Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • MORE AI THOUGHTS What made my early 80’s Artificial Intelligence design differen

    MORE AI THOUGHTS

    What made my early 80’s Artificial Intelligence design different at the time was storing information (knowledge) as ‘stories’: before during and after, where ‘during’ consisted of sets of before-during-after stories of opportunity, action reward(cost). Where ‘during’ consisted of actions that were possible and the costs. And where the ‘root’ or lowest ‘during’ was a single action.

    Now, this a very simple way of using three pointers to store full grammars in terms that were ‘understandable’ and ‘auditable’ to humans.

    And while that was a very simple method of creating symbolic networks, and in assembly language very fast, the principle is still the same: if AI’s are limited to expression of grammars in human language terms, they avoid the pitfalls of mathematical transformations and set transformations that are not symbolically auditable. In other words, you generate an ai that acts operationally instead of by formula. YOu would think it would be slower but it isn’t. If it needs to be faster and use ‘math’ then that is a problem of symbol creation in hardware not symbol comparison in software.

    Why does this matter? Because propertarianism provides the answer to moral ai design.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 20:19:00 UTC

  • MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women

    MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES

    Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women are far more scarce for men than men are for women.

    And 1/3 of men have little or little or no market value at all.

    More than half of women are not insignificantly crazy.

    For men, children and women are an investment, and without them your life will be shorter and the later parts of it far less pleasant if not sad. If you have to choose, have as many children as you can pay attention to. You can trade women. But you cannot trade children.

    It is easier for women to find work in the easy and clean jobs, and easier for men to find work in the hard and dirty jobs.

    It is easier for women to integrate into new social groups as they get older.

    It is far harder for men to integrate into social groups as they get older.

    It is hard for women to ‘get things done’ as they get older.

    It is hard for men to take care of themselves as they get older.

    We are desperately short of men’s monasteries, secular monasteries, and regimental barracks (monasteries) than we need to be. And those changes can only occur if we are able to employ right of disassociation (requiring very specific kinship ties for membership)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:58:00 UTC

  • WE DO IT TOGETHER You see, the more value I add, the better people and comments

    WE DO IT TOGETHER

    You see, the more value I add, the better people and comments I attract, then together the better people and comments we attract, and the more skill we develop in articulating ideas – it’s a self fulfilling strategy.

    And now it is not uncommon at all to quote and promote others many times a day.

    Most people wanna share articles, ridicule, images, and memes.

    We create and distribute arguments and ideas.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:46:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENCES IN LEFT AND RIGHT ARGUMENTS? “In order to obscure or justify or

    THE DIFFERENCES IN LEFT AND RIGHT ARGUMENTS?

    “In order to obscure or justify or force an involuntary transfer, or prohibit the imposition of an involuntary behavioral cost, the LEFT uses…” (argumentative tactic)

    — vs.–

    “In order to prevent an involuntary transfer and impose an involuntary behavioral cost, the RIGHT uses…” (argumentative tactic)

    The left lacks agency physical, emotional, and intellectual. The right possesses agency: physical, emotional, intellectual.

    (thanks to Skye Stewart)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:32:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY AND DUTY Since today’s little spat with a libertarian was another ex

    SOVEREIGNTY AND DUTY

    Since today’s little spat with a libertarian was another example of how libertarians are using abrahamic pilpul to make excuses for their attempts to circumvent costs of commons I thought I would point out the obvious: that sovereignty cannot exist without duty of reciprocity.

    In other words, no rights are possible without corresponding obligations: reciprocity.

    In other words, you cannot possess sovereignty unless you are willing to fight for your own and that of others.

    Anarchists of any kind, seek precisely that escape.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:14:00 UTC

  • GOAL: EMPOWERING YOU Just to hammer home the point, my original intention was to

    GOAL: EMPOWERING YOU

    Just to hammer home the point, my original intention was to create a value neutral language for the articulation and comparison of group, political, moral and ethical differences.

    So that I try to do by *defining series* – to articulate causal relations that are not possible with using terminological *ideal types*.

    So I hope to be able to arm you and the many like you with terms, series, and their relations (concepts), so that those ideas you ‘intuit but have difficulty expressing’ can be expressed with greater ease.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:07:00 UTC

  • ROUGH ESTIMATION OF IMMIGRATION MAXIMUMS For a high trust population: Total mino

    ROUGH ESTIMATION OF IMMIGRATION MAXIMUMS

    For a high trust population:

    Total minority(non kin) population in single digits. No minority greater than three percent.

    I’m trying to falsify it and I can’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:01:00 UTC

  • ENDING TRADITIONALIST AND LIBERTINE FALSEHOODS (the middle class lies) The sourc

    ENDING TRADITIONALIST AND LIBERTINE FALSEHOODS

    (the middle class lies)

    The source of western civilization is heroism > sovereignty > oath/jury/rule of law > markets in everything.

    Upon the development of slavery (agriculture esp) the concept of freedom was developed. and freedom could be earned.

    Upon the development of cities, we see a middle class seek the equivalent of sovergitny (liberty) and it evolves in the literature.

    Upon the development of christian monarchies, we see the demand for liberty (preservation of local custom and rule).

    Upon the rise of the middle classes we see the develoment of liberty (freedom from arbitrary rule)

    Upon the rise of marxism we see the development of libertarianism (freedom from involuntary commons production)

    This is “True” as far as I know, and does not allow for the conflation of terms.

    What a person who is and excuse-maker does, is to try to preserve various frauds and conveniences rather than modify his arguments and language and speech to reflect the most truthful statements possible – thereby preventing further contamination of the informational commons

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 14:48:00 UTC

  • WHEN YOU SAY THE WEST IS LIBERTARIAN (middle class burgher) RATHER THAN ARISTOCR

    WHEN YOU SAY THE WEST IS LIBERTARIAN (middle class burgher) RATHER THAN ARISTOCRATIC (upper class military)…

    ….I’m saying that you’re using the term liberty (absent duty of

    reciprocity in defense) and backdating it to sovereignty (including duty of reciprocity in defense) in order to continue the falsehood that what you call the condition of liberty is possible by other than militial reciprocal insurance by every man in the franchise without substitution, to a degree that is determined by market demands, producing commons to a degree that is determined by market demands, and that exit is to exit the duty (Payment) for returns of sovereignty.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 14:34:00 UTC

  • Huh

    Huh

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 11:42:00 UTC