We are really just toys for women you know. 🙂 In the aggregate they need us. In the aggregate we only want them, we don’t need them. As individuals we desire them. But for them, as individuals we just serve as entertainment. 🙂 Although, they collect harem’s too whenever possible: a group of men who will do things for them for attention and appreciation, and nothing more.
Compatibilism: Compatible, not equal.
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-01 04:35:00 UTC
So you see, with “truth” and with them as liars, we get to flip our altruistic punishment completely around.
So this is the moral high ground that we need. And unlike the 1890-1930 period, where they could only offer fear, we can demonstrate evidence.
Karma is a bitch.
You cant fool enough of the people long enough.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 06:55:00 UTC
SHOWER MIRACLES 🙂
Just realized how to frame propertarianism, and particularly instrumentalism, in historical context. Didn’t really realize what I was doing. It just sort of ‘made sense’. But it’s pretty revolutionary. Pretty happy with myself today.
Been a long journey.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 06:03:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 05:55:00 UTC
http://www.unz.com/runz/does-race-exist-do-hills-exist/
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 04:25:00 UTC
HICKS, MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, HAIDT, DOOLITTLE
You see. We have an intellectual core. 😉
Independently we come to similar conclusions by different means:
– Stephen Hicks by intellectual history.
– Kevin Macdonald by psychology, evolutionary biology, and history.
– Ricardo Duchesne by marxism and then history and intellectual history.
– Haidt by political psychology
– Doolittle by calculability (not computability): property, the logic of cooperation, institutions of cooperation, and evolutionary morality. (which is a certain form of psychology in itself)
WE HAVE DATA NOW – EVIDENCE
Previous generations could only theorize about the outcomes of socialism/postmodernism/progressivism, Rothbardian Libertinism, and neo-conservatism. But we have data.
And data is evidence.
And the evidence is in.
Unaligned or not. Organized or not. We have a movement.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 03:25:00 UTC
NO. I DON”T NEED TO SOLVE IT. MACDONALD DID: ALTRUISM, GUILT, AND ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT
The reason I didn’t buy it the first time around is because he places a lot of emphasis on genetic tendency and I tend to treat such things as neutral, and to look for information-based (normative and metaphysical) causes to behavior first.
While there are clear genetic differences in behavior between our tribes, I tend to look for normative answers not genetic ones. Usually they walk hand-in-hand.
BUT I DO NEED TO DEFEND AGAINST IT.
1) All Groups Must Act In Self Interest.
2) Cooperation is preferable to parasitism, is preferable to conquest, is preferable to extermination. And if we cannot engage in cooperation, you may NOT engage in parasitism, conquest or extermination.
3) No Guilt Ever. (Nor colonialism). Speak Truthfully. No Guilt.
4) The world cannot adopt our civilization, whether genetic, normative or both.
5) We cannot tolerate excessive dilution of our civilization, whether genetic normative or both.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 00:52:00 UTC
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/richard-dawkins/richard-dawkins-rape-tweets_b_5633885.html
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-30 23:58:00 UTC
THE LUNATIC FRINGE BRINGS IN THE HEAVY GUNS.
(defenders of pseudoscience and immorality unite)
Well, at least they have brought Walter to the table. And maybe he can put up a fight. But then, I know his argumentative structure cold. And while he is able to understand this level of argument, whether he will resort to critique like Kinsella, (who by comparison is a lightweight) is something I’m kind of curious about.
Aristocratic Egalitarianism: the only liberty that ever existed, will exist, or can.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-30 13:31:00 UTC
THE LUNATIC FRINGE BRINGS IN THE HEAVY GUNS.
(defenders of pseudoscience and immorality unite)
Well, at least they have brought Walter to the table. And maybe he can put up a fight. But then, I know his argumentative structure cold. 😉 And while he is able to understand this level of argument, whether he will resort to critique like Kinsella, (who by comparison is a lightweight) is something I’m kind of curious about.
Aristocratic Egalitarianism: the only liberty that ever existed, will exist, or can.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-30 13:11:00 UTC