Form: Short Note

UPDATE

1) The ‘game’: While you get sick and tired of it, so does the enemy. And … it worked. It always works. “Exhuast the Criticism”. Make them sick of the narrative. I did. Taleb does it even better than I do. He just has an educated audeience, and I have to do it with a working class audience.

DISCOVERY

2) I had to discover what was causing the right to fail because adversity means getting truth from them. I did. If it means I reinforce the negative aspects of my reputation that’s a cost I have to bear. Over time, this personality (which is not authentic) will remain a brand.

3) I had to discover if john was right, he was: Social media won’t work b/c bad people vastly outnumber good. So all has to be done not by marketing FAST but by relationship building in person: SLOWLY. Too slowly to affect this election.

4) I had to discover whether WN can be put on strategy rather than emotion. The young on SM can’t, and they’re the overwhelming majority. too emotional. not like the left, loyal no matter what, strategic, no matter what, goal oriented, no matter what.

5) I had to discover if it’s generation gap. It isn’t it’s a maturity gap. SM is flooeded with lost children grasping at straws of self respect, honor, and pride while rome burns. It is. This means the dissident right is a purity spiral mob that cannot be put to use like the left mob can be. So I discovered that the right is an even worse mob than the left – one that does nothing.

6) So together I had to discover if the 100k number was passible. if enough men across the conservatie spectrum can be animated to show up for policy that produces their wants, rather than satisfies their emotions. I can’t do it on social media.

7) My strategy for rapid victory will only work, and work fast, if I can get 100k guys to show up for policy that holds the moral high ground and makes the state the enemy BUT the boys want to show up for identity that doesn’t – and identity asks OTHERS to come up with policy; those others are the enemy; so their strategy is inactionable AND makes the world the enemy. They want to rage as a tribe, not win as a polity.

8) The universalism of the P-model will only work if we sell rule of law, the enemy is ((()) financial, media,and state that pit us against each other, and that we want to win for everyone.

RESULTS?

1) This means the team has to work with Social Media, (which is what you all want anyway) We have to divorce “marketing”(indirect) from “sales”(direct).

2) And I have to choose between:

(a) FAST: (“VIctory By Spring”) Taking the WN lead, explcitly WN, and Try to get the strategy to work as a set of demands rather than as ‘peaceful settlement’, (and ruining my life in the process.) And just suffering the manbois.

-OR-

(b) SLOW: focus on international nationalism-for-everyone and work across all countries rather than political activism in this country. Building an offline team of serious men. And Not suffering the manbois.

-OR-

c) SPLIT STRATEGY:

… i) keep the team on social media, and;

… ii) find some WN wants to take the FAST straegy (constitution as demands), and go out and lead with WN first, FAST, and the boys will certainly follow. I don’t know who that person would be. I would prefer it was someone in the middle or working classes that is more suited to macho messaging that the boys want.

… iii) Stay international and intellectual myself, I know who the enemy is, and I want to defeat the enemy on a global scale. With USA necessary as the first battleground.Updated Jul 12, 2020, 9:03 AM