Form: Short Note

  • I can teach you the natural law. This is a technical category of knowledge. Accu

    I can teach you the natural law. This is a technical category of knowledge. Accumulating the wisdom to know why it is true will take quite a bit of reading.

    Now, I would prefer, that you did not take natural law on faith, explanatory power, argumentative power, discovery, and decidability power, but understood, because of your wisdom, why the alternative propositions have all failed.

    But that said, if you take it purely on the evidence of the explanatory, argumentative, discovery, and decidability power it provides you then you will compete more successfully in life, and contribute to the restoration of your people.

    If you take it on faith, I suppose that is good for you and good for us. But then this defeats the purpose of natural law. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 09:49:00 UTC

  • Because I work from the presumption of information as the model, and that Hayek

    Because I work from the presumption of information as the model, and that Hayek discovered this, and Popper partly discovered the means of working with it, and that Turing told us how to work with it, and that our founding fathers attempted to construct a constitution of natural law, but all of these people only partly succeeded, they are my influences, they key to which was provided me by Hoppe’s use of property as providing perfect commensurability (which I state reciprocity).

    All other philosophers I refer to, I do so to describe how our knowledge evolved despite their minor successes and major failures.

    I view philosophy as dead. A literature for those who cannot command a science.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 09:12:00 UTC

  • Let me help you. higher latitude, distance from water, and heterogeneity of peop

    Let me help you. higher latitude, distance from water, and heterogeneity of peoples, work against your civilization. Europe was easier for warrior aristocracy to colonize. the levant worse. Diversity is your enemy. Cool climes, proximity to water and waterways, and a homogeneity of people improve your chances.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 09:05:00 UTC

  • THE CAUSAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIVILIZATIONS Let me help you. Your civilization w

    THE CAUSAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIVILIZATIONS

    Let me help you. Your civilization will advance or stagnate or die by the single criteria of the available vehicles for males to compete in order to increase their status and therefore position in the dominance hierarchy, and therefore attraction to women for sex and men for followers and opportunities to exploit.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 09:00:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a photo

    Curt Doolittle shared a photo.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-30 08:41:00 UTC

  • CUNNING SOLVES NOTHING IN TESTIMONY, ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS I try not to

    CUNNING SOLVES NOTHING IN TESTIMONY, ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS

    I try not to be ‘cunning’. I try to determine (a) what is true, and (b) what is the equivalent of true: objectively moral under the test of reciprocity. Every cunning can be met with an equal and opposite cunning and therefore is just an expression of taste. By contrast, true, moral, and possible can only be met by false, immoral, and impossible.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 08:21:00 UTC

  • (added Simon Ström)

    (added Simon Ström)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 17:35:00 UTC

  • There are very good reasons that Justinian and Constantine, from the safety of B

    There are very good reasons that Justinian and Constantine, from the safety of Byzantium, used Syrian and Judaic thought to attack the Greek and Roman Institutions of learning.

    They did it with malice, intent, and forethought, and while it is true that islam caused the ECONOMIC dark age, the SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL dark age is impossible to divorce from the rise and fall of Christianity. That’s just the evidence. I don’t see any ‘good’ in christianity that was not in roman and greek thought prior to christianity: Aryanism.

    Lies: false promises of utopia in an afterlife, like false promises of economic and status equality, are cheap means of government and parasitism.

    Rule, using Rule of Law by Natural Law, under the promise of violence, in exchange for taxation (commissions) for the creation of increasingly profitable markets is about as truthful as one can get, for the simple reason that it contains no via-positiva promises, and leaves choice of pursuits to the ruled.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 17:26:00 UTC

  • NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE

    NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE AND DECIET

    Um. No. Islam’s destroyed almost all the works of the greeks and romans that they could find. And the reintroduction of greek and roman literature into europe occurred as the academics who were about to be persecuted by the muslims fled to the west for safety.

    Islam, the Black Blague from China, are followed by communism, the mongol golden horde, as the greatest dealers of death. That means that between Abraham’s Judaism, Christianity, and Islamism, and Abraman’s new religion: the Cosmopolitianism of the Ashkenazi (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School, and) that Abrahamism is the most deadly plague every to face humanity. Even MORE SO than the black plague.

    A disease of the mind – from ‘polluted minds’, and a disease of the body (‘from polluted lands’), together are more deadly than any combination of wars in history.

    If we can struggle to end physical diseases, why do we not equally struggle to end informational diseases?

    We can. Natural Law’s Testimonial Truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:21:00 UTC

  • The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and

    The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and (b) degree of civilization.

    In practice we should see Aryanism (markets for rule) expandable only into areas that did not have the ability to expand the underclass, and did not possess a large underclass, and face little tribal conflict.

    Conversely we should see the worst behavior among peoples who have expansive underclasses, the agrarian or pastoral ability to expand those underclasses, and lots of territorial competition from other kin groups.

    And that is what we see


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:24:00 UTC