Um. I teach intolerance for sophism, idealism, pseudoscience and supernaturalism, and radical intolerance for GSRM, pilpul, critique. Why would you expect me to be tolerant of those forms of argument. I mean, of course I come of as intolerant and prosecutorial – it’s my fking JOB. lol… damn….
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-08 21:08:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51670530_10156973520687264_6612047966884593664_n_10156973520682264.jpg
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-08 20:34:00 UTC
I love talking to ukrainians. And I just noticed how I change my conversational method to ‘reasonableness’ from ‘judgement’ when talking to them. And I think that’s what I like so much about living there. The general approach to one another is ‘be reasonable’. Where as the general approach to one another is ‘be right, just, moral’ – judgemental.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-08 11:50:00 UTC
Yes, the reason I answer relationship questions is because (a) propertarianism is superpower when discussing psychology, and (b) the answer is always “tell the truth”. Most of the time either men or women know the truth but need confidence to say it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-08 10:55:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 23:24:00 UTC
LETS UNDERSTAND: JOHN MARK IS SUCCESSFUL
He’s meteorically successful. And that’s good and bad. I would like to have meteoric success after the institute had graduated a few courses, and the book was published, so that it was much harder to ‘make shit up’ rather than defend the work.
So, this meteoric rise increases our reach at the expense of the burden of those on the right who have failed for years. Our success illustrates their failure.
These members of the failed-right are envious of John’s success and are using his success as a coattail to ride on. By attacking our work (and me) they can generate interest from the tinfoil hat and zig-heil crowds. And so it’s expected.
Now, my strategy with the libertine-libertarians, was to understand, and then destroy the movement as best I could – which at this point is pretty much the ‘lol-bertarians’.
The failed-right needs the same treatment as the failed-libertarians. The winning right is not destined for the limited demographic of keyboard meme-warriors seeking ideology, nor those seeking paternal authority to save them, nor those seeking religion to save them. Those without agency cannot be saved – they can only stay out of the way.
So my strategy is to pivot.
Because the conservative mainstream is vast. And they care about policy, because they have agency, because they have skin in the game.
And the failed-right is death sentence for anything touching it.
The purpose of any movement is to obtain power. And to obtain power one needs something that can sell. And not to the fringe, but to the mainstream. Once one has power, then the future consists of a field of choices.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 21:16:00 UTC
(ok, this holiday season was … undisciplined. you can legitimately criticize my BMI until I drop ten pounds. lol)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 00:01:00 UTC
[I] hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment. I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment. I (WE) BLOCK FOR: 1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of: 2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument. 3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone) 4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument 5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument. 6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument. 7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.) 8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems. I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless. NOTE: I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.
[I] hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment. I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment. I (WE) BLOCK FOR: 1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of: 2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument. 3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone) 4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument 5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument. 6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument. 7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.) 8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems. I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless. NOTE: I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.
POLICY: RESPECT
—“…. largest problem is your obnoxious temperament … ”—
You mean my way of filtering intellectually dishonest, lazy, stupid people from wasting my (our) time? Of demanding you do some research and construct an argument before offering criticism? You mean, the way I demand respect, by requiring respect first? Or do you mean the way I prosecute pseudoscience, sophism, pilpul, critique, GSRRM?
I am not at all like my online personality. I have a job. that job requires certain things.I do my job.
ASK QUESTIONS DON”T OFFER CRITICISMS IN IGNORANCE.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:39:00 UTC