STOP DENYING WHO WE ARE I mean, you can choose: Western sovereignty by which we and humanity profit from our incremental transformation of man from impulsive animal into human with agency in the pursuit of sovereignty for all, or the Semitic, Persian profit from the expansion of the underclass and the continuous devolution of man. Or the Chinese authoritarian version that seems to always end in stagnation. Only one of these models has served to raise man out of ignorance and poverty in the bronze, iron, and steel, ages, That’s the west. Stop denying who we are. We are the people who domesticated the animal man for fun and profit by breeding for agency, such that with agency we can produce a population of sovereigns – equal among the gods. Every group of humans can take this strategy if they choose.
Form: Short Note
-
We Have Given The Left Enough Rope. #Conservative #Libertarian #tlot #tcot #Trum
We Have Given The Left Enough Rope. #Conservative #Libertarian #tlot #tcot #Trump @MartianHoplite #NewRight https://t.co/XpkNiDRiox
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-25 18:26:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/845703358908391424
-
FBI Finds Alt Right Talking Treason?
Huh. I thought restoring the constitution to natural law was an obligation mandated by the framers, and the very reason for the constitution and the second amendment. As far as I know, under natural law, the constitition of which is an expression, any act against those institutions that undermines natural law, rule of law, is de facto an act of treason. if instead, the government is limited only by what the mass of voters and the houses of government rule, then government is purely arbitrary.
-
FBI Finds Alt Right Talking Treason?
Huh. I thought restoring the constitution to natural law was an obligation mandated by the framers, and the very reason for the constitution and the second amendment. As far as I know, under natural law, the constitition of which is an expression, any act against those institutions that undermines natural law, rule of law, is de facto an act of treason. if instead, the government is limited only by what the mass of voters and the houses of government rule, then government is purely arbitrary.
-
Have Given The Left Enough Rope. #Conservative #Libertarian #tlot #tcot #Trump @
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/845703358908391424/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=845703358908391424We Have Given The Left Enough Rope. #Conservative #Libertarian #tlot #tcot #Trump @MartianHoplite #NewRight https://t.co/XpkNiDRiox
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-25 14:26:00 UTC
-
DEAR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT A) Please come for me. Please give me even more credibil
DEAR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
A) Please come for me. Please give me even more credibility, and expand my market dramatically.
B) Please expand the opportunity for promoting discourse on rule of law and the solution to the next iteration of european governments.
C) Please ensure that the income source necessary to fund any revolution (a foreign government) will provide for a revolution.
Once you tried to destroy me procedurally, you made me an enemy, and I made it my mission to ensure that rule of law is restored, so that never again can a man be harmed by the arbitrary judgement of individuals prior to juridical review, under rule of law, under natural law, of universal standing, and universal applicability – without exception.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-25 13:44:00 UTC
-
Molyneux (Moulineaux) and Doolittle (De Dolietta) are anglicizations of Norman (
Molyneux (Moulineaux) and Doolittle (De Dolietta) are anglicizations of Norman (French) names. The Moulineux’s originate from the Siene river farther east, and De Dolietta from further west near Avranches.
It’s gotta be genetic.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-24 14:42:00 UTC
-
GOOD, HAD TO RE-SHARE
https://propertarianism.com/2016/12/09/correcting-aristotles-categories-of-philosophy/SO GOOD, HAD TO RE-SHARE
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-24 12:44:00 UTC
-
Two Statements on Women.
WOMEN AND GENGHIS KHAN We do not stop Genghis Khan from his parasitism by moral demand, but by eliminating his ability to conduct parasitism. We do not stop women from their natural preening, consumption, nesting, parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution, and undermining the power structure by engaging them in moral argument. They lack the agency to do so. You simply create institutions that prohibit them from parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution and undermining the power structure. You deny people opportunity for rational parasitism, you don’t convince them not to engage in it. WOMEN AND THE FRANCHISE I take the opposite position: that we have merely given women the proxy of violence that we call government without providing the same disincentives to abusing it as women do, that we have created for men over thousands of years, as men do. Women do damage via different means than do men. Yet we did not limit their ability to do damage. So we can say our experiment in enfranchisement has failed, or we can improve our institutions such that the even more destructive intuitions of women cannot be let loose by the violence of government under the franchise. (Eli has me thinking about solutions rather than criticisms)
-
Two Statements on Women.
WOMEN AND GENGHIS KHAN We do not stop Genghis Khan from his parasitism by moral demand, but by eliminating his ability to conduct parasitism. We do not stop women from their natural preening, consumption, nesting, parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution, and undermining the power structure by engaging them in moral argument. They lack the agency to do so. You simply create institutions that prohibit them from parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution and undermining the power structure. You deny people opportunity for rational parasitism, you don’t convince them not to engage in it. WOMEN AND THE FRANCHISE I take the opposite position: that we have merely given women the proxy of violence that we call government without providing the same disincentives to abusing it as women do, that we have created for men over thousands of years, as men do. Women do damage via different means than do men. Yet we did not limit their ability to do damage. So we can say our experiment in enfranchisement has failed, or we can improve our institutions such that the even more destructive intuitions of women cannot be let loose by the violence of government under the franchise. (Eli has me thinking about solutions rather than criticisms)