Form: Sketch

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33678440_10156381604887264_15323751

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33678440_10156381604887264_1532375139289661440_n_10156381604882264.jpg THIS ILLUSTRATION IS IMPRECISE

    (a) a “square” describes the shadow truthfully.

    (b) a “circle” describes the shadow truthfully.

    The question is whether one is testifying to the shadow or to the three dimensional object that casts it.

    One CANNOT testify to the shape of the three dimensional object that casts the shadow, one can only testify to the shape of the shadow.

    THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF TESTIMONY (Truth).

    “DO NOT MAKE SHIT UP by INFERENCE.”Philip SaundersI love a good meme prosecutionMay 26, 2018 1:05pmGearóid Walshvery goodMay 26, 2018 1:07pmTrevor BrightmanI have appropriated this meme and description…May 26, 2018 1:37pmChris LavanI’ve always liked the GEB cover…the two objects are objectively different, but depending on how you look at them they look the sameMay 26, 2018 1:41pmGregg MyersMay 26, 2018 1:46pmCurt DoolittleI saw a mother and child (nativity).

    Then I did an image search and … omg… damn. lolMay 26, 2018 1:50pmEdgar BraintreeThat meme is perfect for people with no grasp of rudimentary logic .May 26, 2018 1:57pmCrystal TompkinsMay 26, 2018 2:18pmGregg MyersMay 26, 2018 2:19pmCrystal TompkinsLet’s make it even more abstract hereMay 26, 2018 2:20pmJoao Tiago AlmeidaHa! Said the same about this a few years back on my fb wall :)May 26, 2018 2:38pmChris CantrellInteresting except that in many human interactions a person claims to describe the object based on the shadow. In many cases the person is not aware that what they think they saw was just the shadow and not the actual object. I think you are over logic’ing people’s illogical behavior. From my view the illustration is precise. If deception is added to the equation it gets even more interesting. One can make a true statement while being deceptive.May 26, 2018 3:08pmDann Hopkins@[1071411546:2048:Niall Collins]May 26, 2018 3:24pmGabriel YbarraAngry wing of the Triumvirate assemble!May 26, 2018 4:11pmNoah J RevoyThe problem is that we all should have learned not to assume in kindergarten.May 26, 2018 4:48pmFortis VeroIf you don’t see a simple piece of bread you may have some underlying issues that need to be addressed.May 26, 2018 7:40pmHoward Van Der KlauwSo framing is important.

    Also the image should simply describe all three things as true. None are exclusively truth.May 26, 2018 8:31pmCurt Doolittle(speech is true or false, things are not. This is the problem with our language (the verb to-be). we don’t distinquish between “i state” and “exist as”May 26, 2018 8:32pmCrystal TompkinsI have issues then because I see Jesus in this toastMay 26, 2018 8:32pmHoward Van Der Klauw@[741197263:2048:Curt] true. To restate.

    All three inferred statements of description would be true.

    None precludes the other which is the error of the picture.

    No wonder you banned memes. They waste so much time.May 26, 2018 8:34pmCrystal TompkinsIt was just a jokeMay 26, 2018 9:43pmCrystal TompkinsWEW thank god, I didn’t wanna get into that lolMay 26, 2018 9:45pmCrystal TompkinsShould’ve known since you’re also a Doolittle fan you’re not hugely into abrahamic religionsMay 26, 2018 9:46pmChris CantrellMaybe I am being simple, but I think the image refers to conversation about events, not statements about items. So while the image isnt a solid analogy, it serves the purpose.May 26, 2018 10:16pmDean GeeObjective truth vs subjective truthMay 27, 2018 11:08amCurt DoolittleTruth is true. There is no such thing as subjective truth. Becasue true = decidable.May 27, 2018 11:30amDean GeeWell, there are foundations for logic. Some are based in fact and some are based on the valencies of the individual. Humans need air, objective truth; humans should be treated well, subjective truth.May 27, 2018 3:08pmDean GeeI guess it is the difference between opinion and fact, however both opinion and fact are true, just fact is universally true, and opinion is true to some.May 27, 2018 3:09pmMichael AndradeWhat’s fascinating about this image is that it is unconsciously self-referential; its “shadow” – the lesson readers walk away with – is antithetical to the actual truth we ought to be learning from it.May 28, 2018 1:09amTHIS ILLUSTRATION IS IMPRECISE

    (a) a “square” describes the shadow truthfully.

    (b) a “circle” describes the shadow truthfully.

    The question is whether one is testifying to the shadow or to the three dimensional object that casts it.

    One CANNOT testify to the shape of the three dimensional object that casts the shadow, one can only testify to the shape of the shadow.

    THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF TESTIMONY (Truth).

    “DO NOT MAKE SHIT UP by INFERENCE.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 12:57:00 UTC

  • He Solution to Kevin Mac Donald’s Question of How and Why the Culture of Critique

    (important) (core) 1) Ashkenazis succeeded in reversal of gender bias in cognitive ability, while maintaining pastoral aggression. (We can easily measure this, and all data I’ve seen supports it.) 2) The result has been adoption of the female group social strategy, 3) … and the Female primate’s reproductive strategy for constraining alphas. 4) Female Humans seek systemic free riding and parasitism upon the commons (force the tribe to pay the cost of her offspring), control reproduction and leadership by undermining, and undermine using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, straw manning, heaping of undue praise, and spreading of undue criticism. They poison(pollute) the informational commons. All female behavior evolved to either control children at the lowest cost, obtain rents from men and the commons at lowest cost, and to increase the cost of her sex, affection, and political support (positive gossiping), by both scarcity of it an constant undermining in the absence of it. ( It’s a very simple algorithm really.) 5) So, Ashkenazi behavior and its damage to all host civilizations is just Instinct, common interest, common strategy, and not conspiracy: Neither women nor Ashkenazim know that they do. They both destroy unless their behaviors are severely limited. And the lesson is that males that cannot constrain their females (or their proxies) from undermining are too weak to rule (defend). Evolution does its work if men do not. 6) In other words: The Culture of Critique is just the Female Group Evolutionary Strategy making use of each innovation in “distribution” writing, traveling and preaching, printing, mass media, the priesthood and the academy, the entertainment industry and the media rallying women and the underclasses against the aristocracy (white males). 8) The Technological History is: Gossip > Monotheism(writing) > Pseudoscience(printing) > Industrialized Lying (major media) 7) This is the answer to @TOOEdit’s mystery. “They are all female” and act accordingly out of intuition to undermine at all opportunities, and to seek parasitic rents on the commons. 8) Our only mistake was ‘free speech’ rather than free warrantied (ie: truthful) speech. And our means of correction is quite simple. Extend the involuntary warranty we impose upon goods and services to that of speech (information); restore Defamation, (Libel, Slander), and physical retaliation for insult (fighting or ‘the judicial duel’); We let loose the industrialization of lying under the premise of false speech under the assumption that our high trust people and our high trust habits were universal to man. But they are not only unique to westerners, but unique to western males who aggressively police their honor (reputations) by the aggressive physical and legal suppression of falsehood, and the universal duty to do so. White males are the human race’s aristocracy and developed aristocratic technological civilization using heroism, truth, sovereignty, reciprocity( empirical law of tort), markets in everything, including a market government between the classes, and markets for information in multiple disciplines. Only the most competitive people can use meritocracy. The weak cannot. They will lose. Hence why no other civilization evolved what the west did. Truth, Testimony, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciprocity: Tort, Markets in everything as a consequence, and competition, reason, empiricism, and science to resolve differences between those markets. So excellence and superiority are not a question. They’re measurable. We pay the high cost of truth and duty regardless of the cost to the signal hierarchy (dominance or competence hierarchy). We invented truth reason empiricism science, market civilization because only we could – because only the most competitive can succeed under meritocracy. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • He Solution to Kevin Mac Donald’s Question of How and Why the Culture of Critique

    (important) (core) 1) Ashkenazis succeeded in reversal of gender bias in cognitive ability, while maintaining pastoral aggression. (We can easily measure this, and all data I’ve seen supports it.) 2) The result has been adoption of the female group social strategy, 3) … and the Female primate’s reproductive strategy for constraining alphas. 4) Female Humans seek systemic free riding and parasitism upon the commons (force the tribe to pay the cost of her offspring), control reproduction and leadership by undermining, and undermine using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, straw manning, heaping of undue praise, and spreading of undue criticism. They poison(pollute) the informational commons. All female behavior evolved to either control children at the lowest cost, obtain rents from men and the commons at lowest cost, and to increase the cost of her sex, affection, and political support (positive gossiping), by both scarcity of it an constant undermining in the absence of it. ( It’s a very simple algorithm really.) 5) So, Ashkenazi behavior and its damage to all host civilizations is just Instinct, common interest, common strategy, and not conspiracy: Neither women nor Ashkenazim know that they do. They both destroy unless their behaviors are severely limited. And the lesson is that males that cannot constrain their females (or their proxies) from undermining are too weak to rule (defend). Evolution does its work if men do not. 6) In other words: The Culture of Critique is just the Female Group Evolutionary Strategy making use of each innovation in “distribution” writing, traveling and preaching, printing, mass media, the priesthood and the academy, the entertainment industry and the media rallying women and the underclasses against the aristocracy (white males). 8) The Technological History is: Gossip > Monotheism(writing) > Pseudoscience(printing) > Industrialized Lying (major media) 7) This is the answer to @TOOEdit’s mystery. “They are all female” and act accordingly out of intuition to undermine at all opportunities, and to seek parasitic rents on the commons. 8) Our only mistake was ‘free speech’ rather than free warrantied (ie: truthful) speech. And our means of correction is quite simple. Extend the involuntary warranty we impose upon goods and services to that of speech (information); restore Defamation, (Libel, Slander), and physical retaliation for insult (fighting or ‘the judicial duel’); We let loose the industrialization of lying under the premise of false speech under the assumption that our high trust people and our high trust habits were universal to man. But they are not only unique to westerners, but unique to western males who aggressively police their honor (reputations) by the aggressive physical and legal suppression of falsehood, and the universal duty to do so. White males are the human race’s aristocracy and developed aristocratic technological civilization using heroism, truth, sovereignty, reciprocity( empirical law of tort), markets in everything, including a market government between the classes, and markets for information in multiple disciplines. Only the most competitive people can use meritocracy. The weak cannot. They will lose. Hence why no other civilization evolved what the west did. Truth, Testimony, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciprocity: Tort, Markets in everything as a consequence, and competition, reason, empiricism, and science to resolve differences between those markets. So excellence and superiority are not a question. They’re measurable. We pay the high cost of truth and duty regardless of the cost to the signal hierarchy (dominance or competence hierarchy). We invented truth reason empiricism science, market civilization because only we could – because only the most competitive can succeed under meritocracy. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • The Obligations Of The Intergenerational Kin Group Corporation

    THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE INTERGENERATIONAL KIN GROUP CORPORATION (Nobility) Tolerance of Disapproval, Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, and Rallying by the … ah, shall we say, marginal classes – themselves unable to create competitive intergenerational kin groups – is as obligatory as is Noblesse Oblige. We must not deny the petty people their illusions. 😉 lolz
  • If you just look at the sequence: 1 – Female reproductive strategy 2 – Jewish gr

    If you just look at the sequence:

    1 – Female reproductive strategy

    2 – Jewish group evolutionary strategy

    3 – Christian group evolutionary strategy

    4 – Muslim group evolutionary strategy

    5 – Marxist-Postmodernist group evolutionary strategy

    All we are talking about is increasing levels of coercion for the purpose of theft, as scale increases.

    I mean. Humans are very simple things.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-05 12:43:00 UTC

  • If you just look at the sequence: 1 – Female reproductive strategy 2 – Jewish gr

    If you just look at the sequence: 1 – Female reproductive strategy 2 – Jewish group evolutionary strategy 3 – Christian group evolutionary strategy 4 – Muslim group evolutionary strategy 5 – Marxist-Postmodernist group evolutionary strategy All we are talking about is increasing levels of coercion for the purpose of theft, as scale increases. I mean. Humans are very simple things.
  • If you just look at the sequence: 1 – Female reproductive strategy 2 – Jewish gr

    If you just look at the sequence: 1 – Female reproductive strategy 2 – Jewish group evolutionary strategy 3 – Christian group evolutionary strategy 4 – Muslim group evolutionary strategy 5 – Marxist-Postmodernist group evolutionary strategy All we are talking about is increasing levels of coercion for the purpose of theft, as scale increases. I mean. Humans are very simple things.
  • The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Mo

    The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law)

    The Age of Scriptural Monotheism (Fictionalism) – The Revolt against reason and Meritocracy. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam)

    The Abrahamic Dark Age. (1000 years)

    The Age of Empiricism

    The French and German Age of Rationalism (Rousseau, Kant) – A revolt against empiricism

    The Age of Science (Darwin, Maxwell, Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Poincare)

    The Age of Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Keynes) – A revolt against Science.

    The Age of Outright Lying (Postmodernists – the current age)

    Now what?

    (I’m working on it…) lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-02 12:17:00 UTC

  • The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Mo

    The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Monotheism (Fictionalism) – The Revolt against reason and Meritocracy. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) The Abrahamic Dark Age. (1000 years) The Age of Empiricism The French and German Age of Rationalism (Rousseau, Kant) – A revolt against empiricism The Age of Science (Darwin, Maxwell, Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Poincare) The Age of Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Keynes) – A revolt against Science. The Age of Outright Lying (Postmodernists – the current age) Now what? (I’m working on it…) lol
  • The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Mo

    The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Monotheism (Fictionalism) – The Revolt against reason and Meritocracy. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) The Abrahamic Dark Age. (1000 years) The Age of Empiricism The French and German Age of Rationalism (Rousseau, Kant) – A revolt against empiricism The Age of Science (Darwin, Maxwell, Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Poincare) The Age of Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Keynes) – A revolt against Science. The Age of Outright Lying (Postmodernists – the current age) Now what? (I’m working on it…) lol