Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • You know, you can try to protect your ex from stupidity but no matter what you d

    You know, you can try to protect your ex from stupidity but no matter what you do, it never seems to work out. That’s why everyone loses.

    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-02 13:29:00 UTC

  • Are The American Future

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/04/02/castes-not-egalitarianism-are-the-natural-outcome-of-the-failure-to-break-tribal-bonds/Castes Are The American Future

    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-02 10:19:00 UTC

  • USA IS BECOMING A RACIAL CASTE SYSTEM Multicultural Egalitarianism isn’t somethi

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/04/02/castes-not-egalitarianism-are-the-natural-outcome-of-the-failure-to-break-tribal-bonds/THE USA IS BECOMING A RACIAL CASTE SYSTEM

    Multicultural Egalitarianism isn’t something new. It’s the default proposition of the lower classes. The most important accidental innovation in western political history was the church’s banning of intermarriages and the creation of women’s property rights. But that’s a circumstance that’s unique to the west. We’re using geographic sorting (The Big Sort) and assortative mating, to destroy the western cultural innovation that is the source of it’s miraculous aversion to corruption; the christian nuclear family, the manorial demand for self-sufficiency, the requirement for conformity to middle class values, and the suppression of the rates of breeding by the lower classes.

    You do not get what you ask for. You get the unintended consequences of what you ask for. Because humans are victims of a natural and inescapable hubris.

    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-02 09:35:00 UTC

  • Why Do We Conduct Ideological Warfare? Democracy. That’s why.

    Because, under Democratic Republicanism, and under Social Democracy, we conceive of government as majority right to establish laws under which we all must conform to a singular perception of the means and ends by which we create the common good, rather than a process by which we can negotiate contracts consisting of exchanges with one another despite our different preferences for means and definitions of the common good.

    Laws evolve, and are discovered not made. Contracts are made with the intention of mutual benefit. The problem with ‘laws’ is that the next legislator can break the contract between groups willfully, and bad laws do not expire with the tenure of the people who wrote them.

    Government as we have constructed it is destroying our society.

    Yes we need a new civic religion. But democratic government that makes laws, rather than contracts within the one law of voluntary exchange, should be left behind on the dustbin of history with the magical gods and treated as a superstition equal to them.

    via Curt Doolittle.

  • Why Do We Conduct Ideological Warfare? Democracy. That’s why.

    Because, under Democratic Republicanism, and under Social Democracy, we conceive of government as majority right to establish laws under which we all must conform to a singular perception of the means and ends by which we create the common good, rather than a process by which we can negotiate contracts consisting of exchanges with one another despite our different preferences for means and definitions of the common good.

    Laws evolve, and are discovered not made. Contracts are made with the intention of mutual benefit. The problem with ‘laws’ is that the next legislator can break the contract between groups willfully, and bad laws do not expire with the tenure of the people who wrote them.

    Government as we have constructed it is destroying our society.

    Yes we need a new civic religion. But democratic government that makes laws, rather than contracts within the one law of voluntary exchange, should be left behind on the dustbin of history with the magical gods and treated as a superstition equal to them.

    via Curt Doolittle.

  • THE ONLY REASON FOR IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE? Because we conceive of government as ma

    THE ONLY REASON FOR IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE?

    Because we conceive of government as majority right to establish laws to which we all must conform to a singular perception of the means and ends by which we create the common good, rather than a process by which we can negotiate contracts consisting of exchanges with one another despite our different preferences for means and definitions of the common good.

    Laws evolve, and are discovered not made. Contracts are made with the intention of mutual benefit. The problem with ‘laws’ is that the next legislator can break the contract between groups willfully, and bad laws do not expire with the tenure of the people who wrote them.

    Government as we have constructed it is destroying our society.

    Yes we need a new civic religion. But democratic government that makes laws, rather than contracts within the one law of voluntary exchange, should be left behind on the dustbin of history with the magical gods and treated as a superstition equal to them.

    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-31 10:56:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATIVES RIDICULE THE PROGRESSIVES FROM THE SIXTIES Chanting that progressi

    CONSERVATIVES RIDICULE THE PROGRESSIVES FROM THE SIXTIES

    Chanting that progressives are trapped in an non-existent world.

    But conservatives are trapped in the same context.

    Libertarians have answers.

    Libertarians have the only answers.

    It just may not be the anarcho-capitalist libertarians that have the answers.

    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-31 10:02:00 UTC

  • ARE ALWAYS BEHIND THE CURVE — BUT THEY EVENTUALLY CATCH ON Social integration t

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Oe6HUgrRlQPROGRESSIVES ARE ALWAYS BEHIND THE CURVE — BUT THEY EVENTUALLY CATCH ON

    Social integration through mythology and sermon. We just don’t need mysticism to make it happen. (And contrary to Neil Postman, we need both masculine and feminine story arcs.)

    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-30 12:18:00 UTC

  • UP 10 to 60% DEPENDING UPON MARKET It’s been tried before, in the 90’s. All publ

    http://dailyrushbo.com/rush-limbaugh-show-ratings-up-60-since-sandra-fluke-controversy/LIMBAUGH UP 10 to 60% DEPENDING UPON MARKET

    It’s been tried before, in the 90’s. All publicity is good publicity. The most powerful feedback is to ignore it, not attack it. It only feeds the beast.

    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-29 21:25:00 UTC

  • My Very Own Private Wiki Entry

    Finally, I had the courage to ask for a Wikipedia page. I actually dont like the attention, but it’s necessary marketing.