In ukraine they celebrate the pagan, catholic, and orthodox holidays.
Really. My favorite is when the girls make little boats with candles and launch them down the river.
I fkkkking love Ukraine. lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 16:55:00 UTC
In ukraine they celebrate the pagan, catholic, and orthodox holidays.
Really. My favorite is when the girls make little boats with candles and launch them down the river.
I fkkkking love Ukraine. lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 16:55:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40136559_287282945201936_4284734364618588160_o_287282938535270.jpg THE CHURCH IS DEAD. AND WILL BE EXTINCT WITHIN A GENERATION.
USA
20% of people attend church regularly.
Nearly all of them are old or underclass.
UK
1.7% of people attend church regularly.THE CHURCH IS DEAD. AND WILL BE EXTINCT WITHIN A GENERATION.
USA
20% of people attend church regularly.
Nearly all of them are old or underclass.
UK
1.7% of people attend church regularly.

Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 16:42:00 UTC
THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM
Jews have, more successfully than all other people, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction transferred… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287207388542825&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:42:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033741427673579520
We are at war. A very nearly hot, civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts between despots. Because only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at least ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
We are at war. A very nearly hot, civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts between despots. Because only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at least ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science) –Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science) –Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—
( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.