Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • Training the Moral Intuition

      I suppose that like many people, you assume man is moral, rather than amoral – merely choosing between the moral and immoral as incentives provide. We can in fact read others intentions and incentives. We could not cooperate on means or ends otherwise. However history says that such reading of intentions and incentives creates moral behavior, and trains moral intuition – not that moral behavior is intuitive. It’s not. Only reading of intentions and incentives. As anyone who has raised young children finds rather obvious. (worth repeating)

  • (Religion is the most difficult problem in social science. Now that I understand

    (Religion is the most difficult problem in social science. Now that I understand it, the problem is knowing what to do about it. And while I now what to do. The existing fundamentalist population is … a challenge.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:45:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267603208500850688

    Reply addressees: @pocalypsehustle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267601077437947904

  • (Religion is the most difficult problem in social science. Now that I understand

    (Religion is the most difficult problem in social science. Now that I understand it, the problem is knowing what to do about it. And while I now what to do. The existing fundamentalist population is … a challenge.)

    Reply addressees: @pocalypsehustle

  • Pilpul and Derivatives Are Framed As, but Not Contingent or Causal.

    PILPUL AND DERIVATIVES ARE FRAMED AS, BUT NOT CONTINGENT OR CAUSAL.

    —“A thought on grammars of ambiguation – pilpul and derivative ideologies base on primacy of linguistics would be grammars that are neither contingent nor causal, but are framed to be so?”—Bill Joslin

    Smart. Correct. — REGARDING —

    —“So it’s correct to call apriorism an ideal grammar, but not a formal grammar. Thankfully I finally know how to talk about the grammars of each incremental dimension… sigh. Mathematical grammars are not contingent because of constant relations. That’s their beauty. The problem is they’re non causal.Linguistic (Philosophical) grammars are contingent. That’s their weakness.Operational grammars are not contingent. And they’re causal. That’s their beauty.”—Curt Doolittle

  • Pilpul and Derivatives Are Framed As, but Not Contingent or Causal.

    PILPUL AND DERIVATIVES ARE FRAMED AS, BUT NOT CONTINGENT OR CAUSAL.

    —“A thought on grammars of ambiguation – pilpul and derivative ideologies base on primacy of linguistics would be grammars that are neither contingent nor causal, but are framed to be so?”—Bill Joslin

    Smart. Correct. — REGARDING —

    —“So it’s correct to call apriorism an ideal grammar, but not a formal grammar. Thankfully I finally know how to talk about the grammars of each incremental dimension… sigh. Mathematical grammars are not contingent because of constant relations. That’s their beauty. The problem is they’re non causal.Linguistic (Philosophical) grammars are contingent. That’s their weakness.Operational grammars are not contingent. And they’re causal. That’s their beauty.”—Curt Doolittle

  • The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states

    The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states: https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-10-least-and-10-most-tax-friendly-states/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:31:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267599701119053829

  • The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states

    The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states: https://t.co/nVrg83Z2Md

  • The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states:

    The 10 least tax-friendly states: 1. Illinois (Force chicago into a city state) 2. Connecticut (it’s dead. the state is dead) 3. New York (end the fed, end NYC forever) 4. Wisconsin (because swedes are socialists) 5. New Jersey (because it’s an dump?) 6. Nebraska (because real estate taxes can’t do it ) 7. Pennsylvania (because of philadelphia and rust belt) 8. Ohio (How did they screw up that state? How?) 9. Iowa (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) 10. Kansas (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) The 10 most tax-friendly states: 1. Wyoming – No income tax 2. Nevada – No income tax 3. Tennessee – only income tax on interest and dividends. 4. Florida – wealth magnet. Poor magnet. 5. Alaska – no demand. 6. Washington – legacy. reasons 7. South Dakota – no population to service 8. North Dakota – no population to service 9. Arizona – american switzerland (gambling) 10. New Hampshire – only decent people live here and no redistribution so no low parasites. southern european and catholic immigration storm didn’t hit here.

  • The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states:

    The 10 least tax-friendly states: 1. Illinois (Force chicago into a city state) 2. Connecticut (it’s dead. the state is dead) 3. New York (end the fed, end NYC forever) 4. Wisconsin (because swedes are socialists) 5. New Jersey (because it’s an dump?) 6. Nebraska (because real estate taxes can’t do it ) 7. Pennsylvania (because of philadelphia and rust belt) 8. Ohio (How did they screw up that state? How?) 9. Iowa (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) 10. Kansas (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) The 10 most tax-friendly states: 1. Wyoming – No income tax 2. Nevada – No income tax 3. Tennessee – only income tax on interest and dividends. 4. Florida – wealth magnet. Poor magnet. 5. Alaska – no demand. 6. Washington – legacy. reasons 7. South Dakota – no population to service 8. North Dakota – no population to service 9. Arizona – american switzerland (gambling) 10. New Hampshire – only decent people live here and no redistribution so no low parasites. southern european and catholic immigration storm didn’t hit here.

  • Wisdom Literature Good and Bad

    Wisdom Literature Good and Bad https://t.co/BvtNGYnUz4