STEP FOUR https://t.co/Di8YKVR7LB
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:14:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250079867812622336
Form: Thread
-
STEP THREE
STEP THREE https://t.co/cQm34SvVWt
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:09:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250078854074564610
-
STEP TWO
STEP TWO https://t.co/AqGgZL72jZ
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:09:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250078728119607296
-
STEP ONE
STEP ONE https://t.co/kXRLpYwSNj
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:08:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250078475215609863
-
4) There is no via positiva (justificationary) method in philosophy, science, or
4) There is no via positiva (justificationary) method in philosophy, science, or law other than the irrelevant (reductive).
5) P-law is purely falseificationary. It’s just exhaustively falsificationary, and requires warranty and liability.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 00:46:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243701063963889664
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243700649952514055
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K 3) If it is testifiable, then the question is whether it satisfies the demand for infallibility for the context in question. If it satisfies the demand for infallibility within the limits of involuntary restitution, then one has spoken truthfully and reciprocally.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243700649952514055
-
3) If it is testifiable, then the question is whether it satisfies the demand fo
3) If it is testifiable, then the question is whether it satisfies the demand for infallibility for the context in question. If it satisfies the demand for infallibility within the limits of involuntary restitution, then one has spoken truthfully and reciprocally.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 00:45:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243700649952514055
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243700261916413954
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K 2) P-Law tests falsify for ignorance, error, bias, pretense of knowledge, loading, framing, obscuring, fictionalisms, decets (fictions), false promises and frauds. Not to find ideal truth, but to eliminate fraud.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243700261916413954
-
2) P-Law tests falsify for ignorance, error, bias, pretense of knowledge, loadin
2) P-Law tests falsify for ignorance, error, bias, pretense of knowledge, loading, framing, obscuring, fictionalisms, decets (fictions), false promises and frauds. Not to find ideal truth, but to eliminate fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 00:43:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243700261916413954
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243699601397383168
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K 1) It is at the very least truthful (testifiable). It may also be theoretically, ideally, analytically, or tautologically true, and it is almost certainly not false. It is theoretically impossible to construct a testifiable falsehood. I can’t.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243699601397383168
-
1) It is at the very least truthful (testifiable). It may also be theoretically,
1) It is at the very least truthful (testifiable). It may also be theoretically, ideally, analytically, or tautologically true, and it is almost certainly not false. It is theoretically impossible to construct a testifiable falsehood. I can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 00:41:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243699601397383168
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243698206313197569
-
that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. So in P we
… that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.
So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum of those grammars.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:21:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243528455318355973
Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243528355917553664
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726 So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243528355917553664
-
14) And yes. Now that we know we have an accountable doctor – he should run the
14) And yes. Now that we know we have an accountable doctor – he should run the press conference. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-25 18:01:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242874191466106880
Reply addressees: @timeindawater1 @funder
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242873947382833156
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@timeindawater1 @funder 13) So stop being a selfish infantilized millennial coddler and man up to the problem. He can’t simply call them incompetent. He has to put feet to the fire, so that they burn in the public’s eyes, and he can reform them if they don’t reform themselves.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1242873947382833156