SHUT IT DOWN.
Staff necessary services with the military.
Extend the shutdown for more than 90 days.
Coup complete.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-18 22:19:00 UTC
Form: Short Note
-
SHUT IT DOWN. Staff necessary services with the military. Extend the shutdown fo
-
1) Shutdown Government. 2) Use Military to Staff Publicly Necessary Services 3)
1) Shutdown Government. 2) Use Military to Staff Publicly Necessary Services 3) Keep the ‘shutdown’ running, 5) Draft Reformed Constitution, 6) Ask the military to takeover by Coup. 7) American Revolution Complete #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-18 12:12:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953963364216197120
-
What i look for in others, is explanations of incentives, and measurements of th
What i look for in others, is explanations of incentives, and measurements of thefts or reciprocity, which apply universally across all sentient beings. What people intuit, and I consider a primitivism, is measurement by intuition that varies between individuals, groups, classes, norms, traditions, and laws. This is the difference between primitive animal intuitions, primitive beliefs, primitive norms, traditions, laws – all of which are incommensurable, and the simple truth and falsehood that is ascertainable by imposition of costs or voluntary exchange producing reciprocal rewards. -
What i look for in others, is explanations of incentives, and measurements of th
What i look for in others, is explanations of incentives, and measurements of thefts or reciprocity, which apply universally across all sentient beings.
What people intuit, and I consider a primitivism, is measurement by intuition that varies between individuals, groups, classes, norms, traditions, and laws.
This is the difference between primitive animal intuitions, primitive beliefs, primitive norms, traditions, laws – all of which are incommensurable, and the simple truth and falsehood that is ascertainable by imposition of costs or voluntary exchange producing reciprocal rewards.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-18 07:00:00 UTC
-
My answer to At what level of lightness of skin can a person be called a white p
My answer to At what level of lightness of skin can a person be called a white person? https://www.quora.com/At-what-level-of-lightness-of-skin-can-a-person-be-called-a-white-person/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-17 20:15:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953722526559031297
-
My answer to Do animals experience racism?
My answer to Do animals experience racism? https://www.quora.com/Do-animals-experience-racism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=eaaaa2e2
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-17 18:52:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953701561833803778
-
My answer to Do animals experience racism?
My answer to Do animals experience racism? https://www.quora.com/Do-animals-experience-racism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-17 18:51:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953701332610928640
-
We Don’t All Have To Speak In Operational Language Any More Than We Need To Speak In Mathematics Or Legalese. But…. 
Lets just say that there are inflationary grammars that assist in conveying meaning at lower cost, and deflationary grammars. And that the challenge is not so much in forcing everyone to use deflationary grammars, is it is, to sue devlationary grammars to eliminate ignorance, error, fraud and deceit from our inflationary grammars. I don’t expect very many people to write in or speak in testimonial, operational, propertarian language because it would be like asking everyone to talk in legalese. The problem is that without deflationary grammars (like math and the other logics, or operationalism and propertarianism) it is very difficult to sanitize inflationary languages that are low cost, of the frauds and deceits that impose high costs on others via overloading. There is no excuse for lies. even comforting lies, if the fictionalism that is a mater of allegorical convenience, produces externalities that are destructive. -
WE DON’T ALL HAVE TO SPEAK IN OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE ANY MORE THAN WE NEED TO SPEA
WE DON’T ALL HAVE TO SPEAK IN OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE ANY MORE THAN WE NEED TO SPEAK IN MATHEMATICS OR LEGALESE. BUT….
Lets just say that there are inflationary grammars that assist in conveying meaning at lower cost, and deflationary grammars. And that the challenge is not so much in forcing everyone to use deflationary grammars, is it is, to sue devlationary grammars to eliminate ignorance, error, fraud and deceit from our inflationary grammars.
I don’t expect very many people to write in or speak in testimonial, operational, propertarian language because it would be like asking everyone to talk in legalese. The problem is that without deflationary grammars (like math and the other logics, or operationalism and propertarianism) it is very difficult to sanitize inflationary languages that are low cost, of the frauds and deceits that impose high costs on others via overloading.
There is no excuse for lies. even comforting lies, if the fictionalism that is a mater of allegorical convenience, produces externalities that are destructive.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-17 14:03:00 UTC
-
We Don’t All Have To Speak In Operational Language Any More Than We Need To Speak In Mathematics Or Legalese. But…. 
Lets just say that there are inflationary grammars that assist in conveying meaning at lower cost, and deflationary grammars. And that the challenge is not so much in forcing everyone to use deflationary grammars, is it is, to sue devlationary grammars to eliminate ignorance, error, fraud and deceit from our inflationary grammars. I don’t expect very many people to write in or speak in testimonial, operational, propertarian language because it would be like asking everyone to talk in legalese. The problem is that without deflationary grammars (like math and the other logics, or operationalism and propertarianism) it is very difficult to sanitize inflationary languages that are low cost, of the frauds and deceits that impose high costs on others via overloading. There is no excuse for lies. even comforting lies, if the fictionalism that is a mater of allegorical convenience, produces externalities that are destructive.