Form: Thread

  • The usual argument is communism at home, socialism with extended family, liberal

    The usual argument is communism at home, socialism with extended family, liberalism locally, and rule of law (ethical capitalism) at scale.

    Why? you can’t have the knowledge to do anything else.
    And you create malincentives if you try.

    So liberalism is just misapplication.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 18:57:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312829204388622336

    Reply addressees: @bishkebab4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828812649017344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @bishkebab4 Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear the cost of that payment it’s a good system of ethics – exhaustion of forgiveness will work. It does not scale AT ALL because the info is no longer available to us. ERGO leftism = disinformation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312828812649017344

  • Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear

    Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear the cost of that payment it’s a good system of ethics – exhaustion of forgiveness will work. It does not scale AT ALL because the info is no longer available to us. ERGO leftism = disinformation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 18:55:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828812649017344

    Reply addressees: @bishkebab4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828555127123970


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @bishkebab4 —” a rational defence of modern leftist ethics,”—

    I answered that already, but I guess it didn’t stick. Apples and oranges. Ethics vs Politics vs Science. It’s a defense of interpersonal social relations that are rationally calculable from direct experience: And Not Commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312828555127123970

  • SCIENCE: 1-There are three human (H.Sapiens) races (subspecies).These subspecies

    SCIENCE: 1-There are three human (H.Sapiens) races (subspecies).These subspecies adapted geographically. Their direction of adaptation is neotenic. Neoteny allows agency (cognitive adaptability), permitting the sequential social, linguistic (cognitive), and technical revolutions.

    SCIENCE: 2-The climate in Africa and the population distribution resisted neotenic evolution. The climate in west Eurasia and distribution accelerated neotenic evolution. The climate in east Asian and limited distribution acclerated neotenic evolution. Groups speciated further.

    SCIENCE: 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE).

    SCIENCE: 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive.

    SCIENCE: 5-The evolution of man is the story of the neotenic self-domestication of man, and the subsequent domestication of territories, plants, animals, metals, chemistry and now physical properties.

    SCIENCE: 6-The standard of living of civilizations is (was until 1950) a measure of the DENIAL of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, with the Europeans practicing the LEAST denial.

    SCIENCE: 7-The Left-Jewish-Islamist counter-revolution is DEVOLUTIONARY resistance to market domestication. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, Islam to reverse evolution. At present only China and the Slavs have the political system and will to resist devolution.

    IF PEOPLE HAVE NOT PASSED THRU SUFFICIENT NEOTENIC DOMESTICATION TO SURVIVE BY NATURAL SELECTION IN MARKETS(IN THE ABSENCE OF IMMIGRATIO) THEN THEY ARE UNFIT FOR WESTERN CIVLIZATION THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE OF WHICH IS EVOLUTIONARY.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-28 13:00:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104942667246281805

  • A Concatenation of Micro Posts

     
     
    1 – My take on history is slightly different, which you’ll see as I publish the next few sets of pieces. That take is correct: European civilization consisted of the holy roman empire of greater Germania, and the innovations that occurred on the fringes of it in Italy, France, England, Scandinavia, and poland. European civilization is taught backward. Just as the world is the victim of the heartland of the steppe, europe is the product of the hearland of germany. Just why this is the case is very interesting. France is second in despotism only to Rome, who she imitated enviously and still tries to. Meanwhile, it was germany that created europe in a thousand tiny nations constantly competing. It was lotharyngian core as a trade route to the north sea, and the north sea after 1000 ad that spread outward. And the age of the atlantic only mattered to EUROPE after the muslim blockade caused the europeans to open world trade in the age of exploration.
     
    2 – Europeanism is the philosophy of fathers, warriors, headmen, kings, emperors and yes, gods, seeking to transform their family, band, tribe, nation, and race into peerage: gods as well. Christianity made it tolerable for the 85% = the peasantry, to survive the ride. But without agrarianism to rule, or manorialism to domesticate, we are reverting rapidly to dysgenia, and reversing five thousand years of evolutionary rapidity to justify democracy. When we should only justify rule of law, by the laws of this universe: physical, cooperative (natural), and evolutionary – as we all seek to defeat the red queen at all stages: local, civilization all, global, solar, galactic, and universal.
     
    3 – Like Hegel in Continental (German) secular theology, all roads of anglo scientific rationalism will end with Propertarianism. Deal with it. I did. I don’t even like it. I don’t want the responsibility. It is what it is.
     
    4 – There isn’t anyone else proposing anything else.
    And there won’t be.
     
    5 – —“I read Kevin Macdonald – haven’t been the same since.”—
     
    Says everyone who’s ever read Kevin MacDonald.
     
    Read Victor Davis Hanson (classical history), Read Buchanan (recent history), MacDonald (Jewish intellectuals, european uniqueness), Duchesne(The History of Thought, european uniqueness), Hicks (Postmodernism), and Doolittle (logic, law, economics, eugenics). And at least DTGTF from Hoppe so you understand why ‘monarchy’, and reduce my workload at convincing you.
     
  • A Concatenation of Micro Posts

     
     
    1 – My take on history is slightly different, which you’ll see as I publish the next few sets of pieces. That take is correct: European civilization consisted of the holy roman empire of greater Germania, and the innovations that occurred on the fringes of it in Italy, France, England, Scandinavia, and poland. European civilization is taught backward. Just as the world is the victim of the heartland of the steppe, europe is the product of the hearland of germany. Just why this is the case is very interesting. France is second in despotism only to Rome, who she imitated enviously and still tries to. Meanwhile, it was germany that created europe in a thousand tiny nations constantly competing. It was lotharyngian core as a trade route to the north sea, and the north sea after 1000 ad that spread outward. And the age of the atlantic only mattered to EUROPE after the muslim blockade caused the europeans to open world trade in the age of exploration.
     
    2 – Europeanism is the philosophy of fathers, warriors, headmen, kings, emperors and yes, gods, seeking to transform their family, band, tribe, nation, and race into peerage: gods as well. Christianity made it tolerable for the 85% = the peasantry, to survive the ride. But without agrarianism to rule, or manorialism to domesticate, we are reverting rapidly to dysgenia, and reversing five thousand years of evolutionary rapidity to justify democracy. When we should only justify rule of law, by the laws of this universe: physical, cooperative (natural), and evolutionary – as we all seek to defeat the red queen at all stages: local, civilization all, global, solar, galactic, and universal.
     
    3 – Like Hegel in Continental (German) secular theology, all roads of anglo scientific rationalism will end with Propertarianism. Deal with it. I did. I don’t even like it. I don’t want the responsibility. It is what it is.
     
    4 – There isn’t anyone else proposing anything else.
    And there won’t be.
     
    5 – —“I read Kevin Macdonald – haven’t been the same since.”—
     
    Says everyone who’s ever read Kevin MacDonald.
     
    Read Victor Davis Hanson (classical history), Read Buchanan (recent history), MacDonald (Jewish intellectuals, european uniqueness), Duchesne(The History of Thought, european uniqueness), Hicks (Postmodernism), and Doolittle (logic, law, economics, eugenics). And at least DTGTF from Hoppe so you understand why ‘monarchy’, and reduce my workload at convincing you.
     
  • 5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french

    5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french revolution and Chinese, perform a thorough purge, (d) update the constitution and therefore common knowledge, so that (e) it doesn’t happen again.

    (I just wanted to do it systematically. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:26:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303127520217366533

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DudeMaximus 4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072

  • 4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) th

    4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:23:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126311423094786


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DudeMaximus 3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against it. The monarchies did. The pre-war countries did. Other countries protect against it. And they use our ‘openness’ exploit this vulnerability in our civilization. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303126311423094786

  • 4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) th

    4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

  • 3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against

    3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against it. The monarchies did. The pre-war countries did. Other countries protect against it. And they use our ‘openness’ exploit this vulnerability in our civilization. …


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:21:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126311423094786

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303125793468489728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DudeMaximus 2) … outside the constitutional framework, because that framework was constrained by guarantees (a) freedom of speech even if fraudulent and harmful, (b) freedom of religion, even if pseudoscientific and harmful, (c) and treason, sedition, and defamation, undermined postwar.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303125793468489728

  • 3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against

    3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against it. The monarchies did. The pre-war countries did. Other countries protect against it. And they use our ‘openness’ exploit this vulnerability in our civilization. …

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus