The rest are Pragmatic(Brazil, Egypt, Italy, Spain, Israel), anti-empirical to the point of ideological: Germany, Denmark, Sweden, USA, UK, CN, AUS), Ideologically Supremacist (France), Theologically Supremacist (Turkey, Iran). Racially supremacist (China).
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Form: Short Note
-
The rest are Pragmatic(Brazil, Egypt, Italy, Spain, Israel), anti-empirical to t
-
The rest are Pragmatic(Brazil, Egypt, Italy, Spain, Israel), anti-empirical to t
The rest are Pragmatic(Brazil, Egypt, Italy, Spain, Israel), anti-empirical to the point of ideological: Germany, Denmark, Sweden, USA, UK, CN, AUS), Ideologically Supremacist (France), Theologically Supremacist (Turkey, Iran). Racially supremacist (China).
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-04 22:18:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290774038785265666
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290772331057610754
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@RealityRelate There is only one country in the power index that is empirical and non-expansionary, and that’s Japan. There is only one other country that’s empirical but expansionary: Russia. The next most rational country is India but India has profound problems that appear insurmountable.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1290772331057610754
-
There is only one country in the power index that is empirical and non-expansion
There is only one country in the power index that is empirical and non-expansionary, and that’s Japan. There is only one other country that’s empirical but expansionary: Russia. The next most rational country is India but India has profound problems that appear insurmountable.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-04 22:11:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290772331057610754
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290759897693466631
-
There is only one country in the power index that is empirical and non-expansion
There is only one country in the power index that is empirical and non-expansionary, and that’s Japan. There is only one other country that’s empirical but expansionary: Russia. The next most rational country is India but India has profound problems that appear insurmountable.
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate -
Hanson is always worth a listen
Hanson is always worth a listen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT7CrEoqoSU
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-03 22:52:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290420193383063552
-
Hanson is always worth a listen
Hanson is always worth a listen.
https://t.co/dDzAK7ddXQ -
The fourth dimension is simply not caring about what people think. Most likely s
The fourth dimension is simply not caring about what people think. Most likely spectra are:
Disagreeable <-> Antagonistic <-> Psychopathy
vs
Submissive Neurotic <-> Dominant Grandiosity
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-03 19:58:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290376608059203589
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290375469012062208
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthQuest11 Three common behaviors: Agentic Narcissism mainly refers to a self-view of being grandiose, Antagonistic Narcissism mainly refers to one’s willingness to exploit others for personal gains, and Neurotic Narcissism mainly refers to one’s need to get positive feedback from others.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1290375469012062208
-
The fourth dimension is simply not caring about what people think. Most likely s
The fourth dimension is simply not caring about what people think. Most likely spectra are:
Disagreeable <-> Antagonistic <-> Psychopathy
vs
Submissive Neurotic <-> Dominant Grandiosity
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 -
Why Hayek? I consider my work an extension of, or formalization, of Hayek’s work
Why Hayek? I consider my work an extension of, or formalization, of Hayek’s work. I just benefitted from being born in the generation of the computer revolution, and from Gary Becker’s work on the economics of human behavior. His RTSerfdom implies the informational commons.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-02 17:05:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289970660891074560
Reply addressees: @MaMo_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289966807822921728
-
Why Hayek? I consider my work an extension of, or formalization, of Hayek’s work
Why Hayek? I consider my work an extension of, or formalization, of Hayek’s work. I just benefitted from being born in the generation of the computer revolution, and from Gary Becker’s work on the economics of human behavior. His RTSerfdom implies the informational commons.
Reply addressees: @MaMo_