Curt Doolittle

Form: Thread

  • RT @ScottAdamsSays: Colleges are being managed by our stupidest citizens

    RT @ScottAdamsSays: Colleges are being managed by our stupidest citizens.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 12:42:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782389545880703181

  • RT @GadSaad: The West can NEVER recover from its death spiral unless it recogniz

    RT @GadSaad: The West can NEVER recover from its death spiral unless it recognizes:
    1) It is perfectly fine to criticize any religion; no r…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 11:55:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782377707612852352

  • RT @elonmusk: Time to make crime illegal again

    RT @elonmusk: Time to make crime illegal again

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 11:53:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782377171815669928

  • Topic: Why We Know We’re Right, And Physics Finally Knows Why It’s Wrong. 😉 To:

    Topic: Why We Know We’re Right, And Physics Finally Knows Why It’s Wrong. 😉

    To: NLI Followers, All;

    You know, I’m doing a bit more work on the foundations of physics again (explaining the ternary logic of evolutionary computation), and the nagging little voice in the back of…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-19 17:44:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781378426785431609

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @sudovatnik @GearMentation @RokoMijic My work uses Constructi

    RT @curtdoolittle: @sudovatnik @GearMentation @RokoMijic My work uses Constructive Operationalism, or a constructive logic of operational t…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-18 11:07:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780916136558694678

  • RT @AutistocratMS: @RokoMijic @curtdoolittle Yes and we refer to the work as nat

    RT @AutistocratMS: @RokoMijic @curtdoolittle Yes and we refer to the work as natural law now, propertarianism being only subdiscipline conc…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-18 03:36:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780802509390393798

  • IT’S ALL WORD SALAD TO YOU? This is why my writing looks like word salad to you:

    IT’S ALL WORD SALAD TO YOU?
    This is why my writing looks like word salad to you:

    1) It’s much closer to mathematics and programmatic logic than it is to ordinary english. In fact it’s ‘a formal operational logic’ meaning a lot like programming.

    2) All technical fields prevent ambiguity and confusion by using terms specific to the context. (again, my work is much closer to programmatic logic) In effect instead of analogies, technical fields use terms as the equivalent of names or measurements.

    3) There is a presumption among ordinary people that ethical, moral, and legal language should be composed in ordinary language – despite that ordinary language is ambiguous, loaded, framed, and full of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    So, if instead, I wrote everything in algorithmic prose using legal document structure, then you would not assume that you would understand it.

    Can you read the law? Can you read software programs? Do you understand the foundations of mathematics? Of language and grammar? Of cognitive science? Of Economics? Of course you don’t. But do you criticize them for their ‘word salad’? Yet, I use concepts from all those fields and many others.

    But because enough people DO understand my work (our work at the institute since it’s more than just me), and because I don’t want to ‘scare people off’ by using math, formal logic, or formal operational logic (programming), I write as I do, and people either stick around to learn or they don’t.

    This strategy serves as a filtering system to keep away people who lack the capacity (and degrade the conversation) and encourages those that do (that improves the conversation).

    I’ve been a public intellectual for over a decade now, and the ‘word salad’ accusation is the equivalent of claiming calculus is false because it’s hard’. Yes my work is hard. It takes work to understand.

    So does every other scientific discipline. ‘)

    -Hugs

    Reply addressees: @PlayerJuan96

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 20:57:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779977315553890304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779947987919356371

  • (Testing the Waters) (edited) Ok. So let’s test the waters here on X-Twitter for

    (Testing the Waters) (edited)
    Ok. So let’s test the waters here on X-Twitter for a moment:

    1) Ethics: Most people who recognize my name are aware of my work on ethics (Propertarianism). https://t.co/5oLb3zSN1P

    2) The Law: Some people are aware of my work on the constitutional, legal and policy reforms. https://t.co/yBqWDutcs1

    3) The Logic:Operationalism: Some people are aware of my work on formal operational logic and language: https://t.co/CG2v1iy6n8
    The Method Videos:
    https://t.co/9E7IntFgcr

    4) The Science: Few people are aware of my work on cognitive science and behavior. More people that I expected are aware of my work on sex differences in cognition, deception, and warfare. And even more than I ever expected are aware of my work on group evolutionary differences and how those differences make use of sex differences in warfare. https://t.co/cKQJpfRObe
    The foundation series (cognitive science) videos: https://t.co/ib3v3XLlIc…

    5) The History: I’m only half done with my work on evolution of man, and human history, so I don’t mention it at all other than to reference some work on the speciation events that created the races. I doubt anyone knows of it.
    https://t.co/c6sqBWTO7d

    6) The Prosecution: On the other hand, I have not promoted my work on ‘the prosecution of the enemy’. Because well, it’s pretty damning and it’s a taboo subject. But all those terrible things you would like to know about the “bringers of conflict” are covered in it. https://t.co/U4b9s8k8LY…
    The Choice Series Videos:
    https://t.co/nt1KX8Ao8Q

    7) Civil War: And I don’t publish my work on ‘The course and conduct of a civil war’ – because well, the FBI has asked (threatened) me not to inspire others to action. Precisely because I do know how to cause and conduct that war. (no link)

    So, why did I publish this list?
    (a) do you see the scope of this project? Now do you understand why it’s taking me so long? 😉 Good. 😉
    (b) Well, in case you made it this far, and in case you care, so that you might take a brief look at The Prosecution and just how far along it is. 😉
    (c) And to test the sensitivity on the platform to publishing such things even though they are taboos.

    Thank for participating in the experiment. 😉
    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 17:01:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779917872577368064

  • (Testing the Waters) (edited) Ok. So let’s test the waters here on X-Twitter for

    (Testing the Waters) (edited)
    Ok. So let’s test the waters here on X-Twitter for a moment:

    1) Ethics: Most people who recognize my name are aware of my work on ethics (Propertarianism). https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/old-material/reciprocity/

    2) The Law: Some people are aware of my work on the…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 17:01:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779917872933773598

  • (Testing the Waters) Ok. So let’s test the waters here on X-Twitter for a moment

    (Testing the Waters)
    Ok. So let’s test the waters here on X-Twitter for a moment:

    1) Ethics: Most people who recognize my name are aware of my work on ethics (Propertarianism).
    https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/old-material/reciprocity/

    2) The Law: Some people are aware of my work on the constitutional, legal and…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 15:50:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779900108244500906