You can learn the three fundamental models of project management, basic accounting, basic contract law, and micro economics (incentives), in a single course in about a year, and be good at all of those in two. If you can write a contract, run a project, manage the finances, and understand incentives of everyone involved you know the plumbing of the entire world system. Everything else is the craft you employ under that model, and your dress, manners, diction, vocabulary, hygiene, and how much of an ass you are (or not). It’s not difficult to be competent.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45105824_10156746943187264_2041181012695711744_o_10156746943182264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45082954_10156746944947264_1269175729459822592_o_10156746944927264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45013078_10156746944932264_3806823488052789248_n_10156746944922264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45103412_10156746944957264_4224756666748370944_n_10156746944937264.jpg WERE THE SUMERIANS WHITE? (NO)
RACIAL CATEGORIES OF WEST EURASIANS
I’ve covered this elsewhere in detail, but here, i’ll repeat:
While even Aristotle used Racial Categories, (and was clearly a supremacist by every measure, and identified the same behaviors we do today due to geographic causes).
It wasn’t until the western use of sail to cover the globe that we were able to observe and understand that all groups on the globe evolved on different continents and under different conditions and that all people could be categorized into three or four groups with common features and customs. (African, west asian, east asian, and the early people along the coastal route from africa to india, through the pacific into australia.)
WHITE DIFFERENTIATION FROM OTHER GROUPS
White (European, Western, Christendom) practices a unique combination of cultural traits, as well as two genetic traits.
Cultural:
(i) speaking the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, regardless of the impact on the status, dominance, and competence hierarchies that we inherited from the Yamna/Corded Ware, and Indo European Expansion (Paganism).
This is in direct opposition to ‘Face’ practiced by all other cultures, and direct opposition to ‘postmodern political correctness’ and their attempt to restore the primitivism of ‘face’.
(ii) the development of the ‘corporation’ or ‘commons’ that broke family barriers under bipartite manorialism, (high trust),
(iii) the four principles of christianity also invented to break kinship bonds:
iii.1 The eradication of hatred from the human heart.
iii.2 The extension of kinship love to non-kin.
iii.3 The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
iii.4 The demand for personal charity until personally certain it didn’t work.
Genetic:
(i) greater neoteny than all but east asians but different dimorphic distribution of traits.
(ii) a balance between both linguistic and spatial intelligence
(iii) the additional successful reduction of the lower and underclasses and a downward expansion of the genetic middle classes, under (most recently) bipartite manorialism, but (apparently) back into prehistory as well.
(iv) the additional successful reduction of the lower classes by aggressive hanging of scolds, malcontents, indolent, and criminals for over a thousand years (maybe as much as one half percent per year),
(v) further culling of the impulsive during long winters, starvation, warfare, disease – despite better living standards under manorialism than the rest of the world – such that by 1200 europeans were already ahead in caloric consumption and military development than the middle east.
THE MEANING OF ‘WHITE’
We use ‘white’ today simply because ‘christendom’ and ‘european’, and ‘western’ have been intentionally undermined by the pseudoscientific postwar movement using marx(economics), boas(sociology), freud(psychology), the frankfurt school (culture), and the (literary sophism) of the french postmodernists (outright denialism), in order to prevent the continuation of the scientific revolution into the social sciences, which was started by Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Poincare, Spencer, Nietzsche, and the Romanticists
.
So, white refers to the set of european ethnicities (Genetic Groups) consisting of Old Europe (Greeco-Byzantine Civilization, the boot of italy, sicily, and sardinia), The Southern Europeans, The Atlantics, Germanics/scandinavians, Slavs, Finnics.
They consists of those people of the western indo european expansion of the Yamna ( Pit Grave, Militaristic, Technological, Paternalistic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, that gave us the uniqueness of western civilization, in combination with horse, bronze, and wheel.).
WHITE is the identity of atlantic, germanic, scandinavian, finnic, slavic peoples, and for historical reasons we include Old Europeans even though they are of anatolian extraction, not european – hence the complexion, build, and hair. These are the people of the westward expansion of the indo europeans (Yamna, corded ware cultures). (and yes, they largely replaced (exterminated) those that they conquered.
However, ‘Whites’ are just the westernmost branches of west eurasians.
We broadly group these people into the category ‘caucasian’, which might be better said either ‘peoples of the black sea’, or ‘people of the black sea that evolved during the ice age.
October 31st, 2018 5:56 PM
[T]his is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic.
While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency.
So when I started out and said:
1) we are going to have a revolution
2) nothing can stop it.
3) all we can do is control it.
4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan
5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incentives that the majority of the population will not RESIST.
6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards.
7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution.
8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist.
I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future.
Cheers
