Form: Short Note

  • Religion was the hardest problem in social science.

    (FB 1541426321 Timestamp) I told ya. Religion was the hardest problem in social science. The rest was trivial by comparison. But once you understand religion as a science, you are no longer bound by the limits of your experience.

  • Religion was the hardest problem in social science.

    (FB 1541426321 Timestamp) I told ya. Religion was the hardest problem in social science. The rest was trivial by comparison. But once you understand religion as a science, you are no longer bound by the limits of your experience.

  • James on “honor (gloating) in Deceit”

    [R]egarding “honor-in-deceit”, let’s tease this out because it is beyond that. If you remember Japanese, say during WWII, only cowards surrender. I true warrior would rather die in battle or by suicide (not agreeing with that, just observing). So here we have not just “honor-in-deceit” but “mocking, and gloating”, so that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon. Then if you simply close the doors and say never again they come back, please please or you are racist! to let them in. Then you will get punked again and they laugh and mock you. Let’s Repeat That:

    —“It’s not just honor-in-deceit, but a mocking, and gloating, that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon.”—

    They POISON the MORAL WELL, and leave only the option for physical retaliation. Which is precisely what HONOR REQUIRES (duty, cost of maintaining the commons). If we argue and disagree we can separate. If we argue and insult we must punish. That is the only way to preserve the moral and informational commons.

  • Their Method of Argument…

    [I] have (((Their))) Method of Argument down in form. James has it down in stages of argument and counter-argument. We just need to educate everyone on it. Then we need to educate everyone that the only reason to NOT engage in ‘warfare’ and instead in debate, is if we are actually debating in order to determine a trade when we don’t agree, or a good, when we do. Then we need to engage in ‘War’ often enough that we suppress the ‘poisoning of the well’.

  • The Left “debate” Strategy Isn’t to Debate

    [D]uplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy. The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits. Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique. Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”. The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency. It’s that simple.

  • Their Method of Argument…

    [I] have (((Their))) Method of Argument down in form. James has it down in stages of argument and counter-argument. We just need to educate everyone on it. Then we need to educate everyone that the only reason to NOT engage in ‘warfare’ and instead in debate, is if we are actually debating in order to determine a trade when we don’t agree, or a good, when we do. Then we need to engage in ‘War’ often enough that we suppress the ‘poisoning of the well’.

  • The Left “debate” Strategy Isn’t to Debate

    [D]uplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy. The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits. Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique. Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”. The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency. It’s that simple.

  • ( Ok. So findings come out and Ford is the quick and easy chick at parties and n

    ( Ok. So findings come out and Ford is the quick and easy chick at parties and nobody buys Kavanaugh did anything. ie: media circus all made it all up. Typical left nonsense. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 17:47:00 UTC

  • 2018-11-04

    https://t.co/aiKoSyLkqP


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 14:50:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059095510475268096

  • Us? We are disgusted by animals, parasitism and dysgenia in the commons. I don’t

    Us? We are disgusted by animals, parasitism and dysgenia in the commons. I don’t, we don’t fear anyone. Me and mine? We’re “The Ones Who Knock”. And if you weren’t afraid of that fact then you wouldn’t live in terror of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 14:30:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059090588472090624

    Reply addressees: @LibrarianVee @_Kevin_Pham

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059083097390624768


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LibrarianVee

    @_Kevin_Pham @curtdoolittle Fear and dislike of people you —well— don’t like

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059083097390624768