Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • So wait. The evidence is coming in consistently now. And it turns out that the p

    So wait. The evidence is coming in consistently now. And it turns out that the people we call Teutons, but really are just undiluted, and manorialized aryans (Yamna), really are in fact the superior subrace?

    Oh. OMG. That’s…. that’s gonna suck. Really. Seriously.

    I mean. My little celtic-anglo-saxon-norman backside is just not gonna enjoy that bit of propaganda war.

    Well, I have no problem being ruled by my betters.

    It’s the people who aren’t my betters that bother me. 😉

    Can we get a german or dutch monarch over here please????

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 15:26:00 UTC

  • Two years ago, I could only quote one or two followers, once in awhile. Today I

    Two years ago, I could only quote one or two followers, once in awhile. Today I can quote any number of followers multiple times a day.

    It works. Discipline. Persistence. Hard work. Commitment. We build a revolution in thought and in rule, one idea and one conversation at a time.

    We negotiate the only possible terms of the militia of sovereign men, one day, one debate, one test, at a time.

    And slowly, from our most subtle intuitions that ‘something is not right with this world’, we produce a solution, a plan, understanding, conviction, and the spark of action.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 15:09:00 UTC

  • A COMMON DECEPTION VIA FRAMING What is the best for humanity: rule of law under

    A COMMON DECEPTION VIA FRAMING

    What is the best for humanity: rule of law under natural law – meaning non discretionary rule, or one of the variants of discretionary rule: Authoritarian Martial/Fascism, Authoritarian Oligarchical/Liberalism, Authoritarian Syndicate/Social(ism) Democracy, Authoritarian Underclass/Communism?

    I mean. If you ask the question honestly, in operational language, then the answer is pretty obvious. The best rule is by NO ONE but rule of law.

    The question becomes, how then do we construct commons when no one can rule?

    The answer looks increasingly like the swiss model.

    However, that’s assuming you can get rid of the underclasses that destroy any hope of ‘doing what is good for humanity’.

    And that’s the dirty problem of all political systems.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 13:51:00 UTC

  • You know, I work on these ‘seven theses’ of Propertarianism, and it’s … it’s a

    You know, I work on these ‘seven theses’ of Propertarianism, and it’s … it’s a lot more like math or programming. Where you’re trying to figure out how to do something. And you try this and that and the other thing over and over again, and they don’t work. And then… And then you finally get the ‘equation-algorithim’ to work and you look at it. You hold it up – all proud. And you look around and say “Look mom! Look what I made!”. But ’cause it’s all formal, and declarative like a legal pronouncement, it sounds all pompous and high-falutin’. And everyone thinks you’re smart and stuff. And I giggle at that irony. And that irony never goes away. ‘Cause really. It’s just a whole lotta trial and error. A lotta work with the crayons of reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 19:14:00 UTC

  • I don’t understand the whole summer-alcohol thing. Water, Teas, coffees, fruit d

    I don’t understand the whole summer-alcohol thing. Water, Teas, coffees, fruit drinks, but alcohol in summer during the day? damn.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 19:04:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 18:00:00 UTC

  • AFAIK the religion question is solved. We can know the general method of how all

    AFAIK the religion question is solved. We can know the general method of how all the services can be provided without falsehoods. What anyone wants to construct out of that, well, thats like editing a collection of stories for different audiences. So I don’t have to say what religion must be, only what it must not be: ergo, via negativa rules.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 10:46:00 UTC

  • Makes me so mad. Roman is out training guys in the woods to fight for their coun

    Makes me so mad. Roman is out training guys in the woods to fight for their country. They pay money to be trained. They buy their own equipment. They pack together in trains and cars to drive to the front. They creep around in dirt in a war zone and kill invaders with knives in the night. They hold the airport in brutal close combat. They fight and die for their country. Because they want to be free of corruption. And some stupid shit anglo attributes his behavior to global politics….

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 10:34:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/06/15/ukraines-ultra-right-militias-are-challenging-the-government-to-a-showdown/

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 23:49:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 23:02:00 UTC