Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • (Apologies if I’m heavy handed at the moment. We have attracted a large rotation

    (Apologies if I’m heavy handed at the moment. We have attracted a large rotation of newbs and with them the usual set of proletarian trolls, for whom sh-tposting is habituated form of self-image-defense. I can’t always match name to phrase and tell the difference between humor and trolling. So if I stomp on humor pls understand i’m just “Curating the Feed With Speed”, and don’t always ‘get’ your frame of mind or intent. English is a low-context, high precision language, so please depend a bit less on assuming I (we) grasp your context. It’s not as obvious as you assume. -cheers )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 12:44:00 UTC

  • It takes a great deal of accumulated skill (or experience with life, law, econom

    It takes a great deal of accumulated skill (or experience with life, law, economics and software) to make propertarian arguments. It’s a discipline. It’s non trivial. But, they are POST-MORAL arguments. That’s the thing. They are no longer normative. They consist of MEASUREMENTS not VALUES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 11:53:00 UTC

  • wth is it with wingsuit guys? nope. that’s a lotta nope

    wth is it with wingsuit guys? nope. that’s a lotta nope.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 23:22:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053788666471071745

  • wth is it with wingsuit guys? nope. that’s a lotta nope

    wth is it with wingsuit guys? nope. that’s a lotta nope.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 19:22:00 UTC

  • Left Archetype Is Simple Really – Like the Herd

    October 20th, 2018 12:29 PM LEFT ARCHETYPE IS SIMPLE REALLY – LIKE THE HERD

    —“I wish I could think of an archetype or character in a classic tale of the useful idiot, then I could better describe the left.”–@SPQRIUS

    I have worked on this. The Archetype for the left is a combination of (a) The Innocent (child) in the spectrum between (b) The Jester (hedonist) and (c) The Saint (Mother). Just as left specializes in harm/care/proportionality moral bias, they specialize in those Archetypes that explain that bias: Those that Lack of Agency. Innocent (lacks agency)Hedonist (lack agency)Mother (lacks agency over other than her children)

  • Left Archetype Is Simple Really – Like the Herd

    October 20th, 2018 12:29 PM LEFT ARCHETYPE IS SIMPLE REALLY – LIKE THE HERD

    —“I wish I could think of an archetype or character in a classic tale of the useful idiot, then I could better describe the left.”–@SPQRIUS

    I have worked on this. The Archetype for the left is a combination of (a) The Innocent (child) in the spectrum between (b) The Jester (hedonist) and (c) The Saint (Mother). Just as left specializes in harm/care/proportionality moral bias, they specialize in those Archetypes that explain that bias: Those that Lack of Agency. Innocent (lacks agency)Hedonist (lack agency)Mother (lacks agency over other than her children)

  • The Virtue Spiral of Left Falsehood Into Psychosis

    October 20th, 2018 11:55 AM THE VIRTUE SPIRAL OF LEFT FALSEHOOD INTO PSYCHOSIS

    —“The Left seems to utter so divorced from reality that they just can react effectively at all. I mean, look at Elizabeth Warren!”—Daniel Roland Anderson

    Combining: (a)The Parable of 17 Lies, and (b) bias to double down on malinvestments, (c) Female/herd need to maintain consensus and peace at all costs. For every lie they must tell 17 more to cover it, and 17 for each of those, etc. For every falsification of those lies they must double down with greater lies. This combination of maintaining the collective narrative( Frame/ Dogma), increasing the number of lies, and creating ever-greater lies, eventually leads to a cognitive FRAME that is discontiguous with reality. The left is literally so divorced from reality it is collectively psychotic.

  • The Virtue Spiral of Left Falsehood Into Psychosis

    October 20th, 2018 11:55 AM THE VIRTUE SPIRAL OF LEFT FALSEHOOD INTO PSYCHOSIS

    —“The Left seems to utter so divorced from reality that they just can react effectively at all. I mean, look at Elizabeth Warren!”—Daniel Roland Anderson

    Combining: (a)The Parable of 17 Lies, and (b) bias to double down on malinvestments, (c) Female/herd need to maintain consensus and peace at all costs. For every lie they must tell 17 more to cover it, and 17 for each of those, etc. For every falsification of those lies they must double down with greater lies. This combination of maintaining the collective narrative( Frame/ Dogma), increasing the number of lies, and creating ever-greater lies, eventually leads to a cognitive FRAME that is discontiguous with reality. The left is literally so divorced from reality it is collectively psychotic.

  • More on The Fraud of Tolerance and The Payment of Forbearance

    October 20th, 2018 11:49 AM MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE

    —“The centre holds onto tolerance because tolerance is passive. Those lacking agency can participate in tolerance while ignoring limits, because they don’t have the agency to enforce limits, and by ignoring limits they can stay in denial of their lack of agency. Forbearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” —- @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]

    “FORBEARANCE”

    —-“I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It is a passive state. No agency. …. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows agency.”— @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]

    CD: This is great line of original thinking. I don’t know where it’s coming from but it’s an example of how we are all increasing precision and measurement. (thanks to Brandon Hayes for looping me in)

  • Masculinity – The Book Collection For Gentlemen.

    October 20th, 2018 11:21 AM ONE OF MY ALBUMS: A COLLECTION I KEPT AT MY HOUSE. SECRET: Almost everything you read on manliness will teach you to be an officer and a gentleman in civilian clothes. That’s all it is. We tend to create soldiers of the state today, who are participants in the administration of combined arms. In that sense we produce few Officers and Gentlemen. We have lost our intergenerational military aristocracy as the principle origin of our political representatives. So it is increasingly difficult to imitate an aristocrat. One can still learn how to be a warrior. It is increasingly difficult to learn to be an aristocrat. For that reason we can and must restore the skill base deliberately. Um. It sells. Aristocrat Sells, Athlete sells, Musician sells, Money Sells. Sell women less (they consume) and sell men more (produce together).