Curt Doolittle

Form: Sketch

  • PROPHETS WORDS ARE WIELDED ONLY BY THOSE WHO CAN. Western man, like eastern man,

    PROPHETS WORDS ARE WIELDED ONLY BY THOSE WHO CAN.

    Western man, like eastern man, is poly-philosophical.

    UPPER – TRUTH – RULE – FORCE

    1) Aristotle’s Law of truth, The Common Law, and The Martial Law of those who rule: aristocracy.

    MIDDLE – UTILITY – COOPERATION – TRADE

    2) The Host of Middle Class Philosophers myths of aspiration for cooperation,

    3) Aesop and the Nordic, Celtic, and Germanic Myths of household wisdom,

    LOWER – NECESSITY – INSURANCE – GOSSIP

    4) Aquinas and the Nazarene’s philosophy of poverty, suffering, and hope.

    It is not a mystery that these philosophies roughly correspond to the IQ distribution. Both out of ability and out of utility.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 06:19:00 UTC

  • (interesting)(good game everyone should play.) DISTANCE (start) Kin, English, No

    (interesting)(good game everyone should play.)

    DISTANCE

    (start) Kin, English, Northern European, European, Christian, Non-christian, Economist, Scientist. (end)

    BEYOND DISTANCE

    Financier, Entrepreneur. Diplomat. White collar worker, blue collar worker, unskilled worker, ‘the unseen’.

    I realize that I am always an american to non-americans, but I am no longer an american in my metaphysics.

    Incremental suppression, meaning rule of law, has become my cult. Truth in the commons is just the next evolution of suppression.

    Those f__ckers at TRS hooked me into using a meme. lol damn. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 04:28:00 UTC

  • MALE – FEMALE BRAIN DIFFERENCES F: Solipsistic <----> Autistic : M F: Experience

    MALE – FEMALE BRAIN DIFFERENCES

    F: Solipsistic <—-> Autistic : M

    F: Experience <—-> Model : M

    So the ultimate female expression is unfiltered experience, and the ultimate male expression is unfiltered modeling.

    I think that’s the non-diagnostic version of the spectrum.

    I suspect that these are two different axis such that compensate for one another, rather than a single developmental spectrum:

    the intelligence spectrum and solipsistic-autistic spectrum.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 05:36:00 UTC

  • Had a profound insight today quite by accident, and the framing of government as

    Had a profound insight today quite by accident, and the framing of government as ‘reproduction’ (commons) and ‘production’ trade.

    I’m trying to identify the ‘false’ metaphpysical value judgements we rely upon in the west.

    one of them is hard to describe – it’s the tendency of people to think they can step off the train of the world and the train of the world keeps going and they can re-board the train when they understand what’s going on. But that’s not true any more than every time we launch a satellite we slow the earth’s rotation a bit. So there is this concept of stasis to the world that is false.

    The other is what we call the time preference theory of interest – but which is an incomplete statement. Man decreases time to produce, he does not increase production.

    another is the concept of the government as a singular entity other than a hierarchy of necessary functions in order to construct two orders: the order of reproduction, and to facilitate that with the order of production.

    The current system of ‘individual’ government conflates all these processes and is constructed for little more than the systematic destruction of the system of reproduction : the family.

    So, I’m going to keep on this for a bit and see if I can find a narrative that wraps all propertarian metaphysics of cooperation (the story or model of how our human world operates) into something comprehensible.

    If I can do that then the problem of telling a story weaving together the rather numerous ideas in propertarianism and testimonialism will be much easier to distribute to others.

    Right now its just too many ideas without a central narrative.

    The central narrative is that we’re destroying the system of reproduction (family and tribe, and nation-state) and creating a corporation (industrializing human reproduction and production) except it looks like it’s counter productive.

    It is transformative, just like war is, or just like the Chinese did. It’s transformative to industrialize great movements. But once the transformation is complete, you are still stuck with returning to survival, reproduction, and production.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-09 07:18:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT A FALLACY, IT’S A DECEIT. (First Draft) Working through Rallying and Sh

    IT’S NOT A FALLACY, IT’S A DECEIT. (First Draft)

    Working through Rallying and Shaming (which are threats of non-cooperation), through the techniques used against the west, if not against all humans.

    I come up with this hierarchy as a first draft.

    1) Gossiping, Shaming, Rallying (Threatening with non-cooperation)

    2) Loading, Framing, Overloading (Saturation)

    3) Distraction, Half-Truth/Suggestion, Big Lie (Substitution overloading)

    4) Magic, Monotheism, Pseudoscience (loaded and framed big lie)

    5) Interpersonal, Square/Pulpit/Podium, Media (overloaded big lie)

    6) State, Academy and School, Entertainment and Media

    All of which are attacks on the subconscious to force the application of pathological altruism, rather than reason and skepticism.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 14:33:00 UTC

  • LEARNING ABOUT RUSSIAN HUMOR (sketch) They don’t have the tradition of slapstick

    LEARNING ABOUT RUSSIAN HUMOR

    (sketch)

    They don’t have the tradition of slapstick, and so pain isn’t funny – it’s a form of hyperbole. And they don’t generally engage in hyperbole either. (hyperbole is a universal component of american humor.) They don’t think being stupid is funny.And rather than finding humor in the violation of manners that is so common in western humor, people find humor in the violation of the principle of usefulness: futility.

    But, they do think inebriated behavior is funny. And, the theme of ‘cognitive impairment’ is what ties together the most intellectual joke, and the most base: cognitive impairment of ignorance, bias, experience, ego, rule following, or whatever other source can be imagined.

    To some degree this mirrors old english teasing, riddle, trickery, and pranking (my tradition). Although trickery in english humor is a criticism for not paying attention, not a criticism of inescapable and ever-present human stupidity.

    I actually can’t watch american humor because of its slapstick. I don’t find it funny. Worse, it’s stupid and annoying. But most russian humor contains bitter insight into the human condition. And I pretty much always find it funny. Even if it always seems a bit sad or fatalistic.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 06:17:00 UTC

  • X: Utopianism vs Truth vs Deceit , Y: Violence(action) vs Boycott vs Pacifism(In

    X: Utopianism vs Truth vs Deceit ,

    Y: Violence(action) vs Boycott vs Pacifism(Inaction)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-23 01:26:00 UTC

  • True.| ………………| …Possible.| ………………| ..Unknown.| …….

    ………True.|

    ………………|

    …Possible.|

    ………………|

    ..Unknown.|

    ………………|

    ……..False.|

    ________________________________________

    ……………….False -> Unknown -> Possible -> True

    VS

    ……….False…………|………..True

    …….Unknown………|……..Possible

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-22 08:39:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF EMOTIONS (worth repeating) If I am correct, and that all emotions

    THE MEANING OF EMOTIONS

    (worth repeating)

    If I am correct, and that all emotions are reflections in change in state of property en toto, then all statements of experience are objectively describable independent of statements of experience. And differences in experience are differences in evolutionary strategy. And evolutionary strategies can be decided meritocratically.

    This knowledge is as dehumanizing as the insights of Darwin, Copernicus, Galileo, Machiavelli, and Aristotle. That does not mean it is not true. I am just as certain that it is, as they were of their own statements.

    This does not prevent us from making compromises. It merely prevents the state from imposing involuntary compromises upon us.

    The individual cares how he feels Others care how he feels We can learn how someone feels. But we cannot decide a conflict based upon how someone feels. Feelings are a gauge, but a gage of individual demand for acquisition and retention and that is all.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-19 06:54:00 UTC

  • The Evolution of Religion in Technological Context

    12120081_10153732634722264_5123286530232675114_o

    (click to view)