Form: Short Note

  • Gpu’s And Topological Data Structures

    Via Kashif Vikaas I suppose that its not common knowledge but we were doing this back in 2006, and if you’re going to store data in manifolds (topologies) of N-dimensions of relations, then you can used various pathing algorithms and even possibly N-dimensional visibility algorithms to search content far faster than any existing technology. This was our intention with Runcible’s technology. It was just too early and I realized that it was billion dollar research and development effort that I am not intellectually or emotionally of Financially or physically capable of managing without multiple nervous breakdowns. lol The problem at the time was storing data in each geometry but I think that’s teh difference between indexes and content, and that we should view geometric search engines as indexes of n-dimensional relations. If you have some vague understanding of what I’m saying here, this is why I understood that (a) actions, and (b) vitruvian semantics, grammar and syntax (metaphysics, and (c) Property in toto, provided computational commensurability in an unclosed data store. Why? Because for humans to understand anything it must be reduced to an analogy to experience, and as such human perception limits serve as a set of units of measure of all of reality.
  • AND TOPOLOGICAL DATA STRUCTURES Via @[605597:2048:Kashif Vikaas] I suppose that

    https://www2.wwt.com/all-blog/how-gpus-and-high-performance-computing-can-augment-big-data/GPU’S AND TOPOLOGICAL DATA STRUCTURES

    Via @[605597:2048:Kashif Vikaas]

    I suppose that its not common knowledge but we were doing this back in 2006, and if you’re going to store data in manifolds (topologies) of N-dimensions of relations, then you can used various pathing algorithms and even possibly N-dimensional visibility algorithms to search content far faster than any existing technology.

    This was our intention with Runcible’s technology.

    It was just too early and I realized that it was billion dollar research and development effort that I am not intellectually or emotionally of Financially or physically capable of managing without multiple nervous breakdowns. lol

    The problem at the time was storing data in each geometry but I think that’s teh difference between indexes and content, and that we should view geometric search engines as indexes of n-dimensional relations.

    If you have some vague understanding of what I’m saying here, this is why I understood that (a) actions, and (b) vitruvian semantics, grammar and syntax (metaphysics, and (c) Property in toto, provided computational commensurability in an unclosed data store.

    Why? Because for humans to understand anything it must be reduced to an analogy to experience, and as such human perception limits serve as a set of units of measure of all of reality.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:12:00 UTC

  • AND TOPOLOGICAL DATA STRUCTURES Via Kashif Vikaas I suppose that its not common

    https://www2.wwt.com/all-blog/how-gpus-and-high-performance-computing-can-augment-big-data/GPU’S AND TOPOLOGICAL DATA STRUCTURES

    Via Kashif Vikaas

    I suppose that its not common knowledge but we were doing this back in 2006, and if you’re going to store data in manifolds (topologies) of N-dimensions of relations, then you can used various pathing algorithms and even possibly N-dimensional visibility algorithms to search content far faster than any existing technology.

    This was our intention with Runcible’s technology.

    It was just too early and I realized that it was billion dollar research and development effort that I am not intellectually or emotionally of Financially or physically capable of managing without multiple nervous breakdowns. lol

    The problem at the time was storing data in each geometry but I think that’s teh difference between indexes and content, and that we should view geometric search engines as indexes of n-dimensional relations.

    If you have some vague understanding of what I’m saying here, this is why I understood that (a) actions, and (b) vitruvian semantics, grammar and syntax (metaphysics, and (c) Property in toto, provided computational commensurability in an unclosed data store.

    Why? Because for humans to understand anything it must be reduced to an analogy to experience, and as such human perception limits serve as a set of units of measure of all of reality.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:12:00 UTC

  • The Current State Of Knowledge

    Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind) Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition) Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective) Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders) Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here: http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ ) I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy. In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model.
  • CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahn

    http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/THE CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

    Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain)

    Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind)

    Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition)

    Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own

    William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization

    Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective)

    Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders)

    Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here:

    http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ )

    I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy.

    In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 08:51:00 UTC

  • The Current State Of Knowledge

    Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind) Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition) Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective) Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders) Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here: http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ ) I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy. In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model.
  • by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Percep

    by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Perception -> generalization-> conflation -> faked commensurability — My view is that we try to reinforce paradigmatic networks bcasue it’s cheaper.
  • by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Percep

    by Bill Joslin

    Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern.

    Perception -> generalization-> conflation -> faked commensurability



    My view is that we try to reinforce paradigmatic networks bcasue it’s cheaper.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 12:50:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Percep

    by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Perception -> generalization-> conflation -> faked commensurability — My view is that we try to reinforce paradigmatic networks bcasue it’s cheaper.
  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.