HARVARD WORST FOR FREE SPEECH? (obviously)
List of Uni’s by Free Speech
https://www.thefire.org/
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 20:18:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699517470179033146
Form: Short Note
-
HARVARD WORST FOR FREE SPEECH? (obviously) List of Uni’s by Free Speech
-
Joscha Bach (@Plinz) is the only other person I know of that understands the fun
Joscha Bach (@Plinz) is the only other person I know of that understands the fundamental problems of the shift in scientific epistemology. And despite my efforts at reduction into a universally commensurable language, he still manages to do a better job of getting the point… https://twitter.com/Plinz/status/1699395779327295532
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 19:40:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699507888278884610
-
Correct answer. Conspiracy to undermine the institutions of cultural production,
Correct answer.
Conspiracy to undermine the institutions of cultural production, our constitution and our laws.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 19:03:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699498546511159549
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699497919789859089
-
Postwar NYC is the product of the dollar. Nothing else. Weaken the central govt,
Postwar NYC is the product of the dollar. Nothing else. Weaken the central govt, weaken the dollar, end NYC and turn it into another of the many cities whose glory days of trade were behind them.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 19:01:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699498025775779873
Reply addressees: @VDAREJamesK @2020Blackstone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699488109602177312
-
Why do I feel like a moron for not knowing about Tweetdeck? This whole being an
Why do I feel like a moron for not knowing about Tweetdeck?
This whole being an autistic nerd thing has some advantages but feeling like an idiot once in a while is the price. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 18:43:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699493501283754414
Reply addressees: @Scobleizer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699492811366596778
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Scobleizer Sorry. You’re using tweetdeck. Apologies.
See? I said it was a stupid question. 😉Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1699492811366596778
-
body count, -intelligence, astrology, yoga, makeup, fingernails, fat, loud, aggr
body count, -intelligence, astrology, yoga, makeup, fingernails, fat, loud, aggressive, masculine.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 17:39:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699477546465743100
Reply addressees: @datepsych
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699461103128830313
-
We won’t miss you. Usage us up. Community networks developing. Features released
We won’t miss you. Usage us up. Community networks developing. Features released. It’s wonderful.
If you can’t build a community of common interest what does that say about you.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 01:39:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699235882664882645
Reply addressees: @McfcOrca @elonmusk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699231413864948015
-
Simple comparison of the three economic schools. 1. Austrian school behavioral s
Simple comparison of the three economic schools.
1. Austrian school behavioral science under natural law: Observer. Do nothing.
2. Chicago or freshwater school attempt at insurance against volatility: Insurer. Do no harm.
3. NY or saltwater school attempt at manipulation to maximize employment, consumption velocity and growth despite exacerbating cycles: Manager. Try to do good, even if it causes harm, and we’ll fix it later.Reply addressees: @gerardvongevers @skdh
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 00:36:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699220062480023553
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698953808192106497
-
All behavior is explicable (all behavior is rational response to incentives) for
All behavior is explicable (all behavior is rational response to incentives) for the actor in the moment. That does not mean it’s optimum over time. So the problem is we can never know enough information to predict behavior without interfering with the behavior. In other words we are informatinoally limited in both economics and physics. This means all science is fundamentally statistical not operational. Which is why ‘math’ has limits.
Reply addressees: @6_Figure_Invest @skdh
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 00:16:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699214929130065920
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699074161132655002
-
If you study physics, economics, and neuroscience – at least at the operational
If you study physics, economics, and neuroscience – at least at the operational rather than biochemical level, you will have a rather complete understanding of the spectrum of models that constitute our observable universe. Knowing the limits of mathematics, computation, simulation, and sets(language) doesn’t hurt either. Because at that point you know the four sciences: physical, behavioral, logical, and the logical outcome of the evolutionary: continuous recursive disambiguation at all scales by the conversion of entropy into stable relations we call persistence.
Reply addressees: @skdh @PavlosProkopeas
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 00:10:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699213545106223104
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698987982898774111