Form: Short Note

  • We Can Now Objectively And Scientifically Judge Good Philosophers And Bad Philosophers

    (suggestions wanted) [I]f we acknowledge that democracy is a failure, and all philosophers who attempted to justify democracy failures, and all philosophers who attempted to expand democracy into socialism and postmodernism failures, we are left with instrumentalists (empiricists) and reactionaries of various fields. Philosophy as a discipline, must face the uncomfortable fact, that (a) the metaphysical program failed and was solved by cognitive science, and (b) the democratic program failed and was solved by economists (c) therefore the political program failed, and was solved by heterodox philosophers (d) the ethical problem failed and was solved by economists and heterodox philosophers. The reason for this is obvious: the incentives in Academia to attempt to replace the church’s mysticism with some sort of collectivist democratic rationalism, had it’s predictable influence. Philosophers can produce good neutral and bad influences. Unfortunately, the greater body of philosophers that have been influential since the american revolution, have been more destructive than beneficial. We can never forgive Marx and Freud, any more than we can forgive Kant and Rousseau. “Thou Shalt Not Harm” not only applies to doctors, but to philosophers, and to all of us. I give great weight to computer science because unlike the logic of language and unlike abstract and mathematical logic, computer science does not drop the property of operationalism in real time from its reasoning. As such it has higher correspondence with actionable reality than mathematics, and farm more so than formal logic. And if we seek to make informal logic of any value we must learn from computer science and return the property of operationalism to philosophical discourse. Because without it, it certainly appears to consist almost entirely of nonsense built upon linguistic deception. == 99. Aristotle 99. Niccolo Machiavelli 99. Adam Smith 99. Max Weber 99. Emile Durkheim 99. David Hume 99. John Locke 99. G.W.F. Hegel 99. Friedrich Nietzsche (lesser candidates) 99. Robert Michels 99. Steven Pinker 99. Jonathan Haidt == 99. Rene Descartes 99. Alan Turing 99. Karl Popper 99. Gottlob Frege 99. W.V.O. Quine 99. Saul Kripke THE BAD PHILOSOPHERS 99. Immanuel Kant 99. Ludwig Wittgenstein 99. Karl Marx 99. Soren Kierkegaard 99. Jean-Jacques Rousseau 20. John Rawls 99. Martin Heidegger 99. Jacques Derrida 99. Michelle Foucault 99. Jean-François Lyotard 99. Jean Baudrillard 99. Murray Rothbard THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL’S BAD PHILOSOPHERS Max Horkheimer Theodor W. Adorno Herbert Marcuse Friedrich Pollock Erich Fromm Otto Kirchheimer Leo Löwenthal Franz Leopold Neumann Siegfried Kracauer Alfred Sohn-Rethel Walter Benjamin Jürgen Habermas Claus Offe Axel Honneth Oskar Negt Alfred Schmidt Albrecht Wellmer

  • Good diagnosis does not indicate good cure. Charles Hugh Smith, who I follow clo

    Good diagnosis does not indicate good cure.

    Charles Hugh Smith, who I follow closely gives great analysis of the demographics of politics.

    But he needs to read about russian kitchens, how fences make good neighbors, and the english development of the civil society – through private not shared resources.

    Our problem us the failure to constrain the breeding if the underclasses. That us the only problem facing man, because it is the cause if all problems facing man.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 06:37:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-cost-of-crimes-in-us.html?m=1


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 06:09:00 UTC

  • winters arent enough

    http://feedly.com/k/Tl0XUECold winters arent enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 04:31:00 UTC

  • might have to go through and clarify this a bit. Because its too open to fuzzy t

    http://feedly.com/k/1kP348MI might have to go through and clarify this a bit. Because its too open to fuzzy thinking and erroneous interpretation. But its a good start.

    I still also need to restate Boettke’s defense of Austrian Economics as a moral constraint. When I first started it was the best articulation – but its in desperate need of an update, and better positioning against the other Five Families of economic factions.

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 03:52:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-27/where-americas-immigrants-come


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 01:47:00 UTC

  • people. Acting silly. Pretty incompatible in theory, but we work at it. @taranti

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/awyjw1qksoxuazb/2013-07-10%2020.41.40.jpgSilly people. Acting silly.

    Pretty incompatible in theory, but we work at it.

    @tarantinos. Kiev.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-05 11:19:00 UTC

  • RIGGING AGAINST WHITE MALES

    http://feedly.com/k/1rNObgNBALLOT RIGGING AGAINST WHITE MALES


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-05 06:43:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a photo

    Curt Doolittle shared a photo.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-04 23:26:00 UTC

  • TIANANMEN VIGIL IN HONG KONG (inspiring)

    http://www.businessinsider.com/the-tiananmen-vigil-in-hong-kong-is-staggering-2014-6THE TIANANMEN VIGIL IN HONG KONG

    (inspiring)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-04 15:14:00 UTC