Every time we get an increase in followers we have to go through a purge, blocking young male idiots. Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:25:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456779648503779331
Every time we get an increase in followers we have to go through a purge, blocking young male idiots. Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:25:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456779648503779331
Another example. Nitwit reads internet articles and one or two books and gains enough insight that he tries to demonstrate competency when the mastery of any subject, and multiple subjects necessary for non-specialization requires exhausting the literature b/c most is false. https://twitter.com/LordDugin/status/1456773834749595649
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:20:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456778604604534796
As I say rather often: The fact that I’m available to common folk, so that I can use common folk for researching the understanding of common folk, doesn’t mean we are peers. You are welcome to find someone competent to debate me if you can. But the requisite knowledge is rare.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:14:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456777032692609024
Reply addressees: @DerekDugin @joeldavisx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775897059528713
So when I say I understand the problem of modern economics as well or better than anyone, I’m pretty sure I do. But this is because I understand more broadly the failure of the operationalist program, and the emergence of pseudomathematics and pseudoscience because of it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:10:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775906350047232
Reply addressees: @DerekDugin @joeldavisx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775511175204868
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DerekDugin @joeldavisx The problem with the mainstream is lack of information, a failure of accounting of all changes in capital, and failure to measure variation in regular symmetries, using the wrong calculus and a dozen other things more subtle.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456775511175204868
The problem with the mainstream is lack of information, a failure of accounting of all changes in capital, and failure to measure variation in regular symmetries, using the wrong calculus and a dozen other things more subtle.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:08:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775511175204868
Reply addressees: @DerekDugin @joeldavisx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775168093741058
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DerekDugin @joeldavisx I’m sorry, but criticism of his work is well documented. You can look it up as easily as anyone else can. It’s largely ideological even if half right. So don’t seek confirmation seek falsification.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456775168093741058
And I am pretty sure I know and a few others know, how to fix economics. the problem is that it means, by implication, institutional reform that can’t be achieved without political power.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 23:54:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456771897631383552
Reply addressees: @DerekDugin @joeldavisx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456771725610397699
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DerekDugin @joeldavisx My particular interest is in computation, operationalism, and what to measure. In this sense the mengerians were correct in applying calculus to economics to produce marginalism, and there are a dozen other ‘correct’ insights. But econ is beyond the limits of math at present.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456771725610397699
My particular interest is in computation, operationalism, and what to measure. In this sense the mengerians were correct in applying calculus to economics to produce marginalism, and there are a dozen other ‘correct’ insights. But econ is beyond the limits of math at present.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 23:53:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456771725610397699
Reply addressees: @DerekDugin @joeldavisx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456771534597537798
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DerekDugin @joeldavisx Keen states the obvious for the unsophisticated reader. Like marx he bases his premises on falsehoods such as ‘society’. We know what’s wrong with economics. I probably know as well or better than anyone living.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456771534597537798
Difference between British creation of empirical rule of law and the modern state, and French utopianism of the French revolution, rights of man, as aspirational. If I get a chance I’ll try to find something I’ve written that’s more detailed. It’s simple tho.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:43:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456648354130272259
Reply addressees: @erikbrus25
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456646494371655684
Blocked by Taleb. Ignored by Khan. Don’t know miller. Big fan of Lindsay. But they I don’t ask him to cross lines he doesn’t want to, and probably shouldn’t. That’s our job. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:09:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456639866238799872
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @toodarkmark
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456638298701631490
I just don’t like the inability of men in the manosphere to distinguish between broken, dysfunctional, promiscuous trash, and women who are just as frustrated as men are. It’s too negative. Everyone’s broken. Because the left broke society, culture, and institutions.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:45:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456633699341062151