
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:32:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453731400247435265


Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:32:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453731400247435265
And I’ll use that Female:Cancer vs Male:Aging as the biological equivalent of the unregulated expression of female hyperconsumption and infatilization vs male hypercapitalization, and …again… reciprocal exchange discovering the continuously moving equilibrium between them
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:54:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453721920055111682
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453721500448530432
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453721500448530432
So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:53:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453721500448530432
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720984070942729
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453720984070942729
So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:51:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720984070942729
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720610178158603
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
So this is why we see Christians (continuous training in adult responsibility for self, family, commons) producing families across the classes, and conservatives doing it out of instinct and tradition.We see infantilization across the progressive spectrum: responsibility evasion.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453720610178158603
So this is why we see Christians (continuous training in adult responsibility for self, family, commons) producing families across the classes, and conservatives doing it out of instinct and tradition.We see infantilization across the progressive spectrum: responsibility evasion.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:49:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720610178158603
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720141456297991
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453720141456297991
And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:47:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720141456297991
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719761297166346
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453719761297166346
But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:46:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719761297166346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719411890679816
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I mean for example, the female instinct is to maximize consumption so she and hers won’t be left behind, just as much as the male instinct is to maximize capital. So in any condition where the female can hyper-consumer without social regulation of it, she will do so on instinct.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453719411890679816
Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s depressing.Seriously. But, as in anything, disambiguation(decomposition) of the problem provides insights into females more so than males, as to just how much we’re bots and how simple the algorithm.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:43:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719081341890560
better framing of xianity is as a natural cultural extension of neotenic evolution, which maximizes the opportunity for sortition and mutual adaptation and continuous mindfulness.
still working through the dating question and identifying the reason Christians don’t MALADAPT.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 21:21:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453471941826908163
I have internalized the adaptive costs of neural economy so deeply that it’s an intuition to model all human behavior as neural (adaptive) economics.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 22:44:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453130325396279301