We are still seeing the ‘less developed’ world problem in all aspects of international finance, transport and trade. In that in the ‘germanicized’ west, lower ranks are responsible for not letting the upper ranks fail – and visa versa. This concept is simply alien to all others.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-12 18:50:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370447046277275648
It’s interesting that the best most active people we have (Martin, Brandon, and Luke) were following Bill’s teaching of P. I think you must move through a transitional phase when it’s terribly alien. As P develops legitimacy, people will invest without the transitional phase.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-12 13:10:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370361620753436675
Watching Brandon become a philosopher in his own right illustrates the difference between seeking understanding (and plateauing) and seeking an existential solution and without. We’re never DONE.
Again: Problems not puzzles. From Problems to books, not books to problems.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-12 13:07:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370360877963223043
It’s a sh-t industry. The similarity between Grad student, Acting, Music, Advertising, and Drug Dealing industries: the false promise of potential creates endless cheap labor at the bottom and corruption at the top, with only a handful of outliers escaping it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 21:41:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370127755225001985
Reply addressees: @DigitalHeretyk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370121931303788548
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason. Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
-Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII
“Sense-making” like “True For Me” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and “Rationality”, like “True“(testifiable), is absolute (a complete set) like Physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set). We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy? This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason. Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
-Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII
“Sense-making” like “True For Me” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and “Rationality”, like “True“(testifiable), is absolute (a complete set) like Physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set). We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy? This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason.
Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
-Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII
“Sense-making” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and rationality is absolute (a complete set) like physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set).
We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy?
This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 15:34:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105871893527054988
The germans had no other competitive opportunity other than excellence. Start with european rule of law, and give no other opportunity than excellence and you see why evolution eventually produced the prussians. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1369688744752783368
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 22:44:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369781263981219841
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1369688744752783368
Neurons, meaning, Assemblies (micro networks) of neurons, are purely Darwinian: Randomness(disorder) > Selection(Success in ordering) > Plasticity (adaptation (efficiency)). Neural networks evolve into sparse fast efficient cheap and increasingly general and accurate.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 22:42:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369780803501195267
LIKE I SAID, RUSSIA MUST HAVE LAND ACCESS TO CRIMEA. So they are going to do what Russians always do. Wait for an opportune moment or circumstance but never surrender. Same as the chinese.
https://www.unian.info/war/abkhazia-scenario-russia-could-deploy-peacekeepers-in-donbas-11347237.html
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 21:43:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369765790577201153