Spent the past week writing about the (many) methods of white, grey, black, and deep black lying. Just short paragraphs with one or two examples. And it …. it makes you fking hate the left, and appreciate the directness of masculine male conversation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 23:56:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016833511276376064
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Spent the past week writing about the (many) methods of white, grey, black, and deep black lying. Just short paragraphs with one or two examples. And it …. it makes you fking hate the left, and appreciate the directness of masculine male conversation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 23:55:59 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 22:00:35 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 20:54:11 UTC
Spent the past week writing about the (many) methods of white, grey, black, and deep black lying. Just short paragraphs with one or two examples. And it …. it makes you fking hate the left, and appreciate the directness of masculine male conversation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 19:55:00 UTC
Muslim Conquest of Spain reaches max in 750. Martel begins the reversal in 732, but it takes until 1492. The Merovingians 450-800 could not resist islam. The carolingians 800-880 could not. The viking age begins in 800-1066. The Hanseatic League begins in 1130 and starts to decline after 1450 with the rise of Atlantic Trade. What we see is clockwise attempts to concentrate power along the trade routes from italy, to spain, to france (really the germanic peoples) to the north sea peoples, to the center of germany. while at ehe same time the overland route through Lotharingia (dense europe today) from Venice to Brussels developed better than the periphery. Old europe (slavic europe today) resisted the muslims and ottomans but only barely. teh combination of the restoration of greek reason, printing, and the wealth of atlantic trade eliminated trade dependence through the middle east. and the west brought about the agrarian, then industrial and scientific revolutions. The basic problem is christianity was a capital sink (the church was a fucking horribly corrupt and damaging institutions, freezing half of europe’s capital). The point is that the church destroyed the martial order of europe quite intentionally (by design) and that it took the viking restoration to both create the crusades and the opportunity for the hansa (germanic civilization) to develop. You see this most clearly in the battles of henry the 5th where french knights had become such supernaturalists (believing they had god with them) that they were slaughtered like chickens en mass. You still see the protestant catholic line (Hajnal line). Islam reached it’s point of exhaustion. But it took until 1492 to get them out in the west, and 1683, and was really only reversed in 1992. We have only been free of islam for a few centuries, during which we prospered. We have only been free of the curse of christianity for about the same years. During which we prospered extraordinarily.
Muslim Conquest of Spain reaches max in 750. Martel begins the reversal in 732, but it takes until 1492. The Merovingians 450-800 could not resist islam. The carolingians 800-880 could not. The viking age begins in 800-1066. The Hanseatic League begins in 1130 and starts to decline after 1450 with the rise of Atlantic Trade. What we see is clockwise attempts to concentrate power along the trade routes from italy, to spain, to france (really the germanic peoples) to the north sea peoples, to the center of germany. while at ehe same time the overland route through Lotharingia (dense europe today) from Venice to Brussels developed better than the periphery. Old europe (slavic europe today) resisted the muslims and ottomans but only barely. teh combination of the restoration of greek reason, printing, and the wealth of atlantic trade eliminated trade dependence through the middle east. and the west brought about the agrarian, then industrial and scientific revolutions. The basic problem is christianity was a capital sink (the church was a fucking horribly corrupt and damaging institutions, freezing half of europe’s capital). The point is that the church destroyed the martial order of europe quite intentionally (by design) and that it took the viking restoration to both create the crusades and the opportunity for the hansa (germanic civilization) to develop. You see this most clearly in the battles of henry the 5th where french knights had become such supernaturalists (believing they had god with them) that they were slaughtered like chickens en mass. You still see the protestant catholic line (Hajnal line). Islam reached it’s point of exhaustion. But it took until 1492 to get them out in the west, and 1683, and was really only reversed in 1992. We have only been free of islam for a few centuries, during which we prospered. We have only been free of the curse of christianity for about the same years. During which we prospered extraordinarily.
I don’t have antipathy toward interest. I have an antipathy toward rents. And if we are borrowing from the treasury and paying interest that’s just rents. Banks, in the era of fiat money function only as insurers of borrowing from the treasury, with interest as fee for insuring one another’s borrowings from the treasury. But since in practice there is nearly zero risk and liability, that interest is not earned. Ergo if we are converting capital from future to present there is no CHOICE of investment wherein the private holder of an asset is paying an opportunity cost.
I don’t have antipathy toward interest. I have an antipathy toward rents. And if we are borrowing from the treasury and paying interest that’s just rents. Banks, in the era of fiat money function only as insurers of borrowing from the treasury, with interest as fee for insuring one another’s borrowings from the treasury. But since in practice there is nearly zero risk and liability, that interest is not earned. Ergo if we are converting capital from future to present there is no CHOICE of investment wherein the private holder of an asset is paying an opportunity cost.
“Pagans(scandinavians)”, Protestants(northern europeans), catholics (central, southern, and eastern europeans), and orthodox(eastern europeans) have different traditional (ancestral) cohesions to draw upon. We cannot intuit across traditions without living them and trying hard to adopt each. I am working to eliminate all falsehood. My bias is to eliminate falsehood. The way I learn to eliminate falsehood is by deflation: I attack all falsehoods without exception until i understand the problem such that only the underlying truths remain. I never make excuses for convenient falsehoods. I understand that goods come from falsehoods, but that betters come from truths. I try to discover those truths and construct the ‘goods and betters’ without the falsehoods. Some people can tolerate this degree of dispassionate slaughtering sacred cows, and some cant. Orthodox peoples have not had scandinavian, germanic, or catholic histories – although the history they do have is closest to the germanic(martial), and culturally closer to the catholic(lower trust) than to the scandinavian (including english), and german (highest trust). Commensurability and compatibility exists across truths but not across falsehoods. So while I can understand you, with some effort, you cannot understand me without much more effort.