Form: Short Note

  • We must cause enough insurrection at home that the foreign contingents of the mi

    We must cause enough insurrection at home that the foreign contingents of the military return home and create opportunity in the rest of the world, that the remaining west must defend against. The only way to restore the west is to restore the many armies of the west, and the many militias with it.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 10:53:00 UTC

  • As a longer term bit of strategy, I want the movement to be less about me, and m

    —As a longer term bit of strategy, I want the movement to be less about me, and more about the team and the idea. My agenda was to create a counter to the frankfurt school – a sort of ‘New Inquisition” against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. A ‘cult’ of Prosecutors of Natural Law. And a group of specialists that provide historical expertise as needed to assist those prosecutors. So I would prefer to ‘go to market’ with that example, rather than just relying on myself. The purpose of the prosecutors is to function as a court that licenses the ‘activists’ to ‘act’. I do not want to be a gate nor do I want a movement dependent upon me. I will be gone eventually. The movement must persist. —


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 07:41:00 UTC

  • ( Woman explaining to me that when “The Moon is Blue” was released, the Catholic

    ( Woman explaining to me that when “The Moon is Blue” was released, the Catholics had to go to confession after seeing it. )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 06:51:00 UTC

  • WHY OTHER SUCCEED HERE BUT WE CAN’T THERE. —“I’ve done a couple of psychologic

    WHY OTHER SUCCEED HERE BUT WE CAN’T THERE.

    —“I’ve done a couple of psychological studies on cultural trust. I think this IQ to Trust ratio is why Asians succeed when transplanted into white cultures, but the same can’t be said for the inverse.”—Daniel Travis


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 21:18:00 UTC

  • My contribution is that I have incorporated costs, full accounting, and operatio

    My contribution is that I have incorporated costs, full accounting, and operationalism into philosophy, and produced a system of categories by which we can algorithmically ‘calculate’ (not compute) tests of reciprocity – including the reciprocity of truthful speech. This is far harder than logic (set consistency), and far harder than empiricism (external correspondence). But it is just as formal as logic and mathematics.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 18:22:00 UTC

  • As luxury (wealth) increases people can increase radius of externalities that th

    As luxury (wealth) increases people can increase radius of externalities that they consider. This is why nations do not worry about pollution until they have to, and once they have to they turn it into a virtue. In the west we are so deep in luxury our primary trade is in virtue signals – the most egregious demonstration of conspicuous consumption. Conspicuous altruism is conspicuous consumption – usually wherever other pay the cost of their altruism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 17:53:00 UTC

  • RATIO OF IQ TO TRUST You know, we talk about IQ all the time. But of IQ and trus

    RATIO OF IQ TO TRUST

    You know, we talk about IQ all the time. But of IQ and trust, which is more important? Well, it looks like you need both.

    And that’s the problem. others have produced IQ. We produced both. That’s the issue.

    I mean, I”m sure if I think about it, then it’s something I should be able to find empirical support for.

    In the end the cause of trust is the militia and homogeneity.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 17:07:00 UTC

  • KICKED OUT OF MOLYNEUX’S GROUP. Not exactly sure why other than saying he’s a gr

    KICKED OUT OF MOLYNEUX’S GROUP.

    Not exactly sure why other than saying he’s a great teacher, good analyst, but failed philosopher. And that he was a slow mover to the right.

    Moderator says I should call in. Followers say it would be unfair to Moly to debate him unprepared. I agreed and said so. I said that it would take me most of an hour to walk him through enough context. And that it would be boring or tedious for the audience. And that if he was a bit prepared, then he could carry on the conversation while maintaining his audience. So AFAIK, I was doing the right thing.

    Moderator says something along the lines of “if you’re so smart how come you’re not as successful?” Which I find strange because I’ve dominated in business, and I’m doing quite well in philosophy. But that said, I mean, how many philosophers of science or law have Moly’s audience (none), how many subscribers to the journal Science are there? (50k). I mean, does that mean that popularity determines truth content? Of course not. It’s usually the opposite, right?

    Now, I don’t know who the moderator is (DiMarco maybe?) but he found all of this offensive and apparently booted me.

    My ask was only that I would like to move Moly the rest of the way, but that it was unfair to do it by just calling in. As far as I know that’s just the moral thing to do.

    So maybe I switch tactics and go after Moly’s “Therapy Cult” and just deal with it until he debates me.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 12:47:00 UTC

  • Rome over extended. The peoples surrounding her seized opportunity. one of those

    Rome over extended. The peoples surrounding her seized opportunity. one of those peoples was the germanic tribes, another was the eastern orthodox empire, another was the arabs (muslims), another was the jews (christians). Eastern empire did not suppress the christians and allowed the lies of the semites to take root among the folly of women, the slaves, and the underclass. When it was protected it spread like a virus. THen it was imposed as a means of circumventing AND DEFEATING the european aristocracy.

    That’s what happened. Just as aristocracy is being circumvented today.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 11:31:00 UTC

  • As I continue my work, I generally think more in terms of conflation and deflati

    As I continue my work, I generally think more in terms of conflation and deflation. I’m not against religion – i think it’s necessary. I’m against falsehood. And that’s because falsehood is not necessary – and the consequences of it are terrible.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 09:17:00 UTC