Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • SUPREME COURT, 9 TO 0, BANS POLICE FROM ASSET FORFEITURE. But up to 1/3 of polic

    SUPREME COURT, 9 TO 0, BANS POLICE FROM ASSET FORFEITURE.

    But up to 1/3 of police funding is from seizing assets.

    It doesn’t go far enough. It prohibits the egregious violations of the past. But it needs to prohibit it entirely. Either pay from the general fund or forget it.

    With police departments funded from seizures, fines, and tickets we have nothing but licensed corruption by organizations rather than individuals.

    I prefer the shakedowns I got in ukraine and russia thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 14:15:00 UTC

  • ALL RELIGION IS PREDICATED ON DEBT, WITH ONLY THE FIRST RELIGION (THE DEAD, NATU

    ALL RELIGION IS PREDICATED ON DEBT, WITH ONLY THE FIRST RELIGION (THE DEAD, NATURE) TRUE.

    THE LIE

    The Xian/Jian/Mian lies: false debt for false crime, with false promise of reward false reward.

    THE TRUTH

    1. The universe is in fact what enabled man.

    2. Ancestors are in fact what got us here.

    3. The only debts we owe are:

    – nature/planet/the universe. (in truth)

    – our ancestors, who made us possible (in truth)

    – exemplary ancestors who made us possible (with truth)

    – our peers who persist the gains of our ancestors. (in truth)

    WHY THE LIE

    All gods are lies by those lacking memory of worthy ancestors or worthy ancestors whatsoever.

    WE NEED NOT LIE

    We are the gods among men.

    And the fake gods were invented to undermine us.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 11:55:00 UTC

  • OUTSTANDING ISSUE So far the only outstanding argument is whether metaphysics ex

    OUTSTANDING ISSUE

    So far the only outstanding argument is whether metaphysics exist in the plural(languages) or singular (physics), and hopefully I will get to that one in the next week or so.

    But in general, you’re going to be wrong on ANY criticism of P. You’re going to be wrong on possibility of successful revolution under P. You are probably wrong on the desirability of the policies I’ve recommended under P. You might not be wrong on whether I am pitching the best government under P. You are most likely right that the demographics are such that we need ideology and religion in addition to law.

    I did my job. But please stop wasting my time.

    I mean all you (the idiots) are doing is proving my point that public speech should be limited to that under which due diligence has been performed.

    Because you’re no different than the enemy and their lies. Because you use the same technique as the enemy and their lies. Undermine western civilization because you are addicted to lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 11:03:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE AN ANSWER. —“…good men are starving for a real solution…”—Aaron

    WE HAVE AN ANSWER.

    —“…good men are starving for a real solution…”—Aaron Byrnes

    And yes, it’s hard to learn. Sorry.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 21:18:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098693541599993858

  • Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling

    Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling them the truth that they intuit but can’t put into words. That’s the ‘thrill’ of learning P.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 21:13:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098692160172376064

  • How much of this bs would disappear if we returned to judicial duelling? That’s

    How much of this bs would disappear if we returned to judicial duelling?

    That’s why I want to return to judicial duelling.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 17:58:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098643157456105472

  • WE HAVE AN ANSWER. —“…good men are starving for a real solution…”—Aaron

    WE HAVE AN ANSWER.

    —“…good men are starving for a real solution…”—Aaron Byrnes

    And yes, it’s hard to learn. Sorry.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:18:00 UTC

  • Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling

    Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling them the truth that they intuit but can’t put into words. That’s the ‘thrill’ of learning P.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:13:00 UTC

  • DON’T BE CHILDREN: She was preserving her option to influence the debate, by avo

    DON’T BE CHILDREN: She was preserving her option to influence the debate, by avoiding a he-said/she-said argument, and retaining focus on the human tragedy of war. Power is what it is in this world. No amount of ‘shallow honesty’ will fix it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 14:52:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098596288172576769

    Reply addressees: @sarahabed84 @TulsiGabbard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098391826791391233

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098391826791391233

  • REGARDING HOWE’S “DEBUNKING OF P” IN PLAIN SIGHT OVERVIEW SIMPLE VERSION FOR LIB

    REGARDING HOWE’S “DEBUNKING OF P”

    IN PLAIN SIGHT

    OVERVIEW

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

    SIMPLE VERSION FOR LIBERTARIANS

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/10/28/propertarianism-for-for-libertarians/

    SHORTCUTS

    –Testimonialism (2015)–

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/

    –Due Diligence (2015)–

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/06/04/due-diligence-necessary-for-the-warranty-of-truthfulness/

    –Propertarianism (2015)– https://propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

    –Propertarian Reasoning (2015) —

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/

    –Operationalism–

    Operationalism in historical context.

    http://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/

    –Natural Law–

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/29/a-short-course-in-natural-law/

    HERE IS WHAT IT APPEARS HOWE DID

    Asked a bunch of people to tell them verbal nonsense, or watched john mark’s videos, and didn’t actually do any research on the ~7000 posts i’ve written.

    Petty stupid nonsense. Made a hit piece in ignorance. I mean, is he stupid? Lazy and Ignorant? Fearful and Dishonest? All of the above?

    PROPERTARIANISM IS AN IQ TEST.

    If you can’t do it…. then you can’t do it.

    I mean. P is articulated well enough in the Overview for someone with education in economics and the philosophy of science to understand.

    —SO—

    Do I really answer this absurd ignorant straw man of Howe’s? Really, this guy doesn’t look up a definition of anything, he just makes shit up? Or goes by what someone tells him? I mean, I mean how much straw for this much straw manning.

    So far wrong on operationalism, wrong on ePrime, wrong on property, I mean this is… laughable…. I mean. It’s intellectually embarrassing.

    How can you invest this much time without just going thru the overview.

    Ok. So. This guy….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 12:21:00 UTC