photos_and_videos/GODEMPERORTRUMPMemes_ZDQbXBwGnA/42495013_297489934181237_779655247055290368_o_297489930847904.jpg
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-25 13:01:00 UTC
Form: Short Note
-
ALL: CURT BLOCKED FOR POST ON FEMININE MIND REGARDLESS OF PHYSICAL GENDER Reques
ALL: CURT BLOCKED FOR POST ON FEMININE MIND REGARDLESS OF PHYSICAL GENDER
Requested Review. This is the kind of thing that demonstrates the tolerance for anti white male speech but intolerance for any defense.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-25 12:57:00 UTC
-
“I’d say what is actually being proven is that a man’s testimony is worth only a
–“I’d say what is actually being proven is that a man’s testimony is worth only a fraction of a woman’s in the United States, as her allegations without consistent evidence are still being valued over his innocence.”— Steven Kolpek
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-25 07:46:00 UTC
-
September 25th, 2018 9:42 AM [W]omen are wonderful, and superior at the same thi
September 25th, 2018 9:42 AM [W]omen are wonderful, and superior at the same things men are not. The problem was extending the franchise without producing a market for differences between the genders in the production of commons. We created houses for the aristocracy(monarchy), nobility(lords), middle class (commons). But when we added labor (labor), and then added women(women), we did not add houses for them, and thereby failed to grasp what we had done: created a market for the production of commons between the classes that prohibited the abuse by any in gaining majority. The problem was, that people become increasingly incompetent in matters of the day as their responsibilities decline. So without requirements for children and property it is almost impossible to create a civil discourse and market between the classes – since the people in the market for commons must demonstrate prior ability to succeed in markets of voluntary cooperation.
-
Untitled
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001622https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001622
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 22:43:00 UTC
-
All surviving other than semitic( jewish and muslim) appear to be k-based. Paret
All surviving other than semitic( jewish and muslim) appear to be k-based. Pareto distributions are a function of the difficulty in organizing a polity. IQ and industriousness improve the quality of the polity. Aside from that I’m not sure I understand the question as yet…. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 21:34:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043976901226901515
Reply addressees: @brantleynow
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043826247191719937
IN REPLY TO:
@brantleynow
@curtdoolittle are there examples of substantially K-biased populations? or is this distribution roughly 50/50 with high industriousness and IQ being the rarity that accounts for Pareto distributions?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043826247191719937
-
You are gonna love this constitution. Just…. love it. No more powerlessness in
You are gonna love this constitution. Just…. love it. No more powerlessness in the face of procedural and political failure.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 18:33:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043931305883439104
-
You are gonna love this constitution. Just…. love it. No more powerlessness in
You are gonna love this constitution. Just…. love it. No more powerlessness in the face of procedural and political failure.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 14:33:00 UTC
-
CHINA AND RUSSIA Their position is very much like mine: that the cancers of the
CHINA AND RUSSIA
Their position is very much like mine: that the cancers of the west’s hedonism not spread to their societies. In that sense I envy those countries. The fact that they would, if possible, not only defend themselves from (((western))) decline, but violate every possible bit of reciprocity and return the world to it’s pre-law order, is something else.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 11:58:00 UTC
-
China And Russia
September 23rd, 2018 11:58 AM CHINA AND RUSSIA Their position is very much like mine: that the cancers of the west’s hedonism not spread to their societies. In that sense I envy those countries. The fact that they would, if possible, not only defend themselves from (((western))) decline, but violate every possible bit of reciprocity and return the world to it’s pre-law order, is something else.