Form: Sketch

COGFEM VS COGMALE THINKING
(I’m just working through this line of reasoning.)

There is a vast difference between disambiguation (what we do) and deconstruction (what the enemy does). We seek truth to adapt to the universe and benefit from transforming it (Power). They seek not to adapt and to parasitically live off the production of others. (Retaliation).

The CogFem consists of ‘shopping’ (gathering) and the CogMale consists of ‘engineering’ (hunting). And I think that paradigm might provide the intuitionistic explanatory power – the model – that helps us understand the difference between the sexes.

The sex differences in the way we do math, and the limits in math and all theoretical construction, expose the substantial differences in the sexes. But as I’ve tried to point out reductio testing does not expose that difference in intuitions – needs real-world problem-solving.

Shopping, Parasitism, and Non-Adaptation (CogFem), vs Engineering, Producing and Adapting (CogMale). Civ was the result of domestication that made possible sufficient asymmetric production, that the hyperconsumption, maladaptation, and dysgenia of females could be domesticated.

One of the core insights of the European vs Jewish Systems of Decidability: Compromise, Reasonableness, Consensus are limited to preferences and reduce the cognitive burden of the individual when ability and information are lacking. But aren’t “True or adaptive.”

We’re bots. Mothers have the behaviors they need. Men have the behaviors they need. Voluntary cooperation assists us in calculating an equilibrium between needs, wants ability and resources in time.