(seriously) (worth reading) [I]t’s been done. Secret? Threaten a big company’s revenue stream or customer base, by providing a service better than they do. Why is that possible? Internal incompetence of bureaucracies. Why? Because brands always seek to facilitate the brand with tangential value rather than deliver a product or service in the most excellent way possible for consumers regardless of brand. Almost all companies make this mistake, Apple and Microsoft included. Dropbox should never have had a chance. But every other large organization failed by trying to “leverage”. That is a fallacy. Beats threatened Apple. Multiple companies threatened Facebook. Unfortunately management falsely understands the leverage as risk mitigation rather than risk amplification. Make it excellent. Threaten them over their mistakes. That is how you become a billionaire in short fashion. Thankfully I don’t care to be more than a millionaire. I do my threatening of paradigmatic fallacies with political philosophy and for me that is a greater reward.
Form: Short Note
-
(neighborhood hangout)
https://foursquare.com/v/%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F–mafia/4bd73bb732a29521ee18d6b8/photos(personal) (neighborhood hangout)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-07 09:37:00 UTC
-
(Is it OK if I actually think like this? At least, metaphorically that is. lol )
(Is it OK if I actually think like this? At least, metaphorically that is. lol )
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-07 09:21:00 UTC
-
I love Apple products. Hard drive crash yesterday. Boot. See menu. Press “Restor
I love Apple products. Hard drive crash yesterday. Boot. See menu. Press “Restore from time machine backup”, wait three hours. Bang, you’re back in business.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-07 01:49:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-07 00:34:00 UTC
-
FIRST CAR. VERY TEMPTING PRICE
http://dcmotorcars.com/index.php/vehicle?vid=5-2l1400188436MY FIRST CAR. VERY TEMPTING PRICE
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-06 03:49:00 UTC
-
guy is 21, and the perfect entrepreneur. The reason I think his story is valuabl
http://digg.com/video/meet-new-yorks-youngest-truffle-dealerThis guy is 21, and the perfect entrepreneur. The reason I think his story is valuable to share, is that, he’s a master of his niche. And largely, entrepreneurship requires mastery of something that few other people master.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 21:09:00 UTC
-
OPPORTUNITY APPROACHES : ANOTHER CRASH Political Opportunity. Radical Political
OPPORTUNITY APPROACHES : ANOTHER CRASH
Political Opportunity.
Radical Political Opportunity
—…[The] cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (CAPE) … the so-called Shiller PE, is currently well above its long-term average of 17 and approaching levels that previously presaged doom for equities. Shiller has plotted CAPE going back to 1881 and notes (with some alarm) it has only been higher than current levels three times: In 1929, 2000 and 2007.”—-
I thought it would take until 2020 for another cycle to play out but I didn’t anticipate all this nonsensical flooding of the markets with cheap money. Eventually someone has to figure out that Krugman and Delong are wrong , and that Austrians are right, and that we’re running out of options.
The only choice is liquidation – of the corporations (states) that are bankrupt.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:45:00 UTC
-
PROPERTARIANISM IS A OF LOGIC OF COOPERATION, NOT A PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCE. Pr
PROPERTARIANISM IS A OF LOGIC OF COOPERATION, NOT A PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCE.
Propertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form.
While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception.
Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics.
Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day.
And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed.
But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs.
But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:19:00 UTC
-
AMAZING INSIGHT TONIGHT Drifting off to sleep. Woke with a start. Figured out op
AMAZING INSIGHT TONIGHT
Drifting off to sleep. Woke with a start. Figured out operational definition of Karl Popper’s work vs anglo empirical tradition.
Its a difference in ethics. Alex Naraniecki was right. Popper is a Cosmopolitan. Implicit cosmopolitan ethics. Inescapable.
Reverse Russian and operationalists were correct. Popper is correct in the sense that he means ‘try any way to get there you can think of, then harden it’. Whereas the operationalists an intuitionist say ‘try any way to get there that you can think of then construct a proof of it.” The Popperian form of truth is individualistic and utilitarian, and the anglo empirical form of truth is political.
When I tested the argument that production, technical, and scientific methods were the same. That we just valued different outputs from the scientific method, I was right.
I didnt expect the cause of so much difference in philosophy to be one of ethics. But once we discover that the underlying question is the nature of truth, then the differences in philosophical frameworks become obvious expressions of cultural differences in ethics.
We spent a century looking for a logical answer that was in the end an ethical one.
Our metaphysical judgements frame everything we do.
Fuck. I did it.
The world is a different place starting tomorrow.
Damn.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:11:00 UTC