Form: Short Note

  • Because: Save Our Western Civilization Not Just The USA

    Nov 15, 2019, 9:05 PM 1) a country, confederacy, needs 1B people to concentrate enough military and research capital to compete in the world now. 2) usa 350m, uk 66m, ca 36m, au 24m, nz 5m = <500M and all naval. 3)”Real” europe is about 500M. And all continental. So that’s 1B. If we’re lucky. 4) Anglo civ can tolerate the correction. Continental can’t. It will collapse. 5) need to save UK, CA, and AU as well. Then it’s possible to save europe. In other words, we need the trade block,to make sure we all survive, and we need the lightest possible anchor tying us together,. 6) Every other monarchy, even internal, is less predictable. 7) would save the monarchy and help us restore monarchies across europe ensuring no ((())) takeover. (which is their strategy)

  • Monarchy

    Monarchy https://t.co/NEfEe6AHYE

  • Monarchy

    Monarchy https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/monarchy/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 14:19:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267098464451690497

  • Monarchy

    OK. I’ll bite that an american monarchy from the military families, with educational support from one of the northern european monarchical families (denmark?) would accomplish the same goals, because of the natural alliance between the monarchies. Ok? Does that make you feel better? 😉 Besides if you’re anti-constitutional-monarchy as judge of last resort you are simply another useful idiot for the enemy’s program of undermining our civilization. They’re the one’s who want to end the great families and end the nationalism. And you’re just another useful idiot.

  • Monarchy

    OK. I’ll bite that an american monarchy from the military families, with educational support from one of the northern european monarchical families (denmark?) would accomplish the same goals, because of the natural alliance between the monarchies. Ok? Does that make you feel better? 😉 Besides if you’re anti-constitutional-monarchy as judge of last resort you are simply another useful idiot for the enemy’s program of undermining our civilization. They’re the one’s who want to end the great families and end the nationalism. And you’re just another useful idiot.

  • In other words the world wars cut the second scientific revolution and we are st

    In other words the world wars cut the second scientific revolution and we are still paying for it. Yes, the initial gains were more dramatic.

    IMO scientific returns are evolving upward (toward complexity) just as are violence, predation, and war. (lower gains)

    Reply addressees: @MarcusDirusso @jollyheretic

  • In other words the world wars cut the second scientific revolution and we are st

    In other words the world wars cut the second scientific revolution and we are still paying for it. Yes, the initial gains were more dramatic.

    IMO scientific returns are evolving upward (toward complexity) just as are violence, predation, and war. (lower gains)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 14:14:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267097093384085510

    Reply addressees: @MarcusDirusso @jollyheretic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267092055689269248

  • Reminder: Humans have very little agency.

    Reminder: Humans have very little agency. Those of us who are at the extreme end of the spectrum have much more agency than most. So we cannot necessarily blame people for their genetics – we can only blame each other for not creating rule of law that limits the damage done by their genetics.

  • Reminder: Humans have very little agency.

    Reminder: Humans have very little agency. Those of us who are at the extreme end of the spectrum have much more agency than most. So we cannot necessarily blame people for their genetics – we can only blame each other for not creating rule of law that limits the damage done by their genetics.

  • Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet”

    Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relative ignorance, he is no different from his consumptive (liberal) counterpart. The only ‘truthful’ empirical, and therefore ‘conservative’ answer is: “i don’t know yet” But ‘i know…’ is merely a statement of being lazy or incompetent.