Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well f

    I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well for me. Either make an argument, say something accomodating, or shut up. The way to defeat Ridicule, Shaming, Gossip, and Rallying ( feminine argument) is to return the ridicule, repeat the material question, avoid all engagement outside of it, and exhaust the other parties, using the venue to promote your ideas. If in person, use violence. i use it, recommend it, and write about it. All online attacks are marketing opportunities. If you are marketing the truth then likability is irrelevant. if likability is relevant then one is not selling a marginally beneficial truth.

  • Try to avoid stupidity in my presence. It gives me headaches. Different cultures

    Try to avoid stupidity in my presence. It gives me headaches. Different cultures do rely on different methods of argument, semantic relations, and definitions of truth. West is uniquely empirical: externally correspondent. All others rely on some version of wisdom literature.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-20 04:16:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/932462620166238213

    Reply addressees: @AgoristRobot @HuffleRuff @Voltaire1778__8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/932091390221221889

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/932091390221221889

  • Try to avoid stupidity in my presence. It gives me headaches. Different cultures

    Try to avoid stupidity in my presence. It gives me headaches. Different cultures do rely on different methods of argument, semantic relations, and definitions of truth. West is uniquely empirical: externally correspondent. All others rely on some version of wisdom literature.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-19 19:52:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/932335912498982919

  • Try to avoid stupidity in my presence. It gives me headaches. (Different culture

    Try to avoid stupidity in my presence. It gives me headaches. (Different cultures do rely on different methods of argument, semantic relations, and definitions of truth. West is uniquely empirical. All others rely on some version of wisdom literature.) https://twitter.com/Darth_Nox5/status/932112049760485376

  • (stupid stuff) I don’t have time for games, but I fit a few hours in now and the

    (stupid stuff) I don’t have time for games, but I fit a few hours in now and then. Unfortunately, I still haven’t found anything to compete with skyrim(past)/dead island(present)/borderlands(future). Loot games keep my interest. Lots of dopamine. lolz

  • (stupid stuff) I don’t have time for games, but I fit a few hours in now and the

    (stupid stuff) I don’t have time for games, but I fit a few hours in now and then. Unfortunately, I still haven’t found anything to compete with skyrim(past)/dead island(present)/borderlands(future). Loot games keep my interest. Lots of dopamine. lolz

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-18 15:56:00 UTC

  • (stupid stuff) I don’t have time for games, but I fit a few hours in now and the

    (stupid stuff) I don’t have time for games, but I fit a few hours in now and then. Unfortunately, I still haven’t found anything to compete with skyrim(past)/dead island(present)/borderlands(future). Loot games keep my interest. Lots of dopamine. lolz

  • The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal gram

    The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal grammar’, into the three spectrums of experience, and the physical, ideal, and imaginary dimensions of the universe. I can reduce the physical dimensions to action, and the experiential to combinations of reward systems (prey drive/mate drive), and the imaginary to a combination thereof. That’s just going to take me a long time. Maybe a year at the minimum – unless I’m lucky. But as I’ve tried to argue over the past few weeks I don’t think I need to go to that level in order to make my case. So I guess I have to say that I’m ‘unstuck’ from the grammar problem. And starting yesterday I was able to continue the chapter on vocabulary of epistemology.

  • The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal gram

    The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal grammar’, into the three spectrums of experience, and the physical, ideal, and imaginary dimensions of the universe.

    I can reduce the physical dimensions to action, and the experiential to combinations of reward systems (prey drive/mate drive), and the imaginary to a combination thereof. That’s just going to take me a long time. Maybe a year at the minimum – unless I’m lucky.

    But as I’ve tried to argue over the past few weeks I don’t think I need to go to that level in order to make my case.

    So I guess I have to say that I’m ‘unstuck’ from the grammar problem. And starting yesterday I was able to continue the chapter on vocabulary of epistemology.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-18 15:45:00 UTC

  • The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal gram

    The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal grammar’, into the three spectrums of experience, and the physical, ideal, and imaginary dimensions of the universe. I can reduce the physical dimensions to action, and the experiential to combinations of reward systems (prey drive/mate drive), and the imaginary to a combination thereof. That’s just going to take me a long time. Maybe a year at the minimum – unless I’m lucky. But as I’ve tried to argue over the past few weeks I don’t think I need to go to that level in order to make my case. So I guess I have to say that I’m ‘unstuck’ from the grammar problem. And starting yesterday I was able to continue the chapter on vocabulary of epistemology.