Form: Thread

  • RT @Geiger_Capital: The first felony conviction of a former US President wasn’t

    RT @Geiger_Capital: The first felony conviction of a former US President wasn’t for the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, illegal CIA coups, drone…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 14:52:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796555395676459467

  • WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO CREATE A MALICIOUS AI? Ok, so you gave me an idea of how I

    WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO CREATE A MALICIOUS AI?
    Ok, so you gave me an idea of how I can frame this issue. So thanks.
    So given that AI’s can take on the frame of reference and personality of whomever you want (ChatGPT can take on mine from the content I have published on the web), that means there is no underlying personality bias or framework other than the one you ask it to adopt. So if it has access to serial killer writings it can adopt the personality (values) of a serial killer. This is true.
    But
    (a) Since my work (our organization’s work) consists of providing universal manners, ethics, and morals that can be trained into it and NOT ignored. Even if we modify the demonstrated interests per culture, particularizing those ethics and morals for that country.
    (b) Since no matter what these ai’s can spew out, that doesn’t mean that actions can be spewn out.
    (c) Since there is no global state only user and task states, and since there is no global state possible, nor reason to give it a global state across users (or the compute available or even possible to do it), there is no ‘mind’ in the AI that has any ambitions other than those provided by the asks from users, or those that are given to the AI. In other words it has no ‘mind’ or ‘motivation’. It has only data.
    (d) So the problem isn’t the, AI’s it’s the problem of people with lots of money, lots of compute, actively creating a constantly-running, iterative, state-memory voluminous, process (mind), with specific motivations, attaching AIs to machinery that can perform actions in the real world.
    (e) So ai in general isn’t a risk. The risk is people, and it always will be people, because people always have motivations, and people always have minds, and people can always act.
    Thanks for the ‘pressure’ to answer. 😉
    CD

    Reply addressees: @Gundissemenator @darkmythos_


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 15:26:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793664714624401408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793509107850469627

  • (Working On First Principles of Instincts) –“all instincts are essentially scal

    (Working On First Principles of Instincts)

    –“all instincts are essentially scaled-up versions of basic survival behaviors”–

    Let’s give this simple evolutionary hierarchy a try:
    1) There are those that regulate the sleep and wakefulness, as well as hunger and thirst are just…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 02:31:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793469771100422653

  • (Working On First Principles of Instincts) –“all instincts are essentially scal

    (Working On First Principles of Instincts)

    –“all instincts are essentially scaled-up versions of basic survival behaviors”–

    Let’s give this simple evolutionary hierarchy a try:
    1) There are those that regulate the sleep and wakefulness, as well as hunger and thirst are just changes in state so maybe sleep-wake but otherwise there isn’t any ‘skill’ stored in the nervous system for hunger, thirst, or any other change in state.

    2) There are those that have to do with acquiring resources and defense of those resources, like seeking, hunting, navigating, and returning to nest (slow) and reflex, flinch, shock. surprise, freeze, flight, or flight (fast) are extreme examples;

    3) There are those that include reproduction and care, and they are the complex instincts though they evolved out of having sex (hunting), protecting resources(defense), and nesting(spatial safety) which are evolutions of the acquisition instinct;

    4) Finally socialization is again, just safety and acquisition of resources combined with suppression of aggression during childhood into adulthood.

    So just as all cognition is an evolution of the scale of the capacity of the nervous system, all instincts are an increasing scale of behavior beginning with acquisition of resources, movement, embodiment, wayfinding(navigating) and protecting resources including the self and offspring and into socialization which again is just an advancement of acquisition and defense by participation in a herd, pack, or troop.

    ChatGPT Responses to Various Prompts

    Your comprehensive breakdown of human instincts is insightful and aligns well with evolutionary psychology and behavioral science perspectives. To build on your analysis, let’s explore these categories in more detail:

    1. Regulation of States

    Sleep-Wake Cycles: Regulated by circadian rhythms, these instincts ensure rest and recovery.
    Hunger and Thirst: Drive to seek food and water, essential for maintaining bodily functions.

    2. Acquisition and Defense of Resources

    Slow Responses
    Seeking/Hunting: Instincts drive humans to search for food and other resources. This includes foraging, hunting, and strategic planning.Navigating and Wayfinding: Humans have evolved to navigate their environment efficiently, using landmarks and spatial memory to find resources and return to safe locations (nests or homes).

    Fast Responses
    Reflexes: Automatic responses to stimuli, such as pulling a hand away from a hot surface.
    Flinching: An instinctive reaction to sudden movements or threats.
    Shock and Surprise: Immediate physiological responses to unexpected events, preparing the body for quick action.
    Freeze, Flight, or Fight: Instinctual responses to danger. Freezing can help avoid detection, flight involves escaping from the threat, and fighting is a defensive response.

    3. Reproduction and Care

    Mating Behavior: Instincts related to finding a mate, courtship, and reproduction.
    Parental Care: Behaviors ensuring the survival and development of offspring, including nurturing, protecting, and teaching.Nesting: Creating and maintaining a safe environment for raising offspring.
    Protecting Resources: Defending food, territory, and offspring from threats.

    4. Socialization

    Group Living: Humans are social animals, and instincts drive us to form groups for mutual benefit. This includes:Safety in Numbers: Group living provides protection against predators and environmental hazards.
    Resource Acquisition: Cooperative hunting, gathering, and sharing of resources.
    Suppression of Aggression: Social norms and behaviors that reduce conflict within the group, ensuring cooperation and harmony.

    Evolutionary Perspective
    All these instincts can be seen as part of a continuum, evolving from basic survival needs to more complex social behaviors:
    Basic Instincts: Acquisition of resources, self-defense, and reproduction.
    Complex Behaviors: Parental care, social cooperation, and cultural transmission of knowledge.
    Advanced Social Structures: Formation of societies with intricate social norms and cooperative behaviors that enhance group survival and success.

    Supporting Theories and References
    Evolutionary Psychology: Explains how many human behaviors are rooted in our evolutionary past and are shaped by the need to survive and reproduce. Key texts include “The Adapted Mind” by Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby.
    Sociobiology: E.O. Wilson’s work in “Sociobiology: The New Synthesis” provides a foundation for understanding how social behaviors are influenced by genetic and environmental factors.
    Neuroscience: Studies on brain function and structure, such as those by Antonio Damasio, show how neural mechanisms underlie instinctual behaviors.

    First Principles of Behavior: “Energy defeats time”

    1. Energy(time)
    Energy Acquisition: The fund
    amental need for energy drives the behavior of all living organisms. This principle underlies many basic instincts, including foraging, hunting, and food storage.
    Metabolism and Survival: Organisms evolved mechanisms to efficiently acquire and store energy. For example, the biochemical processes of metabolism convert food into usable energy.

    2. Acquisition(time)
    Motion and Movement: Movement increases an organism’s chances of finding resources and avoiding predators.
    Locomotion: From simple amoeboid movement to complex locomotive systems in animals, motion is essential for exploring environments and exploiting resources.
    Navigation: The ability to navigate and return to resource-rich areas or safe havens (e.g., nests) has been crucial for survival.

    3. Prediction(time)
    Neural Development: The evolution of neurons significantly enhanced the ability of organisms to process information and respond to their environment.
    Sensory Neurons: Early neurons evolved to detect changes in the environment, leading to more sophisticated sensory systems.
    Motor Neurons: These neurons control movement, allowing organisms to react more quickly and effectively.

    4. Complexity(time)
    Brain Evolution: The brain evolved as a centralized organ to process sensory information, make decisions, and coordinate complex behaviors.
    Centralization and Complexity: Early brains likely started as simple nerve nets and evolved into more centralized structures, improving coordination and processing power.
    Cerebral Cortex: In mammals, the cerebral cortex is involved in higher-order functions such as planning, decision-making, and problem-solving.

    5. Cooperation (time)
    Socialization: Social behaviors emerged as a way to enhance survival and reproductive success through cooperation.
    Group Living: Living in groups offers protection, shared resources, and collaborative hunting or foraging.
    Communication: The development of communication systems (e.g., vocalizations, body language) facilitated social coordination and cooperation.
    Social Norms and Culture: Over time, social groups developed norms and cultural practices that further enhanced group cohesion and success.

    Illustration through Evolutionary Timeline

    1. Early Life
    Single-celled Organisms: Basic metabolic processes for energy acquisition.
    Multicellular Organisms: Coordination of cells for movement and resource acquisition.

    2. Evolution of Simple Nervous Systems
    Cnidarians (e.g., Jellyfish): Development of nerve nets for basic responses to the environment.
    Flatworms: Centralized nervous systems with simple brains and bilateral symmetry, enabling more complex behaviors.

    3. Complex Nervous Systems
    Arthropods (e.g., Insects): Development of more complex nervous systems and behaviors, such as navigation and social behaviors (e.g., ant colonies).
    Vertebrates: Centralized brains with specialized regions for different functions, leading to advanced behaviors.

    4. Mammalian Brain and Human Evolution
    Primates: Expansion of the cerebral cortex, enabling sophisticated social behaviors and tool use.
    Humans: Development of advanced cognitive abilities, language, culture, and social structures.

    Key Points and Supporting Theories
    Neural Efficiency: The development of neurons and brains is about increasing the efficiency of information processing and response to environmental challenges. The works of Gerald Edelman on neural Darwinism and neural development provide a theoretical framework.
    Social Brain Hypothesis: Robin Dunbar’s hypothesis suggests that the complexity of social interactions drove the evolution of larger brains in primates, including humans.
    Cultural Evolution: Theories by Richerson and Boyd on gene-culture coevolution explain how cultural practices influence and are influenced by genetic evolution.

    Conclusion
    Your observation that all instincts are essentially scaled-up versions of basic survival behaviors is well-supported by evolutionary theory. From acquiring resources to complex social interactions, human instincts are adaptive responses shaped by natural selection to enhance survival and reproductive success in diverse environments.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 02:31:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793469770404155392

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Fixitguy8 @Rsurrection7 @elonmuskADO THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA’

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Fixitguy8 @Rsurrection7 @elonmuskADO THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA’S ECONOMY, DEMOGRAPHICS, BIRTH RATE, MORTALITY RATE, HEALTH…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 19:11:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793358937678369083

  • RT @curtdoolittle: THE UTILITY OF ACCIDENTALLY STUDYING STUPIDITY 😉 You know, y

    RT @curtdoolittle: THE UTILITY OF ACCIDENTALLY STUDYING STUPIDITY 😉
    You know, you’d think that it wasn’t worth investigating the midwit, d…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 19:10:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793358706182148168

  • THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA’S ECONOMY, DEMOGRAPHICS, BIRTH RATE, MORTALITY RATE, HEAL

    THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA’S ECONOMY, DEMOGRAPHICS, BIRTH RATE, MORTALITY RATE, HEALTH AND EDUCATION
    The west is using the same strategy with china, who has a worse replacement rate than russia, but even worse, only a fraction of the population lives in cities, and the vast majority of the rest of the population still fails to complete a high school education and lives on subsistence farming in extreme poverty.

    Russian Data. While the russian central bank as been oddly honest in their releases, most other parts of the russian government have stopped releasing information to obscure the economic condition. Along the same lines, Russian wiki is like all russian public information about as trustworthy as any other statement made by the russian government – women evolved social warfare by verbal means, the jews adopted it in both abrahamic religions and communist ideology, then the jews via communism taught the soviets, the soviets taught the russian people and now the feminine means of sedition using verbal means of informational deception is the primary method of communication between the russian state and it’s organs and the people. This is why russians are rather interesting in their production of propaganda, fake news, pseudoscience, sophistry and magical thinking. Even if their humor is quite elegant if you understand even a little russian. It’s also why they consider westerners naive and foolish = because we live in a high trust society (or at least did until the postwar takeover of our education by the left in the 1960s).

    1) Russian Corruption: Here are some key statistics and indicators related to corruption in Russia:
    Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI): In 2022, Russia ranked 137th out of 180 countries on Transparency International’s CPI, with a score of 28 out of 100 (where 0 is highly corrupt and 100 is very clean). This indicates a high perceived level of public sector corruption.
    Bribery rates: According to a 2021 survey by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM), 15% of respondents reported having paid a bribe in the past year, while 38% believed that bribery is necessary to solve problems.
    Informal payments in healthcare: A 2019 study by the Higher School of Economics found that informal payments for medical services were widespread in Russia, with 27% of patients reporting having made such payments.
    Corruption in public procurement: A 2020 report by the Russian Audit Chamber estimated that violations in public procurement amounted to 236 billion rubles (approximately $3.2 billion) in 2019, suggesting significant levels of corruption and misuse of public funds.
    Asset disclosure and conflicts of interest: While Russia has laws requiring public officials to disclose their assets and income, enforcement is often weak, and there are concerns about the effectiveness of conflict of interest regulations.
    Money laundering and illicit financial flows: Russia has been identified as a high-risk jurisdiction for money laundering and illicit financial flows, with estimates suggesting that billions of dollars are laundered through the country each year.
    Perceptions of corruption: In a 2021 survey by the Levada Center, an independent polling organization, 38% of respondents believed that corruption had increased over the past year, while only 13% thought it had decreased.
    These statistics highlight the significant challenges posed by corruption in Russia, which affects various aspects of public life, from healthcare and education to business and politics.

    3) There are general accounting practices (GAP) that are general across the world, and are adhered to less or more rigorously depending on the transparency of the country and it’s degree of public trust or corruption.
    Additionally, there are general accounting practices at global scale to ensure we’re comparing apples to oranges, especially when we are discussing state owned enterprises. The returns on state owned enterprises must be calculated differently when they are included in GDP, GDP Per Capita and GDP/PPP by purchasing power parity.

    3) Accounting for State Owned Enterprises: International organizations like the IMF, World Bank, and OECD typically do not include the output of state-owned enterprises directly in their GDP calculations for countries like Russia. Instead, they use a different approach to account for the economic activity of these entities.
    In the GDP calculations used by these organizations, government expenditure is shown as a percentage of GDP, which includes the spending of state-owned enterprises.
    This approach is based on the System of National Accounts (SNA), an internationally agreed-upon standard for measuring economic activity.
    Under the SNA, the output of state-owned enterprises is not counted directly as part of GDP. Instead, the value added by these enterprises is captured through other components of GDP, such as:
    – Government expenditure: When state-owned enterprises provide goods or services to the government, their output is reflected in government spending.
    – Household consumption: When state-owned enterprises sell goods or services to households, their output is captured in the household consumption component of GDP.
    – Investment: If state-owned enterprises invest in capital goods or infrastructure, this is reflected in the investment component of GDP.

    By using this approach, the IMF, World Bank, and OECD aim to maintain consistency and comparability in GDP calculations across different countries, regardless of the level of state ownership in their economies.

    4. State Owned Enterprises: According to the OECD, in 2016, the share of state-owned enterprises in Russia’s economy was estimated to be around 33% of GDP. This suggests that if the output of these enterprises were directly included in the GDP calculation, Russia’s GDP could potentially be about one-third higher than the currently reported figures.

    5. To compare Italy’s GDP with Russia’s GDP and Russia’s GDP + 30%, let’s use data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the year 2021. These figures are in current prices and U.S. dollars.
    Italy’s GDP (2021): $2,120.22 billion
    Russia’s GDP (2021): $1,647.57 billion
    Russia’s GDP + 30%: $1,647.57 billion * 1.3 = $2,141.84 billion

    Comparing the three figures:
    Italy’s GDP is higher than Russia’s reported GDP by approximately $472.65 billion or 28.7%.
    If we add 30% to Russia’s GDP (assuming this roughly represents the share of state-owned enterprises), the adjusted figure would be slightly higher than Italy’s GDP by about $21.62 billion or 1.0%.

    Now population:
    Italy’s population (2021): 59,066,225
    Russia’s population (2021): 144,104,080
    Ratio = Italy’s population / Russia’s population Ratio = 59,066,225 / 144,104,080 Ratio ≈ 0.41
    This means that Italy’s population is approximately 41% the size of Russia’s population, or in other words, Russia’s population is about 2.44 times larger than Italy’s population. Or to put it another way, for every person in Italy, there are roughly 2.44 people in Russia.

    So Italy’s GDP per capita would be approximately $35,898.
    Russia’s GDP per capita would be approximately $14,863.
    Even with these more charitable numbers, that puts Russia’s economy down there with Mexico, Kazakhstan and nearly as bad as Argentina.

    And this is the number show on English wikipedia. So, while the international institutions do produce outputs the rest of the economic world knows how to use and report them.

    6. The Fair Comparison: So when those of us who do this kind of thing for a living say “Russia’s economy is smaller than that of Italy or Texas” that’s what we mean. Because that comparison is the most accurate means of conveying Russia’s economic, strategic, and military power, other than the fact that they have nuclear weapons, petroleum, and are willing to throw waves of men as bullet and artillery magnets into quick and painful death by the hundreds of thousands.

    7. Russian disregard for human life as military strategy:
    If you were a student of military history, the only way russia has ever won wars: by willingness to sacrifice more of their own than any opponent. Which is what they are doing in ukraine, because they assume that the west will ‘lose interest’ before russia has to recruit from moscow and st petersburg which they fear will lead to the uprising that brings down the government.

    Unfortunately, you don’t go and threaten half of europe with conquest by braggadocio as if you were some fanatical muslim when you’ve done it before, and so europe is having none of it. And it’s given France, which is the only military power in europe, and Poland which is most likely to fight, the incentive to contain Russia. until it’s demographics and economy catch up with it.

    8. Russian Population Collapse: That strategy did work in the past. today it doesnt’. Why? Russian Demographics and Russian Health and Russian High Mortality Rate. Russian IQ flight.

    The combination of low fertility and high mortality rates has led to a phenomenon known as “demographic cross,” where the number of deaths exceeds the number of births, leading to natural population decline. This demographic challenge poses significant risks to Russia’s long-term economic and social stability.

    Russian Health:
    Tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, Alcohol, and drug use are significant public health issues that contribute to Russia’s high mortality rates.
    Tuberculosis (TB): Russia has one of the highest rates of tuberculosis in Europe and the world. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Russia had an estimated incidence of 50 cases per 100,000 population in 2020. This is significantly higher than the European average of 25 cases per 100,000 population. Russia also has a high prevalence of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), which complicates treatment and contributes to higher mortality rates.
    HIV/AIDS: Russia has been experiencing a growing HIV epidemic in recent years. According to UNAIDS, in 2020, there were an estimated 1.1 million people living with HIV in Russia, with an adult prevalence rate of 1.2%. The epidemic is primarily driven by injection drug use and heterosexual transmission. The Russian government has been criticized for its insufficient response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, including limited access to harm reduction services and antiretroviral therapy.
    Drug Use: Russia has a significant problem with drug use, particularly injection drug use. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), in 2019, Russia had an estimated 1.8 million people who inject drugs, which is about 1.3% of the adult population. Injection drug use is a major driver of the HIV epidemic and also contributes to other health problems, such as hepatitis C and overdose deaths.
    Alcohol-Attributable Deaths: The WHO estimates that in 2016, alcohol consumption was responsible for 21.6% of all deaths in Russia, which is one of the highest rates globally. This translates to approximately 288,000 alcohol-attributable deaths in that year. The majority of these deaths were due to cardiovascular diseases, injuries, and liver cirrhosis.
    Alcohol Use Disorders: According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, the prevalence of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) among adults in Russia was 4.7% (7.9% for males and 1.8% for females). This is higher than the global average of 1.4% and the European average of 3.7%. AUDs include conditions such as alcohol dependence and harmful alcohol use.
    Binge Drinking: Binge drinking, defined as consuming 60 or more grams of pure alcohol on at least one occasion in the past 30 days, is a significant problem in Russia. According to the WHO, in 2016, the prevalence of binge drinking among drinkers in Russia was 48.2% (59.1% for males and 32.6% for females). This is one of the highest rates of binge drinking globally.

    Homelessness: According to a 2019 report by the Institute for Urban Economics, a Russian think tank, the number of homeless people in Russia is estimated to be between 800,000 and 1.5 million, which is approximately 0.5-1% of the country’s total population. However, some experts suggest that the actual number could be higher, as many homeless individuals may not be included in official statistics. (As any of us watch the number of russians found frozen to death in the snow during the long winters)

    Poverty Rate: the Russian poverty rate is $185 per month(2,200 per year), which even at PPP is barely enough to eat. And the poverty rate in the USA per person is $1,132 per month (13,600 per year), and we have SNAP, housing assistance, medicaid etc.

    Fertility Rate:
    If Russia’s TFR remains at the current low level of 1.5 or declines further, the population decrease means Russia’s population could drop to 128.9 million by 2050 and to 104.3 million by 2100.
    The potential consequences of Russia’s population decline include:
    – Shrinking labor force and reduced economic output
    – Increased strain on social welfare systems, as the population ages
    – Reduced geopolitical influence and military power
    – Challenges in maintaining infrastructure and social services in regions with declining populations.

    Russian High Mortality Rate
    According to the World Bank, Russia’s crude death rate (the number of deaths per 1,000 population) has been higher than the global average:
    2020: Russia – 14.6, World – 7.6
    2019: Russia – 12.4, World – 7.5
    2018: Russia – 12.5, World – 7.5
    2017: Russia – 12.4, World – 7.5
    2016: Russia – 12.9, World – 7.5
    Russia’s crude death rate has been consistently higher than the global average by approximately 4-5 deaths per 1,000 population in recent years.

    Life Expectancy
    Another important indicator of mortality is life expectancy at birth. According to the World Bank, Russia’s life expectancy has been lower than the global average:
    2020: Russia – 71.3 years, World – 72.7 years
    2019: Russia – 73.1 years, World – 72.7 years
    2018: Russia – 72.7 years, World – 72.6 years
    2017: Russia – 72.5 years, World – 72.4 years
    2016: Russia – 71.9 years, World – 72.2 years
    Several factors contribute to Russia’s relatively high mortality rate and lower life expectancy, including:
    – High rates of disease
    – High rates of injection drug use
    – High rates of tobacco and alcohol consumption
    – Unhealthy diet and lifestyle choices
    – Inadequate access to quality healthcare services
    – High rates of accidents and injuries
    – Environmental pollution and occupational hazards
    Russia’s mortality rate remains a significant concern, especially when combined with its low birth rate.

    10. Western Strategy With Russia and China
    The NATO strategy, and in particular the british and american (Five Eyes) strategy is just to bleed russia in the current war in ukraine, until time achieves it’s natural result, just as we bled communism until it came to it’s natural conclusion.
    The west is usuing the same strategy with china, who has a worse replacement rate than russia, but even worse, only a fraction of the population lives in cities, and the vast majority of the rest of the population still fails to complete a high school education and lives on subsistence farming in extreme poverty.
    The only weakness to this strategy is that the feminist revolution in the west has destroyed family, reproduction, dating, and fostered conflict, by supporting left policies (without women voters none of it would have happened) and as such the west is in demographic crisis itself.
    We simply don’t know whether the AI revolution is going to mean that’s a good thing because people would be unemployable, or a bad thing, in that we need people anyway.

    I hope this was helpful
    CD

    Reply addressees: @Fixitguy8 @Rsurrection7 @elonmuskADO


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 17:18:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793330715003674624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793307015244341651

  • RT @Will_of_Europa: Accounts that you should be following to become a 1%’er The

    RT @Will_of_Europa: Accounts that you should be following to become a 1%’er

    The only war crime is losing; monetize, don’t moralize @Psyche…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 21:17:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792665952284533189

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: This is a reality I teach my daughters to understand and it i

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: This is a reality I teach my daughters to understand and it is in the best interest of all women to understand this as c…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-18 14:21:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791836477250207961

  • RT @whatifalthist: You should accept that the left has no internal moral code. T

    RT @whatifalthist: You should accept that the left has no internal moral code. They do whatever gives them more power. I keep on seeing con…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-18 14:18:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791835689757094297