RT @justinamash: End civil asset forfeiture.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 07:38:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697514335826858068
RT @justinamash: End civil asset forfeiture.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 07:38:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697514335826858068
RT @VDAREJamesK: The ADL has been tirelessly working to destroy this platform to make sure that there is even less free speech. They don’t…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 07:29:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697512084798394497
RT @whatifalthist: There are two lessons of the 20th century.
A)The Enlightenment and science didn’t change us from being crazy monkeys w…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 03:42:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697454768698835383
IT’S FINALLY HAPPENING.
(Thank you god)
I was pretty sure the intermarium would provide a counter-point to the decadence of the western Europeans. The Russians have done us the favor of committing suicide, reforming the Germans, moving the power structure of Europe east, and adding an agrarian powerhouse of Ukraine to the European market.
https://t.co/Hg0m3h4npe
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 01:04:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697415055350894592
FEMININE IN-TIME VS MASCULINE OVER-TIME
I need to work a little harder at converting the discourse from:
1. Feminine vs. Masculine
2. … and Feels vs. Reals
3. … … to Empathizing vs. Systematizing
4. … … … and to In-Time vs. Over Time.
Because feels vs reals is categorical, and empathizing vs systematizing is experiential, but they are the RESULT of our cognitive division of labor between in-time vs over-time. And it’s easier to ask women to think about over time than to talk to them about ‘reality’, by asking what will happen over time than accuse them of shallowness and emotionality.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 21:33:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697362093811417089
“PRIVATE CRYPTO VS FEDCOINS”
Cryptos are resistant to devaluation. Fedcoins will be devalued because devaluation is a necessary tool of monetary policy that prevents rent-seeking by savers via interest to consumers.
So it depends which crypto we’re talking about. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 21:23:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697359378200899745
Reply addressees: @GracianoGreen @jamesob @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697338005965472228
(Worth Repeating)
Either way, fedcoin and more is going to happen as I said. And the incentive structure will be expressed in policy as I’ve said. And so we must start exercising the class action system on a number of fronts in self-defense against that deterministic future – and do so while the court will agree with us; having returned to common concurrent textual law, and away from the deleterious consequences of activist and positive law that made a catastrophe of our institutions and society over the last eighty years .
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 20:25:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697344786020069377
I love these illustrations that show just how complex organic and messy the neural architecture is. You know, muscles make sense – there is an order. Neural microcolums, columns, regions, and the six major circuits of the brain make sense. But down there in the dendtite,… https://twitter.com/AlainChedotal/status/1697280374152249355
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 16:48:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697290326682063089
Evolution doesn’t care about you. Your existence serves only reproduction, or consumption of world resources, if you don’t reproduce but consume you are a dead weight on humanity, the planet, and the universe. Any joy you experience while doing so is the return on your not wasting resources with your pointless existence, in other words feel free to enjoy the ride if you first pay for it. Otherwise you’re just stealing from the rest of us,
Reply addressees: @MaeBlight_ @830atDorsia
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 03:20:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697086828317196288
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697075475523244435
The work we do at the Natural Law Institute is very complex, tedious, and difficult. And while our prose may seem a bit stilted and formal, that’s because it’s far closer to mathematics than to ordinary language. And that prose obscures the complexity of the work behind what we say. Because BEFORE we put all the effort into making our work accessible, it was obviously complex, tedious, difficult, and almost incomprehensible. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 17:40:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696940861517352961