Form: Short Note

  • Newt: Maybe you aren’t up on current events, but *we WANT the state/academy/medi

    Newt: Maybe you aren’t up on current events, but *we WANT the state/academy/media to defeat him – and start civil war* @newtgingrich @POTUS


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 13:51:00 UTC

  • BE A MAKER OF HISTORY – NOT THE VICTIM OF IT Don’t be a douchebag. Listen. It ta

    BE A MAKER OF HISTORY – NOT THE VICTIM OF IT

    Don’t be a douchebag. Listen. It takes about six hours, including research, planning, and prep time for one man to immobilize a city of 50-60K people for one to three days.

    Now, I have a job. I am doing my job. My job is creating the set of demands that can be implemented to produce political change. I do more good at this job than that job. But there are plenty of people that are better at that job than my job. And they could divide that six hours over a work week, and five or six of those can guys take out a whole city – continuously.

    Why am I saying this? So that people start thinking about transitioning from propagandizing to action. And so that we can cast out the people who won’t act act. Wars of words are over. There is only one solution left, and that is civil war.

    Your civilization needs you. So be a maker of history, or disappear from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 13:07:00 UTC

  • WIKI IS PRETTY ACCURATE ON PIE: The following basic traits of the Proto-Indo-Eur

    WIKI IS PRETTY ACCURATE ON PIE:

    The following basic traits of the Proto-Indo-Europeans and their environment are widely agreed upon but still hypothetical due to their reconstructed nature:

    – Pastoralism, including domesticated cattle, horses, and dogs

    – Agriculture and cereal cultivation, including technology commonly ascribed to late-Neolithic farming communities, e.g., the plow

    – A climate with winter snow.

    – Transportation by or across water.

    – The solid wheel, used for wagons, but not yet chariots with spoked wheels

    – Worship of a sky god, *dyeus ph2tēr (lit. “sky father”; > Sanskrit Dyaus Pita, > Ancient Greek Ζεύς (πατήρ) / Zeus (patēr); vocative *dyeu-ph2ter > Latin Iūpiter; Illyrian Deipaturos)

    – Oral heroic poetry or song lyrics that used stock phrases such as imperishable fame and wine-dark sea

    – A patrilineal kinship-system based on relationships between men

    The Proto-Indo-Europeans relied largely on agriculture, but partly on animal husbandry, notably of cattle and sheep.

    They had domesticated horses – *eḱwos (cf. Latin equus). The cow (*gwous) played a central role, in religion and mythology as well as in daily life.

    A man’s wealth would have been measured by the number of his animals (small livestock), *peḱu (cf. English fee, Latin pecunia).

    As for technology, reconstruction indicates a culture of the late Neolithic bordering on the early Bronze Age, with tools and weapons very likely composed of “natural bronze” (i.e., made from copper ore naturally rich in silicon or arsenic). Silver and gold were known, but not silver smelting (as PIE has no word for lead, a by-product of silver smelting), thus suggesting that silver was imported. Sheep were kept for wool, and textiles were woven. The wheel was known, certainly for ox-drawn wagons.

    They practiced a polytheistic religion centered on sacrificial rites, probably administered by a priestly caste.

    Burials in barrows or tomb chambers apply to the Kurgan culture, in accordance with the original version of the Kurgan hypothesis, but not to the previous Sredny Stog culture, which is also generally associated with PIE. Important leaders would have been buried with their belongings in kurgans, and possibly also with members of their households or wives (human sacrifice, suttee).

    Many Indo-European societies know a threefold division of priests, a warrior class, and a class of peasants or husbandmen. Georges Dumézil has suggested such a division for Proto-Indo-European society.

    If there was a separate class of warriors, it probably consisted of single young men. They would have followed a separate warrior code unacceptable in the society outside their peer-group. Traces of initiation rites in several Indo-European societies suggest that this group identified itself with wolves or dogs (see also Berserker, werewolf).


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 11:36:00 UTC

  • As far as I understand, early humans evolved from fearful cautious creatures, fo

    As far as I understand, early humans evolved from fearful cautious creatures, followed the water round the world, followed the wildlife inland, and that what we found from tribal steppe, and desert pastoral life, is an increasing aggressiveness and impulsivity, and what we found from northern agrarian life was greater docility (patience). This mirrors the testosterone, dimorphism, and neoteny evidence. Peak human is somewhere in the past I suspect.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 11:14:00 UTC

  • THE DOWNSIDE OF ‘MARKETS IN EVERYTHING’ The west ascended quickly in three eras

    THE DOWNSIDE OF ‘MARKETS IN EVERYTHING’

    The west ascended quickly in three eras by superiority in the combination of culture, technology, and warfare to create markets, and has been defeated in those three eras for the same reason: markets are an addition that are not limited to the consumption of accumulated genetic, normative, institutional, territorial capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 10:49:00 UTC

  • “How did a mad f–ker like you live this long?” “I’m good at killing people.” I

    “How did a mad f–ker like you live this long?”

    “I’m good at killing people.”

    I love trash talking in movies. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 20:10:00 UTC

  • (Interesting. reading through prisoner lists in the 1780’s just after ‘the stock

    (Interesting. reading through prisoner lists in the 1780’s just after ‘the stocks’ were eliminated, and going thru the list of crimes. Burglary, Burglary in the Daytime, Horse Stealing, Arson, Surprisingly common counterfeiting, Surprisingly little murder and rape; one count of bestiality – which carried a life sentence. )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 16:36:00 UTC

  • Natural languages do not have fixed grammatical rules– Yes they do. 1) Noun (na

    —Natural languages do not have fixed grammatical rules–

    Yes they do.

    1) Noun (name), Verb(change in state) Value judgement. (it is questionable whether value judgement is a verb or a loading )

    2) Referential recursion for Noun, Verb, and Phrase.

    3) High or low context with high or low precision.

    4) Operational grammar, ideal grammar (what you use), experiential grammar, or some conflation of them (ie: fictionalism, philosophy, theology).

    5) Analogy to subjective experience

    6) Subjective experience limited to range of possible human action.

    All languages demonstrate these properties. AFAIK all languages Must demonstrate these properties.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 13:26:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IS ENOUGH – EVERY ABLE MAN A SHERIFF You cannot win an argument with those

    TRUTH IS ENOUGH – EVERY ABLE MAN A SHERIFF

    You cannot win an argument with those who deny reality. Conservatives cannot win an argument while they cling to supernatural christianity. The only way to win is to abandon all lies, and use violence to create zero tolerance for lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 11:42:00 UTC

  • The only value in nn’s is in symbol detection, and from there on out, the cost r

    The only value in nn’s is in symbol detection, and from there on out, the cost reduction in the use of manifolds (geometry of relations) is so much cheaper, faster, more powerful, and controllable, and auditable that it will defeat training in every discipline that has any limitations on closure. So much like our brains, it is more logical to create hardware that produces a limited number of symbols, and then use software to synthesize them. Our brains do this at very low cost by making profound discounts to cost, relying on memory substitution rather than input retention. This is why we are able to act quickly in some circumstances, but why we have such high error rates in anything of any complexity. So AI will be beneficial above and below human scale, but not so much *at human scale* because nn’s can defeat us in perception, and GAI’s may defeat us at reason. But those two technologies NN/ML, and Algorithmic Artificial Intelligence will perform better than NN’s unless there is some tremendous innovation in hardware that allows it to compete with the 20w of power consumption of the human brain, or the 200 watts of an ordinary processor processing symbolic data (akin to language) fed to it by extraordinarily good measurements, provided by some variation of nn and Bayesian hardware.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 10:59:00 UTC