Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of

    We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of it is genetic, and how much learned. It’s probably like all else, more genetic than we wish to admit. We all intuit man as Between Rousseau’s and Hobbes’ vision. The evidence is ‘neither’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 16:32:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975409683656839168

    Reply addressees: @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975058733133778944

    IN REPLY TO:

    @sapinker

    I’m often compared to Peterson–Canadian psychologist, Harvard prof, P in-C, takes evolution seriously–but our styles and philosophies couldn’t be more different. We’ll explore them in a dialogue at some point soon.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975058733133778944

  • PETERSON EXPLAINED: is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self auth

    PETERSON EXPLAINED: is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self authoring) while also restoring mythology because of the correlation between our intuitions (biology) and archetypes (narratives). In this sense he is reforming religion from supernatural to scientific.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 16:29:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975408902283124736

    Reply addressees: @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975058733133778944

    IN REPLY TO:

    @sapinker

    I’m often compared to Peterson–Canadian psychologist, Harvard prof, P in-C, takes evolution seriously–but our styles and philosophies couldn’t be more different. We’ll explore them in a dialogue at some point soon.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975058733133778944

  • Much like Nietzsche said, if there is one man worth inventing time travel so tha

    Much like Nietzsche said, if there is one man worth inventing time travel so that we can kill, it’s him. He invented the industrialization of lying. Zoroastiranism > Abrahamism > (rabbinical judaism, christianity islam) > four great civilizations destroyed > the abrahamic dark ages > a brief restoration by western civilization (yet again), and then the second attempt at using abrahamic speech : Rousseau > Kant > Hegel > the Continentals > Then the third time with pseudoscience (Boaz, Marx, Freud,Cantor, Frankfurt > Postmodernism) Humans are extremely susceptible to certain forms of deception and Zoroaster began the greatest crime in history that resulted in more death, poverty, and ignorance.

  • Much like Nietzsche said, if there is one man worth inventing time travel so tha

    Much like Nietzsche said, if there is one man worth inventing time travel so that we can kill, it’s him. He invented the industrialization of lying.

    Zoroastiranism > Abrahamism > (rabbinical judaism, christianity islam) > four great civilizations destroyed > the abrahamic dark ages > a brief restoration by western civilization (yet again),

    and then the second attempt at using abrahamic speech : Rousseau > Kant > Hegel > the Continentals >

    Then the third time with pseudoscience (Boaz, Marx, Freud,Cantor, Frankfurt > Postmodernism)

    Humans are extremely susceptible to certain forms of deception and Zoroaster began the greatest crime in history that resulted in more death, poverty, and ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 15:39:00 UTC

  • Much like Nietzsche said, if there is one man worth inventing time travel so tha

    Much like Nietzsche said, if there is one man worth inventing time travel so that we can kill, it’s him. He invented the industrialization of lying. Zoroastiranism > Abrahamism > (rabbinical judaism, christianity islam) > four great civilizations destroyed > the abrahamic dark ages > a brief restoration by western civilization (yet again), and then the second attempt at using abrahamic speech : Rousseau > Kant > Hegel > the Continentals > Then the third time with pseudoscience (Boaz, Marx, Freud,Cantor, Frankfurt > Postmodernism) Humans are extremely susceptible to certain forms of deception and Zoroaster began the greatest crime in history that resulted in more death, poverty, and ignorance.

  • The Origin Of The Anglo Free Market Vs The Jewish Free Market.

    The free market was envisioned for the known purposes of (a) creating peaceful relations between then expanding empires, and (b) explaining why people treated each other well in ordinary commercial life vs inter-tribal life, (c) making use of comparative advantage between non-enemies. (d) reducing artificial shortages of food in particular that gave profits to large land holders at the cost of starving citizens. The free market ideology was a jewish invention, just as were the opposing forces of capitalism and communism. In the west it’s just simple reciprocity or not (unearned gains).

  • THE ORIGIN OF THE ANGLO FREE MARKET VS THE JEWISH FREE MARKET. The free market w

    THE ORIGIN OF THE ANGLO FREE MARKET VS THE JEWISH FREE MARKET.

    The free market was envisioned for the known purposes of (a) creating peaceful relations between then expanding empires, and (b) explaining why people treated each other well in ordinary commercial life vs inter-tribal life, (c) making use of comparative advantage between non-enemies. (d) reducing artificial shortages of food in particular that gave profits to large land holders at the cost of starving citizens.

    The free market ideology was a jewish invention, just as were the opposing forces of capitalism and communism.

    In the west it’s just simple reciprocity or not (unearned gains).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 12:43:00 UTC

  • The Origin Of The Anglo Free Market Vs The Jewish Free Market.

    The free market was envisioned for the known purposes of (a) creating peaceful relations between then expanding empires, and (b) explaining why people treated each other well in ordinary commercial life vs inter-tribal life, (c) making use of comparative advantage between non-enemies. (d) reducing artificial shortages of food in particular that gave profits to large land holders at the cost of starving citizens. The free market ideology was a jewish invention, just as were the opposing forces of capitalism and communism. In the west it’s just simple reciprocity or not (unearned gains).

  • Peterson Explained:

    He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self authoring) while also restoring mythology because of the correlation between our intuitions (biology) and archetypes (narratives). In this sense he is reforming religion from supernatural to scientific. We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of it is genetic, and how much learned. It’s probably like all else, more genetic than we wish to admit. We all intuit man as between Rousseau’s and Hobbes’ vision. The evidence is ‘neither’. Pinker intuits closer to rousseau and is optimistic, Peterson more towards Smith, and Pessimistic. These are assessments and intuitons not evidentiary truths. If we look at history, man is amoral: moral(reciprocal) immoral (irreciprocal) as suits him. We have just made it increasingly costly to prefer immorality (free riding, parasitism, predation) over morality (voluntary, fully informed, productive exchange). And as such vastly increased the time man devotes to moral activity, and the disproportionate returns on trade.

  • PETERSON EXPLAINED: He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self a

    PETERSON EXPLAINED:

    He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self authoring) while also restoring mythology because of the correlation between our intuitions (biology) and archetypes (narratives). In this sense he is reforming religion from supernatural to scientific.

    We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of it is genetic, and how much learned. It’s probably like all else, more genetic than we wish to admit. We all intuit man as between Rousseau’s and Hobbes’ vision. The evidence is ‘neither’.

    Pinker intuits closer to rousseau and is optimistic, Peterson more towards Smith, and Pessimistic. These are assessments and intuitons not evidentiary truths. If we look at history, man is amoral: moral(reciprocal) immoral (irreciprocal) as suits him.

    We have just made it increasingly costly to prefer immorality (free riding, parasitism, predation) over morality (voluntary, fully informed, productive exchange). And as such vastly increased the time man devotes to moral activity, and the disproportionate returns on trade.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 12:37:00 UTC