Just as entropy must be articulated as physics, chemistry, biology, etc, Natural Law must be articulated as natural rights for the simple reason that it’s not possible to correctly deduce all applications of entropy without the requisite domain knowledge, or is it possible to correctly deduce all applications of reciprocity without requisite domain knowledge – although when stated that way it’s kind of helpful.
Form: Short Note
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Just as entropy must be articulated as physics, chemistry, biology, etc, Natural Law must be articulated as natural rights for the simple reason that it’s not possible to correctly deduce all applications of entropy without the requisite domain knowledge, or is it possible to correctly deduce all applications of reciprocity without requisite domain knowledge – although when stated that way it’s kind of helpful.
-
Some Female Physics Ms Says No Such Thing Exists?
Oct 30, 2019, 12:12 PM I use ‘frothy’ universe, and Kaku uses ‘bubbly’ universe but the principle same and it’s the only one that I can make sense of.
—“springy’ ‘stringy’ ‘wavey’ all similar descriptions that have been thrown around but none that don’t rely on appeals to analogy, yet.”—John Smith ‘
i use: the underlying structure of the universe always and everywhere is geometric, and therefore all waves describe the reorganization of geometric first-structure of the universe, as altered as energy moves through it, changing charges, and releasing charges, with what we call atoms, steady states of those charges moving through the underlying geometry.
-
Some Female Physics Ms Says No Such Thing Exists?
Oct 30, 2019, 12:12 PM I use ‘frothy’ universe, and Kaku uses ‘bubbly’ universe but the principle same and it’s the only one that I can make sense of.
—“springy’ ‘stringy’ ‘wavey’ all similar descriptions that have been thrown around but none that don’t rely on appeals to analogy, yet.”—John Smith ‘
i use: the underlying structure of the universe always and everywhere is geometric, and therefore all waves describe the reorganization of geometric first-structure of the universe, as altered as energy moves through it, changing charges, and releasing charges, with what we call atoms, steady states of those charges moving through the underlying geometry.
-
The Constitution is for normies, not the methodology
The Constitution is for normies, not the methodology. https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-constitution-is-for-normies-not-the-methodology/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 12:47:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267437511237947392
-
The Constitution is for normies, not the methodology.
THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE FOR NORMIES I’m pretty sure the ‘constitution’ is the deliverable you’re looking for. I think I should be able to get it to where it has the full case in it. And it’ll be a long paper, short ‘book’ or what was called a pamphlet in the past. Working on it and it’s getting ‘clear’. The List of “proofs’” of internal consistency of P-Law judgements will be for the politically interested. The book is for supergeeks. If I live long enough to work on religion that will be for everyone.
-
The Constitution is for normies, not the methodology.
THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE FOR NORMIES I’m pretty sure the ‘constitution’ is the deliverable you’re looking for. I think I should be able to get it to where it has the full case in it. And it’ll be a long paper, short ‘book’ or what was called a pamphlet in the past. Working on it and it’s getting ‘clear’. The List of “proofs’” of internal consistency of P-Law judgements will be for the politically interested. The book is for supergeeks. If I live long enough to work on religion that will be for everyone.
-
PROXIMITY CREATES HOSTILITY: SO SEPARATE, GOVERN, PROSPER, AND CONTINUE TO SPECI
PROXIMITY CREATES HOSTILITY:
SO SEPARATE, GOVERN, PROSPER,
AND CONTINUE TO SPECIATE
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 12:29:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267432978004795394
Reply addressees: @MarcusDirusso @GemmaTognini
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267431336513605633
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MarcusDirusso @GemmaTognini Solutions are simple: truth.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1267431336513605633
-
THE OBVIOUS: The state correctly labels ANTIFA as a (communist) Terrorist organi
THE OBVIOUS: The state correctly labels ANTIFA as a (communist) Terrorist organization, and the left’s narrative changes overnight.
Now the news media is trying to claim that blacks are not excessively more violent, criminal, immoral, unethical, rude and harmful to the commons. https://t.co/qq1bPlOo9R
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 12:28:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267432737738305537
-
THE OBVIOUS: The state correctly labels ANTIFA as a (communist) Terrorist organi
THE OBVIOUS: The state correctly labels ANTIFA as a (communist) Terrorist organization, and the left’s narrative changes overnight.
Now the news media is trying to claim that blacks are not excessively more violent, criminal, immoral, unethical, rude and harmful to the commons. https://t.co/qq1bPlOo9R