Form: Thread

  • 1 – IQ produces many incremental ‘goods’ (morality, cooperation, adaptation, inv

    1 – IQ produces many incremental ‘goods’ (morality, cooperation, adaptation, invention, cost of learning)

    2 – Neoteny/Pedomorphism/Juvenilization produces lower rate and depth of maturity, more aquiline features, longer development times, and greater ‘distance’ from impulses.

    3 – The balance between the male brain and the female brain produces behavioral differences. Populations vary in this distribution of biases, just as they vary in the distribution of maturity. (Climate and disease gradients largely determine this.)

    4 – Asymmetric reproduction (upward reproduction) improves these conditions, and symmetric reproduction does the reverse. Hence why cities are dysgenia-factories.

    5 – ‘Something wonderful happened’ either before (black sea) or when we combined horse, wheel, and bronze. But it ‘appears’ that the black sea -caspian created a rapid recursively improving gene pool. Same with yellow river. Most but west and far east were also isolated.

    6 – So the answer is that when the original people moved west into poland and germany, and developed a trading civilization among the north sea baltic peoples that they already possessed a genetic and possibly cultural advantage.

    7 – The roman empire destroyed celtic civilization (as they did carthaginian and east mediterranean), which appears to have been the ‘core state’ of europe – and created opportunity for the high germanics to migrate, and eventually conquer rome.

    8 – Now, nordic peoples practiced a form of late marriage and manorialism for a long time, possibly ‘always’. But by 700 the people of the low countries institutionalized it, and this formalized reproductive eugenics. Bipartite manorialism is demarcated by the Hajnal Line.

    9 – Beginning with the redevelopment of major trade lines, about 1000, and certainly by the establishment of the Hansa in 1200, europeans started aggressively hanging ‘troublemakers’.

    10 – downward movement of middle class reproduction meant that by the late medieval/early modern period much of european population above the Hajnal line was genetically middle class. Add literacy, and redistribute the dead capital in the church hands – and magic happened.

    11- So it appears that the advantage is genetic and long standing, but is amplified substantially by (a) heroic culture, and (b) culling of the underclass through systemic eugenics, starvation, war, and disease.

    12 – Ergo, the underclasses were not ‘oppressed’. They were domesticated like any other animal, and the untrainable one’s ‘removed from the breeding pool’. And we have reversed those IQ gains in just 150 years.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-31 16:41:00 UTC

  • Social Science:1) That which can be explained by incompetence need not be attrib

    Social Science:1) That which can be explained by incompetence need not be attributed to malice. 2) That which an be explained by signaling, need not be attributed to honesty. 3) That which can be explained by self interest, need not be attributed to morality. Man acts rationally.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 15:59:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978662777719066625

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @PsychRabble

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972835911569477632


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972835911569477632

  • (Representative multi-party democracy forces us to vote by moral intuition rathe

    (Representative multi-party democracy forces us to vote by moral intuition rather than on individual policies.Excessive scale forces us to monopolies rather than many custom polities producing commons appropriate for the demographic.) Heterogeneity is only useful in small doses.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 14:55:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978646578457178112

    Reply addressees: @Le_Old_Right @corradossc @JonHaidt @JamesADamore

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978614441498439681


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978614441498439681

  • 2)Cosmopolitanism(political communism) has failed everywhere its tried, just as

    2)Cosmopolitanism(political communism) has failed everywhere its tried, just as has economic communism(socialism), and legal communism (libertarianism).Yet people pursue heterogeneous polities despite only homogenous polities exiting poverty, corruption, low trust, and tribalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 14:52:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978645888171167745

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978597888417783809


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978597888417783809

  • 1) Markets allow competing groups to collaborate on means, even if they pursue o

    1) Markets allow competing groups to collaborate on means, even if they pursue opposing ends. Classical Houses of classes create a market. Democracy creates a monopoly by eliminating the market for commons between the classes, and forcing conflict into the informational commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 14:50:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978645347571511296

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978597888417783809


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978597888417783809

  • 1 – CLASS: Let’s say you have a population distribution with a median of what we

    1 – CLASS: Let’s say you have a population distribution with a median of what we consider 100 (european average). Now either remove people below 100, or cut one child from the lower half and increase one child of the upper half. Curve shifts right despite regression to mean.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-26 04:57:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978133914861686784

    Reply addressees: @AdversityGift @primalpoly @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978132366332866560


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978132366332866560

  • 8 – Why can we do it easily? Because (really) all truth sounds the same, and all

    8 – Why can we do it easily? Because (really) all truth sounds the same, and all falsehood sounds different. The problem is that falsehood is, like sugar and spice, more entertaining, and goes down easier.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:29:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976979260702449664

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976979016489013248


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 7 – So just as a sculptor can build a bust out of clay, or he can carve one from stone, we can find what is true, by carving away, even if we can’t find it from building it up. … Now, can you do this? Yes, and with practice, pretty easily.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976979016489013248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 7 – So just as a sculptor can build a bust out of clay, or he can carve one from stone, we can find what is true, by carving away, even if we can’t find it from building it up. … Now, can you do this? Yes, and with practice, pretty easily.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976979016489013248

  • 7 – So just as a sculptor can build a bust out of clay, or he can carve one from

    7 – So just as a sculptor can build a bust out of clay, or he can carve one from stone, we can find what is true, by carving away, even if we can’t find it from building it up. … Now, can you do this? Yes, and with practice, pretty easily.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:28:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976979016489013248

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976978477978091525


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 6 – Now, we can’t ever be certain that very much about anything complicated is completely true, but we can eliminate so much of what people say that very little remains.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976978477978091525


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 6 – Now, we can’t ever be certain that very much about anything complicated is completely true, but we can eliminate so much of what people say that very little remains.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976978477978091525

  • 6 – Now, we can’t ever be certain that very much about anything complicated is c

    6 – Now, we can’t ever be certain that very much about anything complicated is completely true, but we can eliminate so much of what people say that very little remains.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:26:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976978477978091525

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976977130688000002


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 5 – But others can and have been able to afford that measurement and testing. So the question is, how can we test the words, measurements, and tests of others who were able to afford the patience, time, energy, and cost?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976977130688000002


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 5 – But others can and have been able to afford that measurement and testing. So the question is, how can we test the words, measurements, and tests of others who were able to afford the patience, time, energy, and cost?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976977130688000002

  • 5 – Now, it turns out that just as we can measure things with mathematics, or sc

    5 – Now, it turns out that just as we can measure things with mathematics, or scales, or volumes, and we can measure the logical consistency of sentences, and we can write programs, we can also learn how to ‘measure’ what people say – such that we can tell if it’s false. …


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:25:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976978186901868544

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345