire

    Inclusion Force Trade (IFT)
    Description: Social cohesion leads, then defense, then trade.
    Characteristics: Socially and religiously dominant.
    Rate of Adaptation: Least innovative, slow economic adaptation.
    Defense and Stability: Moderate defense, highest stability.
    Example: Ancient Israel

    Note that all I supplied were the rules and the AI produced the descriptions, characteristics and examples. The correct choice of example was fascinating.

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 01:20:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750327628903444480

  • RT @Psyche_OS: The Christian Church is now officially dead. The final nail is te

    RT @Psyche_OS: The Christian Church is now officially dead.

    The final nail is tens of millions of men, who have tasted unchained hypergamy…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-24 14:05:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750157780646760451

  • RT @SaitouHajime00: @curtdoolittle Because we put merchants and accountants in c

    RT @SaitouHajime00: @curtdoolittle Because we put merchants and accountants in charge to have a easier life, at the cost of a much harder l…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-24 06:05:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750036967637574049

  • RT @WerrellBradley: >>>>>> SOVEREIGNTY <<<<<< Sovereignty must be insured to be

    RT @WerrellBradley: >>>>>> SOVEREIGNTY <<<<<<

    Sovereignty must be insured to be assured, by those who would ensure it.

    Men associat…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 23:07:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749932012448657868

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @DougAMacgregor @DougAMacgregor RE: –“America’s structure wa

    RT @curtdoolittle: @DougAMacgregor @DougAMacgregor
    RE: –“America’s structure was designed in the 1780’s”–
    (BTW: We want to interview you…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 18:33:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749862856760205373

  • RT @Henrik_Palmgren: It’s now coming out that jews at HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid

    RT @Henrik_Palmgren: It’s now coming out that jews at HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid society) are organizing the ongoing third world invasion o…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 15:15:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749813183303610548

  • RT @AshaLogos: One of the most demoralizing and exhausting elements of modernity

    RT @AshaLogos: One of the most demoralizing and exhausting elements of modernity, of that type of parasitism and corruption that now so qui…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 15:12:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749812411811643487

  • ANOTHER OF THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUES OF DECEIT (Additional methods requested from t

    ANOTHER OF THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUES OF DECEIT
    (Additional methods requested from the readers)
    From the “If you can name a thing you can destroy a thing.”

    SUBHEADING VIII. SOCIAL SEDITION (Capital Destruction)
    1. Erasing: :Mnemolysis”: Anti-Mnemonic: Etymology of Mnemonic:… https://twitter.com/WerrellBradley/status/1749578275524059328


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-22 23:59:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749582588845367343

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 Staying on message: 1

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://t.co/BgLLPZ2cFs

    Staying on message:
    1 – Not all peoples are equally disposed to speak truth before face.
    2 – The lower the group’s median IQ the less likely they are able to speak truth before face.
    3 – Some populations must rely on lying to advance their collectivist religious social and politcal systems (the abrahamic cults)
    4 – Truth before face is, aside from individual self determination (sovereignty), the single most important civilizational difference between the west (whites) and the rest.

    Why? Because every single institution we value and that provides us with such a competitive advantage, and provides such a higher standard of living and quality of life, depends on it – the origin of our law, or our empiricism of our science, arts, technoligy and medicine, especially our liberty and jurty and common concurrent law – all depend on this one foundation: truth before face regardless of cost.

    And what is the left advancing? Collectivism and Lying instead. In other words cultural suicide.

    And why are women so eager to advance collectivism face before truth and ly ing to cover it?

    Because it absolves them of responsibility for defense of the behavioral commons. And women evade responsibility as much as they pursue attention and consumption. Training women to not rely on antisocial behavior is just as important if not more important than training men not to. and that’s what we have failed to do.

    Now back to the paper:

    As if we needed more evidence. The only people on earth who speak truth before face. And the entire left’s program is meant to undermine it – as is nearly every woman in the west :(. ) It’s a paper by Kirkegaard with his usual zeal.

    –“Research shows that honesty correlates positively with intelligence. Similarly, there are racial differences in honesty, with Europeans being more honest than various other ethnic groups. It is currently unknown to what degree race differences in intelligence can explain the differences in honesty. …

    We replicate prior findings that honesty correlated with measures of intelligence (r = .38, 95% CI [.34, .41]) and that Blacks (d = -0.67, 95% CI [-.76, -.59]) and Hispanics (d = -0.4, 95% CI [-.50, -.31]) are less honest than Whites, and this holds whether honesty is measured by self-reports, interviewer-reports or by parent-reports.

    In addition, race differences in honesty remained between Blacks and Whites but not between Whites and Hispanics after controlling for intelligence. Differences between Blacks and Whites but not Whites and Hispanics were noticeably lower in self-reports (Blacks: d = -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11], Hispanics: d = -0.24 [-0.31, -0.17]) than parent-reports (Blacks: d = -0.43 [-0.52, -0.35], Hispanics: -0.24 [-0.33, -0.15]) and interviewer-reports (Blacks: d = -0.7 [-0.75, -0.64], Hispanics: -0.3 [-0.36, -0.25]).

    Cross-national comparisons were made using national IQ data and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Bayesian model averaging suggests that Hofstede’s individualism dimension (β = .64, PIP = 100%), national IQs (β = .25, PIP = 73.6%), and masculinity (β = -.35, PIP = 100%) predict differences in honesty between countries.

    (CD: Meaning? Collectivism breeds dishonesty.)

    Parking violations per diplomat were only predicted by national IQs (r = -0.28, p < .001), given that no other variable reached a posterior inclusion probability above 0% besides national IQs. Implications and theories concerning these findings are discussed.”–

    (CD: I’m going to fetch that data on parking violations per diplomat and add it to my Countries table of data.)

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748141273679073280

  • RT @aldafa_ir: @curtdoolittle @Wrigsted @maninlowcastle @TuckerCarlson Lira is b

    RT @aldafa_ir: @curtdoolittle @Wrigsted @maninlowcastle @TuckerCarlson Lira is becoming the rights George Floyd, both sides choose terrible…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 18:34:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746239305989726591