Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • YEST WESTERNERS DEVELOPED SOVEREIGNTY… BUT IT’S JUST A TECHNOLOGY THAT ANY TRI

    YEST WESTERNERS DEVELOPED SOVEREIGNTY… BUT IT’S JUST A TECHNOLOGY THAT ANY TRIBE CAN IMPORT.

    Every single tribe on this earth in every single race, within the current body we call homo-sapiens, wherein a sufficient pareto distribution of property can form under rule of law, can transition from man-animal, to human, to super-human, with nothing but generations, time and effort.

    Western man has given humanity many technologies because of its use of sovereignty. this is one more technology that all gorups can adopt. And if all groups adopt it, there will be no conflict, but there will also be no world government. Because we will have a distributed dictatorship of billions.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 09:29:00 UTC

  • I KNOW IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE (EVEN FOR ME), BUT I ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING

    I KNOW IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE (EVEN FOR ME), BUT I ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT.

    Sovereignty, Testimonialism, Propertarianism, Market Government, And Transcendent Domestication, constitute a complete philosophical system that unites science, biology, philosophy, morality, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy. It is the scientific articulation of European Aristocratic Egalitarianism and the explanation of the reason why the west out-performed the rest in both the ancient and modern worlds.

    It might SEEM that I am either crazy, eccentric, or peddling nonsense. And it is obvious that my work is heretical in the current era. But it is as important as the invention of empiricism, and will, if it survives, have as profound an impact on human life.

    By means of slight changes to the constitution we can, by force of rebellion, restore western civilization, in the current era, as much as empiricism and Darwinianism restored it under Christianity in the prior eras, and as much as Aristotelian reason codified the Aryan contractual and empirical metaphysical intuition in the ancient world.

    So while it is quite difficult to argue concepts of this nature with the common man, or even those with a college education, and remains challenging with the highly educated and the specialist, it’s not that I cannot defend my work from criticism. It’s that it is hard to find criticism rather than error, bias, wishful thinking, impulse, opinion, deceit, and rallying and shaming.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-27 08:35:00 UTC

  • TALEB AND DOOLITTLE ( by James Augustus Berens ) The problem: the scalability/sc

    TALEB AND DOOLITTLE

    ( by James Augustus Berens )

    The problem: the scalability/scope of cognition

    Methodology in identifying the problem: Causative (Curt) vs Mathematical (Taleb)

    Solution:

    Curt

    Anglo-empirical (tests/criticism + warranty)

    Force transactions to be fully informed, productive, warrantied, and voluntary. (This applies to information production as much as it does to trade)

    Vs

    Taleeb

    Aphoristic/Institutionalized Skepticism

    As far as I can tell, Taleeb understands the danger (negative externalities) of Scientism (pseudoscience), but he isn’t trying to reform the (social) sciences so that we can produce and act on warrantied information. Instead he wants to make institutions “idiot proof”/antifragile. He advocates implementing skin-in-the-game policies because he has skepticism of our ability to calculate at modern scale (who can blame him?), but he knows that will intuit their self-interest and act accordingly.

    In a way he is arguing that we create law so that we have a pre-modern experience and act-accordingly. This can be observed not only in his politics, but also in his diet and exercise program. Like many people on the right, he wants to go back to what we have observed to work.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 21:33:00 UTC

  • dammit people. i am writing software here. and you’re killin’ me. lol

    dammit people. i am writing software here. and you’re killin’ me. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 11:16:00 UTC

  • TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMA

    TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMALE’S HEN-STRATEGY”

    Today’s two insights, one beautiful, one horrifying.

    1) spirituality is important and the language of spirituality necessary for the purpose of organizing in groups by means of incentives. But we can write laws and argue cases in Propertarianism and we cannot do that in the language of Nietzche, and Junger.

    When people hear me they do not realize that I do not see the problem of our time as rallying ourselves toward common interests, because in my mind we do not know what to rally in favor of, and we do not know how to stop the opposition by formal and institutional means, nor to maintain our defenses against them over time.

    Just as truth is what remains after we eliminate all error bias and deceit, sovereignty and markets are all that remain, once we eliminate violence, theft, fraud, MISINFORMATION AND DECEIT.

    So of course, I speak in NEGATIVES used to PROSECUTE, whereas most men want POSITIVES with used to RALLY.

    So without this understanding, the ‘right’ which is intuitionistic rather than intellectual,

    2) IT’S DECIVILIZING FEMININE STRATEGY IN GENERAL THAT AILS US: The global battle is against democracy and media under free deceitful speech, which has given women both the distribution mechanism and the proxy violence to overthrow their domestication, rather than simply seek legal parity. We desire equals with whom to cooperate, and are largely happy to hold our positions, because we are men. But women are like hens, in that they will perpetually destroy each other and everyone around them in order to achieve dominance by any means possible. Men are not good. But markets including a market for commons allowed them to conduct exchanges and cooperate while maintaining order. Women are not good. They are never good except to their children. We made them good by denying them alternatives, and democracy let them free.

    If you want to be horrified by uncomfortable scientific truths, then that is the one you should be most horrified by.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:28:00 UTC

  • a long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away

    a long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away….

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 19:57:00 UTC

  • ( the more dependent the economy is on complex networks of production involving

    ( the more dependent the economy is on complex networks of production involving distributed capital, resources, and knowledge)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 13:39:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790910725665460224

    Reply addressees: @AltJewish

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790908477694697472

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790908477694697472

  • #tcot #conservative #newright #nrx

    https://t.co/HY6yVrD6Ty#tlot #tcot #conservative #newright #nrx

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 09:29:00 UTC

  • #tcot #conservative #nrx #newright

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/790894155425800192/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=790894155425800192#tlot #tcot #conservative #nrx #newright https://t.co/irdpRRfrbt

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 08:36:00 UTC

  • Wealth is not the same word as resource, and invest is not the same word as entr

    —Wealth is not the same word as resource, and invest is not the same word as entrust—

    This is true if and only if the resource and investment valued with equal emotion by all. But it isn’t.

    The fact that I eschew attempts at falsely stating a homogeneity of interests is why I use unloaded verse.

    Conversely, the reason people use loaded verse is to deceive: to cast as universal that which is particular

    So to an honest man wealth is a resource and entrust is an investment. A dishonest man moralizes instead.

    Commons are created by the surrender of opportunities for violence, theft, fraud, deceit, and free riding.

    Just as much as commons are created by the contribution of time, effort, and resources.

    Western High Trust Society was built by forgoing early marriage and reproduction, free riding, and deceit.

    Just as much as it was by the aggressive suppression of violence, theft, and fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 08:05:00 UTC