THE ACADEMY LIKE HOLLYWOOD PRODUCES WORSE WORK PRODUCTS THAN INDIVIDUAL CRAFTSMAN IN EITHER INDUSTRY
Um. helps to keep in mind that the academy provides funding for thought and obviously subsidizes bad thought. Whereas thought leadership in history did not come from the academy but from wealth sufficient for literacy and time for study. In other words, it is not clear that the academy produces better intellectual work products than individual craftsmen, any more than Hollywood produces better art products than individual craftsmen. And the evidence appears overwhelmingly the opposite: that the academy, entertainment industry, media, and democratic state, produce higher volumes of bad quality everything.
The left see a fixed pie when convenient and an endless pie when convenient, but they never seem to notice that it is demand for reciprocity and the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, and advocacy along short, medium, and long term time horizons that continuously produces an ever expanding pie.
photos_and_videos/your_posts/36033409_10156452319842264_4549895552300482560_o_10156452319837264.jpg THEY UN-BANNED ME!!!!
First time I’ve put in a rebuttal that they’ve accepted it. (They should have.)
WHOO HOO!!Ben FrayleThe Special-Ops team is on their way…..Jun 25, 2018 11:08amAaron Kahlandpost rebuttal?Jun 25, 2018 11:08amDavin EastleyDoolittle the UNZUCCABLE, haha. Welcome back!Jun 25, 2018 11:11amTeresa GarciaWoooow!Jun 25, 2018 11:13amTeresa GarciaI stopped even trying, you give me hopes! HahahaJun 25, 2018 11:14amJustus KilianI just got out of fb jail for āhate speechā, after quoting the leader of our third biggest party.Jun 25, 2018 11:19amStephen KlostermeierTHAT’S where you were? Glad you are back!Jun 25, 2018 11:39amAngus JamesonWhoa!Jun 25, 2018 11:51amKelly WilsonCan you post the bannable offense and the rebuttal?Jun 25, 2018 12:00pmAnne SummersWelcome back.Jun 25, 2018 12:12pmTom WattDid you go and mention “them” by name?Jun 25, 2018 12:47pmTom WattMy last ban was 30 days. For a 100 year old Getty Image!!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=boy+and+his+dog.+india+getty&client=ms-android-metropcs-us&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjDzfDNou_bAhVGtlMKHePnBA0Q_AUIESgB&biw=360&bih=520#imgrc=W04fBnW-R5B3ZM:Jun 25, 2018 12:49pmTom WattThey see nudity. I see human suffering and indifference.Jun 25, 2018 12:51pmAileen Elizabeth MolloyHow do you send them a rebuttal?Jun 25, 2018 2:31pmCurt Doolittledunno. it just asked. i answeredJun 25, 2018 3:22pmAnthony MigchelsFuck Faceberg, and I hope we’ll all be ultimately able to create a platform that actually facilitates exchange between men, instead of trying to control exchange.
But I guess this is better than nothing.Jun 25, 2018 3:26pmAngus JamesonThey now have a deal where when you get notified you can actually send a rebuttal.
They ignore it generally. Or at least, the bar is very high.
I have successfully rebutted a couple of things, but that was clear stupidity on their part. I had published a couple of my own blog posts on my own blog FB page that were marked as āspam.ā
I never get off on my personal wall, though. I have a hundred fat lady haters who report every post, so numbers game.
It stems from the āKetotard Choniclesā group I run.
Iām near the end of my 13th Zucking.Jun 25, 2018 3:36pmPaul TrippI literally didn’t know they did this.Jun 25, 2018 5:40pmAngus JamesonZuck is very unlikely to die old, or of natural causes.
Just one more thing Iād never lift a finger to stop.Jun 25, 2018 5:46pmAnthony MigchelsYou’re right about that. I hadn’t looked at it that way.Jun 25, 2018 5:49pmTHEY UN-BANNED ME!!!!
First time I’ve put in a rebuttal that they’ve accepted it. (They should have.)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36033409_10156452319842264_4549895552300482560_o_10156452319837264.jpg THEY UN-BANNED ME!!!!
First time I’ve put in a rebuttal that they’ve accepted it. (They should have.)
WHOO HOO!!Ben FrayleThe Special-Ops team is on their way…..Jun 25, 2018 11:08amAaron Kahlandpost rebuttal?Jun 25, 2018 11:08amDavin EastleyDoolittle the UNZUCCABLE, haha. Welcome back!Jun 25, 2018 11:11amTeresa GarciaWoooow!Jun 25, 2018 11:13amTeresa GarciaI stopped even trying, you give me hopes! HahahaJun 25, 2018 11:14amJustus KilianI just got out of fb jail for āhate speechā, after quoting the leader of our third biggest party.Jun 25, 2018 11:19amStephen KlostermeierTHAT’S where you were? Glad you are back!Jun 25, 2018 11:39amAngus JamesonWhoa!Jun 25, 2018 11:51amKelly WilsonCan you post the bannable offense and the rebuttal?Jun 25, 2018 12:00pmAnne SummersWelcome back.Jun 25, 2018 12:12pmTom WattDid you go and mention “them” by name?Jun 25, 2018 12:47pmTom WattMy last ban was 30 days. For a 100 year old Getty Image!!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=boy+and+his+dog.+india+getty&client=ms-android-metropcs-us&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjDzfDNou_bAhVGtlMKHePnBA0Q_AUIESgB&biw=360&bih=520#imgrc=W04fBnW-R5B3ZM:Jun 25, 2018 12:49pmTom WattThey see nudity. I see human suffering and indifference.Jun 25, 2018 12:51pmAileen Elizabeth MolloyHow do you send them a rebuttal?Jun 25, 2018 2:31pmCurt Doolittledunno. it just asked. i answeredJun 25, 2018 3:22pmAnthony MigchelsFuck Faceberg, and I hope we’ll all be ultimately able to create a platform that actually facilitates exchange between men, instead of trying to control exchange.
But I guess this is better than nothing.Jun 25, 2018 3:26pmAngus JamesonThey now have a deal where when you get notified you can actually send a rebuttal.
They ignore it generally. Or at least, the bar is very high.
I have successfully rebutted a couple of things, but that was clear stupidity on their part. I had published a couple of my own blog posts on my own blog FB page that were marked as āspam.ā
I never get off on my personal wall, though. I have a hundred fat lady haters who report every post, so numbers game.
It stems from the āKetotard Choniclesā group I run.
Iām near the end of my 13th Zucking.Jun 25, 2018 3:36pmPaul TrippI literally didn’t know they did this.Jun 25, 2018 5:40pmAngus JamesonZuck is very unlikely to die old, or of natural causes.
Just one more thing Iād never lift a finger to stop.Jun 25, 2018 5:46pmAnthony MigchelsYou’re right about that. I hadn’t looked at it that way.Jun 25, 2018 5:49pmTHEY UN-BANNED ME!!!!
First time I’ve put in a rebuttal that they’ve accepted it. (They should have.)
From the series:
math/logic > science > philosophy > religion
we can construct the series:
physical > mental > emotional,
and the series:
logic > description > fiction,
and the series:
associable > reasonable > calculable > computable.
and we can use them to calculate the series:
lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency
The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills;
The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and;
The strong of will want science, to put their will to work;
And those who are strongest will want Law:
Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will.
Because we want what our Agency demands.
There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well.
Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups.
When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.
There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well.
Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups.
When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.