Sympathy (condition), Empathy (emotion), prediction (projection), various social cognitive biases, over-suggest compatibility to maximize cooperative opportunity. High empathy and agreeableness produce illusion. ie: progressives are science deniers on man, conservative on nature. https://t.co/z1GvTNruti
Form: Short Note
-
The Mesolithic Dark Age was worse than I’d thought. Far worse. I had no idea. Bu
The Mesolithic Dark Age was worse than I’d thought. Far worse. I had no idea. But the minute you start looking for trouble, you find it, and OMG it was a horrible time to be human.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-07 00:31:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1313637952250052608
-
The Mesolithic Dark Age was worse than I’d thought. Far worse. I had no idea. Bu
The Mesolithic Dark Age was worse than I’d thought. Far worse. I had no idea. But the minute you start looking for trouble, you find it, and OMG it was a horrible time to be human.
-
Dan Rather, an activist in the undermining of American and western civilization
Dan Rather, an activist in the undermining of American and western civilization using the time tested method of Jewish Critique, Pilpul, False Promise, Free Riding, and Organized Crime against the Commons. History is already being written to reflect their postwar war on the west.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-05 13:24:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1313107772045750272
Reply addressees: @DecimatedLiver @dbongino
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1313095768740331520
-
Dan Rather, an activist in the undermining of American and western civilization
Dan Rather, an activist in the undermining of American and western civilization using the time tested method of Jewish Critique, Pilpul, False Promise, Free Riding, and Organized Crime against the Commons. History is already being written to reflect their postwar war on the west.
Reply addressees: @DecimatedLiver @dbongino -
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rat
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rational philosophy, legal and economic science – is a useful contribution to european natural law of reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837503917920256
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837502319853575
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the empathic imitation of Jesus treatment of others, or (b) the rational adoption of the scientific statement of those ethics, (c) relies upon and teaches the Abrahamic method of deceit (and ignorance).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837502319853575
-
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rat
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rational philosophy, legal and economic science – is a useful contribution to european natural law of reciprocity.
-
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with natural law and the only known via-positiva enhancement of it. (And the optimum advice (philosophy) for the weak, the dim, and the meek is to follow that strategy because they will do least harm.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837500763865088
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837499140661249
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4. This optimum strategy is not evident in the test of reciprocity which is a via-negativa science of what not to do. It is counter-intuitive, and non-obvious (and therefore unique) to EMPIRICALLY exhaust forgiveness of another INDIVIDUAL before determining that effort futile.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837499140661249
-
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with natural law and the only known via-positiva enhancement of it. (And the optimum advice (philosophy) for the weak, the dim, and the meek is to follow that strategy because they will do least harm.)
-
4. This optimum strategy is not evident in the test of reciprocity which is a vi
4. This optimum strategy is not evident in the test of reciprocity which is a via-negativa science of what not to do. It is counter-intuitive, and non-obvious (and therefore unique) to EMPIRICALLY exhaust forgiveness of another INDIVIDUAL before determining that effort futile.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837499140661249
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837497261621249
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the optimum strategy for maximizing cooperation – and it is completely contrary to natural human instinct to favor family, clan, kin.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837497261621249