Follow me a bit longer. Because in my proposition, the primary new cost is truth. The primary new benefit is dramatic reduction in parasitism upon you and work you must provide. And there is nothing obtained by redistribution that is not paid for. And the payment for non contribution is merely non reproduction – not suffering.
(worth expanding and repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-02 12:21:00 UTC
I think Zachary Davidson is objecting to my PROCESS, which consists of iterative attempts to construct proofs of existential possibility or impossibility, and to attract criticism, and to repeat, until by using a competition between the proofs of possibility and impossibility, and criticism, only the possible (truth candidates remain). And that’s just how science works through iterative exploration.
Because all he is criticizing is my use of contrasts and measurements to quash ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism and deceit.
And he is criticizing that effort in order to preserve the utility of lying on the one hand and the use of lie and ritual to produce chemical reward, and the addiction behavior that is produced by self deception, and then avoidance of the combination of un-anchoring, cost of abandoning intuition (the animal), relief from the burden of reason, relief from the burden of learning, relief from the burden of adaptation, relief from the burden of constant reorganization of cooperation.
I mean. He works hard to preserve the lie and the feeling of success he gets from the lie, in contrast to his competitive success in reality. In other words, he wants to find escape from evidence of his reproductive disutility, and reward for it. He wants to make a failing a virtue.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-02 12:17:00 UTC
http://qz.com/778767/to-tell-someone-theyre-wrong-first-tell-them-how-theyre-right/VERY MUCH WORTH READING. FOR EVERYONE.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-02 11:47:00 UTC
( Interesting feed. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 12:48:00 UTC
DRIVEN BY GENES, ELEPHANT OR RIDER?
False assumption.
Neither a top down or bottom up hierarchy.
Instead the competition between impulses, intuition(searching), and reasoning (comparing), creates a MARKET for SUCCESS that is gradually captured by genes (impulses), intuition(memory), and reason(expertise).
Intertemporal division of cognitive labor.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 12:27:00 UTC
Last one.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 11:21:00 UTC
This and one more. Touches on some things, evolutionary.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 11:21:00 UTC
WORLD NEOTONIC SELECTION RESULTS
Some white women are better than all other woman. Many east asian women are better than all the remaining women. Some (white) indian women are better than all the remaining women. After that it’s a random distribution. The problem is that the undomesticated peoples have too little neotonic selection. White people have probably peaked with a balance tilting male. Slavic have peaked with a balance tilting female. And the east asians have passed the peak and taken it too far so that not enough ‘male’ remains. This is slightly beneficial for their women and punitive for their men. Unfortunately, while men favor selection for neoteny, women do NOT. And women’s selection preference is regressive (recidivist).
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 09:41:00 UTC
(the purpose of idealism in mathematics is to simplify discourse given the problem of scale independence. In other words, math has a ‘quaint’ vocabulary the purpose of which is to simplify the problem of prevarication when discussing subjects of scale independence. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-30 10:43:00 UTC
( I work in public for a reason. There is no value in working in public other than to attract good criticism – and trying to falsify it, defend against it, adapt to it, or include it. The problem is, that there is very little good criticism. And there are a lot of people passionate about delivering bad stupid or ridiculous attempts at criticism.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-30 09:26:00 UTC