In any dispute between two testimonies regarding the same phenomenon, we have two tests of decidability: 1- Rationality (incentives) 2 – Parsimony (occam’s razor) If the incentive exist to fictionalize, and if fictionalism is defeated by parsimony, then the person is in fact lying. The only time to use a god is via positiva (poetic meaning and communication) but it cannot be used via negativa (truth or argument). The reason gods were necessary is intergenerational transfer. if gods were mortal they could not explain the long standing. A god is just a unit of measure of the intertemporal.
Form: Short Note
-
The Importance of The Grammars
I’ve been fussing over the grammars for a few weeks, and it’s occurred to me that this idea is as important as testimonialism, because it provides a means of comprehending the very great difference between reasoning and calculating. So, while I sort of treated it as ‘groundwork’ for testimonialism, I think I’m going to lift it up to it’s own subject under or epistemology. My intuition was to move it under Vitruvianism in metaphysics because it’s a system of measurement of sorts and the discussion naturally flows from one idea to the next. We’ll see.
-
The Importance of The Grammars
I’ve been fussing over the grammars for a few weeks, and it’s occurred to me that this idea is as important as testimonialism, because it provides a means of comprehending the very great difference between reasoning and calculating. So, while I sort of treated it as ‘groundwork’ for testimonialism, I think I’m going to lift it up to it’s own subject under or epistemology. My intuition was to move it under Vitruvianism in metaphysics because it’s a system of measurement of sorts and the discussion naturally flows from one idea to the next. We’ll see.
-
The purpose of stoicism(mindfulness) is to allow you distance from your impulses
The purpose of stoicism(mindfulness) is to allow you distance from your impulses so that you may train them rather than be goverened by the chaos of them.
The difference between buddhism and stoicism is action. Stoicism/dominance vs Buddhism/Submission.
Which people will argue with me, but the evidence is the evidence.
People need mindfulness to limit calculability (difficulty in in formation processing).
We can construct it by bad means (islamic submission), ok means (buddhist meditation), adequate means (homogenous kin groups and rituals), or exceptional means (stoic self authoring and incremental successes in competition in the real world).
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-12 19:42:00 UTC
-
THE DAMAGE OF CANTOR’S FRAME DEPENDS UPON WHICH PROBLEM YOU”RE TRYING TO SOLVE S
THE DAMAGE OF CANTOR’S FRAME DEPENDS UPON WHICH PROBLEM YOU”RE TRYING TO SOLVE
So cantor’s argument is regressive because it reversed the trend toward historizing math and merging math and science.
And it provided a generation with excuses to restore platonism. And it contributed to the misdirection of philosophy and logic in the 20th century just when we needed the opposite.
So, you know, I am criticizing the tendency of abrahamists to make similar methaphysical fictions and cause damage by externality.
So if you are only concerned with ‘meaning” then cantor’s fictionalism is a suppose a fairy tale that explains pairing-off (one to one correspondence) as a means of testing extremely large sets.
If you are concerned with truth, then cantor is a fictionalist, and is leading to the confusion of generations of minds.
If you are concerned with platonism and abrahamism as the primary means by which western civilization was destroyed in the ancient and modern worlds, then Cantor like Marx, Freud, Boaz, and Adorno is a half-liar undermining the very secret of western civilization: words are sacred, promise is sacred, and by creating moral hazards with language all the ‘liars’ contributed to the catastrophe of the present.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-12 18:55:00 UTC
-
puts the autistic/neurotic vs solipsistic/psychotic argument to play
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-imbalance-of-wealth-in-the-world-the-result-of-considering-neurosis-less-harmful-than-psychosis/answer/Thomas-West-64?share=1cd47e87&srid=u4QvThomas puts the autistic/neurotic vs solipsistic/psychotic argument to play.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-12 07:14:00 UTC
-
The justification for kings
The justification for kings.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 18:41:00 UTC
-
You know, I leave FB/Twitter/a whole collection of email accounts, and most of t
You know, I leave FB/Twitter/a whole collection of email accounts, and most of the other social media platforms open at all times while I work. And I pretty much work all day. So sometimes I just have to seize certain opportunities for the pure joy of trash talking.
One of the reasons I love salesmen and sales calls – especially in technology – is that salesmen, like sports men, love to talk sh–t. I absolutely love sh-t talking. It’s very creative and comedic male bonding. It’s wonderful.
So you know, I”m gonna counter-signal by sh–t talking now and then just for the sheer joy of it. And yes, I will troll morons every now and then for the same reason as everyone else does: recreational value. It’s cathartic.
I mean, you just try to have rational conversations with mouth-breathers, and it takes a lot of patience. And sometimes you just gotta get that release… lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 08:06:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 17:52:00 UTC
-
We have seen Baltimore and LA, but nothing will compare to empty ATM’s, Empty St
We have seen Baltimore and LA, but nothing will compare to empty ATM’s, Empty Stores, no EBT’s, and hordes of the unwashed in the streets terrorizing the middle classes, and laying waste to the upper middle and upper. #Trump If we have a civil war the disaster will make history.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 15:58:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994607592625319936