Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 20:51:00 UTC

  • SIMPLE VERSION The problem of trust in a heterogeneous people is both gender, fa

    SIMPLE VERSION

    The problem of trust in a heterogeneous people is both gender, family, tribe, class, and race. In a homogeneous people it is just gender, family, and class. Marriage market solves gender conflict, and commercial market solves familial market, and houses of government solve class markets for commons. So the problem is scale of middle class, and limiting competition in political markets.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 13:09:00 UTC

  • We are just itching for an excuse to make Paris’ Riots look like the tantrum of

    We are just itching for an excuse to make Paris’ Riots look like the tantrum of schoolgirls. You will come to the conclusion that you need only say the word – and will need to – and we will clean the swamps such that they speak of it 10,000 years. #POTUS #realDonaldTrump #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 19:14:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071845445293494273

  • Untitled

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=idogEoV4yKo&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DIQsI4M4KtQQ%26feature%3Dshare

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 17:55:00 UTC

  • THE NARRATIVES WE BUILD It is very difficult to both think very deeply about the

    THE NARRATIVES WE BUILD

    It is very difficult to both think very deeply about the the universe, the world, life, and experience, and not produce an internal story of wonder. That is why all of us that think deeply about the universe, the world, life, and experience do so.

    That is, in no small part, because the alternative is too upsetting to survive with. Some of us see a vast, cold, dead, hostile, uncaring universe. Some of us wonder at its complexities. Some of us, but new worlds to conquer. Some of us all of the above.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 17:17:00 UTC

  • however, mathematics is axiomatic and physics is theoretic. so math is therefore

    however, mathematics is axiomatic and physics is theoretic. so math is therefore a logic, and physics therefore a science. cant have it both ways…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 14:45:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071777806168797184

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071677548914970624

    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle Math is the most “pure” among them (there is a good joke about “purity” in science), but I was thinking more to meta-physics, as a way to understand the Universe (clarity of the tools used to understand Reality). “Experimentum solum certificat in talibus” as Albertus Magnus said. https://t.co/DXxFVZIK4V

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071677548914970624

  • Let me help you. In the ancient and medieval world, you were EITHER trained in t

    Let me help you. In the ancient and medieval world, you were EITHER trained in the church OR trained in traditional law and warfare.

    In that model separation of church and state survives.

    When we ended aristocracy we made it possible for people of a church, including the marxist-postmodernist-feminist church, to be raised in the church (the MPF academy) without learning and demonstrating fitness in war.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 13:55:00 UTC

  • GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY by Bill Joslin As far as I can tell – testosterone in men in

    GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY

    by Bill Joslin

    As far as I can tell – testosterone in men increases in-group loyalty and bonding (ingroup preference) but not out-group hostility. Oxytocin in women increases out-group hostility.

    This makes sense. Women in charge of young (reduced mobility and defense) by being outgroup sensitive would afford “proximity” sensing for a group (enemies are at the gates).

    Men who must then defend, do so cooperatively and this ingroup loyalty would have men fight to protect each other (opposed to fighting to kill an enemy or flee and abandon brothers).

    The two together: female-low resolution high sensitivity may not provide much detail in assessing the quality of a threat (those strangers might not be hostile, they might be, but might not be) – where as men, driven by loyalty will approach and assess the threat (they are not necessarily out-group hostile) and if it is a threat will not flee, but rather stand and defend.

    So we have a binary, at a distance, early warning (female) coupled with a spectrum, approach and assess defense (male).

    Our current migrant sentiment might be best seen as a female out-group hostility turned in on the ingroup (toward their own males due to feminist political power seeking) coupled with or playing off males low outgroup hostility and high loyalty (to their woman).

    We might harp on the girls in Curt’s circles – but it is the gals through mate selection who drive changes in males (hypergamy creates male hierarchy and selects for robustness and agression or the inverse as laid-out above).

    Girls maketh the man.

    It’s then males that provide a counter-balance.

    Women drive changes, men constrain the tails.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 13:42:00 UTC

  • Marxism started just like we have. We are online. They were in cafes writing pam

    Marxism started just like we have. We are online. They were in cafes writing pamphlets. We are in the states, canada, australia, and europe. They were in france, germany, spain, italy, and russia.

    It’s just a few men scribbling back and forth until they create an intellectual product of sufficient political utility that they satisfy the era’s demand for a solution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 10:45:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 09:39:00 UTC