Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • There are only three people on my “list”. I have no idea how many people’s list

    There are only three people on my “list”. I have no idea how many people’s list I am on.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 13:16:00 UTC

  • YOU CAN TAKE THE GIRL OUT OF THE GHETTO BUT NOT THE GHETTO OUT OF THE GIRL —“T

    YOU CAN TAKE THE GIRL OUT OF THE GHETTO BUT NOT THE GHETTO OUT OF THE GIRL

    —“The Duchess of Sussex has earned the nickname ‘Me-gain’ among Kensington Palace staff.”—

    YEP. Breeding. The lack of it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 13:07:00 UTC

  • It’s true. The left has the dumbest conspiracy theories. At least right wingers

    It’s true. The left has the dumbest conspiracy theories. At least right wingers are creative. lolz

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 10:51:00 UTC

  • You can’t REASON with them. They do not use reason. They can’t. It is against th

    You can’t REASON with them. They do not use reason. They can’t. It is against their reproductive interests which is why all leftism(equality) is lies kleptocracy, and dysgenics. Because rightism (aristocracy) is truth, reciprocity, and eugenics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 10:48:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54800060_10157071789092264_867406043

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54800060_10157071789092264_8674060434254331904_o_10157071789087264.jpg CONSTITUTION

    One Step Closer Every DayLan KenSent you a DM.Mar 25, 2019, 10:39 AMCONSTITUTION

    One Step Closer Every Day

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 10:23:00 UTC

  • TRINITIES, TRIPLETS, SERIES AND SPECTRA? —“Propertarians taking trinities seri

    TRINITIES, TRIPLETS, SERIES AND SPECTRA?

    —“Propertarians taking trinities seriously again. 😉 “—Brandon Hayes

    —“Easiest way to get over the left and right linear spectrum false dichotomy is to have a 3 point natural perception.”—Jeffery Gog Magog Hughes

    WHY?

    “it takes three points to test a line”

    “it takes three points (terms) to disambiguate a spectrum”

    “it takes three points (terms) to define lower bound, median, and upper bound.

    Once we have three points we can add precision between them without ambiguity that causes and permits conflation and therefore false inference from premises.

    Thats why

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 10:03:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55505696_10157071686842264_272509154

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55505696_10157071686842264_2725091547413479424_o_10157071686837264.jpg Now, if laws were constructed in this form and in operational language, (including the tests of reciprocity and limits as well) ….Steve PenderAlgorithmic law for eventual AI law enforcementMar 25, 2019, 9:57 AMJWarren PrescottAfter 30 years of writing, reading and using engineering specifications, I appreciate precise language. Engineering specs have to transfer complex information that must be understood by not just other engineers, but salesmen, expeditors, purchasing, inspectors and the craft. We have to take upper-tier specifications and create procedures, purchase orders and numerous other documents. There is a clear hierarchy and revisions to specifications supersede the previous revisions.

    Unfortunately, the current method used in writing the law is inherently irrational and confusing. It is a hodgepodge of overlapping statutory laws, regulations, procedures, ordinances that is all but impossible to unravel. It is as if lawyers created for themselves a system that excluded even the educated from logical discourse.

    For example, I can create a living trust in one state and it not be valid in another – because HOW it was written – by lawyers… But the same lawyers can (for a fee) reword the trust so it has the “right” words for their state. One would think that if the lawyers could interpret the original trust, a judge could.Mar 25, 2019, 10:26 AMAaron BradleyWhat a breath of fresh air…Mar 25, 2019, 5:43 PMNow, if laws were constructed in this form and in operational language, (including the tests of reciprocity and limits as well) ….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 09:30:00 UTC

  • See–here’s what the left did. Start with Upper class, middle class, under class

    See–here’s what the left did.

    Start with Upper class, middle class, under class. And then Class warfare, right? Then they replaced class warfare with patriarchy, women, minorities.

    So they view women as middle class, and minorities as underclass, and men as ruling class.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 16:50:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109860138876170240

  • US population density is only an asset as long as there is sufficient food, wate

    US population density is only an asset as long as there is sufficient food, water, and power to sustain it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 16:24:00 UTC

  • By Michael D. Abbott . Here’s what the left did. Start with Upper class, middle

    By Michael D. Abbott .

    Here’s what the left did.

    Start with Upper class, middle class, under class. And then Class warfare, right? Then they replaced class warfare with patriarchy, women, minorities.

    So they view women as middle class, and minorities as underclass, and men as ruling class.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 12:50:00 UTC