British gun laws, hanging and Grand Juries:
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-28 20:21:00 UTC
British gun laws, hanging and Grand Juries:
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-28 20:21:00 UTC
FIGHTING: Is this true?
Watch videos on how white men fight. It’s interesting.
We evolved to fight in formation, using weapons. We are not impulsive. We have pacified much of our impulsive classes out of the gene pool. But we need weapons to fight with. We need to fight in groups. This is the secret to the evolution of western martial capability: technology plus cooperation.
Watch how fighting has changed due to the introduction of MMA. We pulled kicking from Asia, joints from Asia (low power techniques), wrestling from the west, and boxing from the west(high power techniques).
Watch how fighting has changed due to the popularization of fight videos.
Watch the emerging evidence that power makes over skill and endurance.
Fighting is evolving into little more than striking jaws with roundhouses. Meaning that white people need to carry weapons once again.
Africans have the most testosterone, are still impulsive, but they get such speed out of it, and they have amazing reach. It’s beautiful to watch them move. Africans are to fighting what white people are to ballet.
Africans don’t stop when you are down. And they seem to take much greater punishment before going down. More testosterone. They are less afraid of later retaliation?
Whites and asians do stop when you are down, and take less punishment. The purpose of our peoples is to stop the other. They are more afraid of later retaliation? (HBD Chick: is clannishness involved?)
Asians are definitely less sexually mature, that is the secret to their longevity. Africans more sexually mature. Human longevity will come from continuing humanity’s long process of extending sexual maturity. It wouldn’t hurt if we could find an appetite suppressant either.
This is not true of southeast asians, who are just a smaller, lighter, earlier version of man.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-28 04:52:00 UTC
THE VIRTUE OF HANGING
Unfortunately, the whole expansion of the franchised ruined our excellent ancient tradition of watching your words, through liberal use of the duel.
Unfortunately, the whole expansion of the franchise ruined our excellent tradition of telling the truth, by the dilution of libel and slander.
Unfortunately the whole post-slavery thing ruined our excellent ancient tradition of genetic pacification thru liberal application of hanging.
Unfortunately mass immigration ruined our excellent tradition of genetic pacification through sheriffs, posses, and civic duty of every man to defend the commons.
Too many unfortunate things for aristocracy to tolerate.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-27 11:00:00 UTC
EASTERN EUROPE HAD ANARCHY: AND THE PEOPLE SUFFERED FOR IT.
Yeah. My interest in anarchism evaporated after a few months living in Ukraine. Because Eastern Europe is where the cosmopolitan authors got their ideas. Anarchism is an ode to lost predation in the serfs of Eastern Europe just like James Bond is an ode to lost empire: they’re both fictions.
Voluntary everything is equivalent to Lawlessness. It is another great deception like Marxism and neoconservatism.
Liberty, meaning the ability to do as you with without imposing costs upon others, is a product of the rule of law. And the only principle means of decidability for law that can possibly produce a condition of liberty is the prohibition on the imposition of costs, which we express as property rights, and the scope of those rights evolves in parallel to the evolution of the means of imposing costs that is the product of the expansion of technologies, methods of cooperation, and the division of labor.
And me seek parasitism because it is much easier and more rewarding than production.
So a few moral men prohibit these parasitisms so that they and all can prosper.
They impose rule of law in an immoral population.
These men constitute the western aristocracy.
Rule of law. Nomocracy. The prohibition on the imposition of costs that result in free riding on the productivity of others.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-27 06:17:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/Do-rich-people-ever-fly-coach
https://www.quora.com/Do-rich-people-ever-fly-coach
[A]s far as I know: 1) The church served as a wealthy but weak professional administrative branch of government. 2) The church could grant moral authority to nobility and monarchy, or revoke it. Meaning that if revoked, your lands were marked for conquest by others. 3) The central tenet of christianity is the extension of kinship love to non-kin, breaking familial and tribal bonds. This is the only meaningful principle. It also happens to intuitively reflect hunter gatherer ethics and morality. 4) The church was able to legally enforce this policy by the prohibition on cousin marriage, and the grant of property rights to women. 5) While the church pursued these policies purely out of self interest: the removal of competition to the church as government, and the cheaper acquisition of lands, the net effect was to restore order to Celtica after the Roman destruction of Celtic Civilization and the impact of the migration period, and to provide sufficient administrative support that Saxon (north sea hanseatic) civilization could evolve into what we think of as Protestant Europe. There is nothing valuable at all in the literature. It is mere nonsense. The ‘good’ outcomes were the product of one principle ‘love’ and one institution: property rights under the common saxon law, administered by literate if ignorant clerks. Rome created a false history of european barbarism. The church, starting with Bede, has been successful in authoring a false history of Europe. Just as the “democratic era’ has authored a false history of Europe. Just as americans are being taught a false history of Europe. Economic history tells us differently. Aristocracy, sovereignty and Militita, Rule of Law, the common law of property, Extra-kinship love and high trust. These institutions produce the lowest transaction costs, and therefore highest possible economic velocity humans are capable of.
[W]hy They Don’t Care About You.
1) Search engines are more effective than friends lists.
2) And you don’t write in Arabic.
3) And you aren’t writing across borders.
4) They have better things to do.
I’ve been both a justice department employee, and on the C list in the past, and that hasn’t stopped the government from asking me for help.
RUSSIANS: The Russians work by buying influence with public intellectuals (people who write stuff). They play to egos. Russian ‘spies’ have the easiest job of all: find ‘useful idiots’. They are great at it.
CHINESE: The Chinese work by stealing info via blood relations in the states. They play to genetics, nationalism, racism, and the Chinese ‘chip on their shoulder’. They are very good at it.
MUSLIMS: The Muslims work by inciting violence with outcasts. They play to the contradiction between islam’s utopian promise and it’s evident contradiction in reality as the religion of the lower (lowest) classes. They are becoming reasonably good at it.
JEWS: The Jews work by using money to buy influence and by using their control of the media. They play of tribal common interest. They are very good at it.
AMERICANS: Americans work by gathering signal intelligence. They play off the distribution of american military, technical, financial, and commercial prowess to less developed countries, and discontent by the middle and upper middle classes in those countries.
Real ‘spies’ are very small in number. The simple ones are attache’s to embassies. The better are employees of foreign companies, or foreigners hired as employees of companies. Then there are just plain specialists who can be inserted into nearly any position as needed, and they develop
RELATIONSHIPS.
We all know how each group works. So we investigate each group by the means that group uses to organize.
So unless you start threatening the president, or specifically inciting violence you’re just another annoying malcontent. And there are a lot of you. And you’re little more than evidence of the superiority of our legal system’s ability to tolerate intellectual dissent, while at the same time prohibiting physical violence.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
[W]hy They Don’t Care About You.
1) Search engines are more effective than friends lists.
2) And you don’t write in Arabic.
3) And you aren’t writing across borders.
4) They have better things to do.
I’ve been both a justice department employee, and on the C list in the past, and that hasn’t stopped the government from asking me for help.
RUSSIANS: The Russians work by buying influence with public intellectuals (people who write stuff). They play to egos. Russian ‘spies’ have the easiest job of all: find ‘useful idiots’. They are great at it.
CHINESE: The Chinese work by stealing info via blood relations in the states. They play to genetics, nationalism, racism, and the Chinese ‘chip on their shoulder’. They are very good at it.
MUSLIMS: The Muslims work by inciting violence with outcasts. They play to the contradiction between islam’s utopian promise and it’s evident contradiction in reality as the religion of the lower (lowest) classes. They are becoming reasonably good at it.
JEWS: The Jews work by using money to buy influence and by using their control of the media. They play of tribal common interest. They are very good at it.
AMERICANS: Americans work by gathering signal intelligence. They play off the distribution of american military, technical, financial, and commercial prowess to less developed countries, and discontent by the middle and upper middle classes in those countries.
Real ‘spies’ are very small in number. The simple ones are attache’s to embassies. The better are employees of foreign companies, or foreigners hired as employees of companies. Then there are just plain specialists who can be inserted into nearly any position as needed, and they develop
RELATIONSHIPS.
We all know how each group works. So we investigate each group by the means that group uses to organize.
So unless you start threatening the president, or specifically inciting violence you’re just another annoying malcontent. And there are a lot of you. And you’re little more than evidence of the superiority of our legal system’s ability to tolerate intellectual dissent, while at the same time prohibiting physical violence.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
http://intersectionproject.eu/article/society/russians-searching-new-motherland
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-26 04:26:00 UTC