Monarchy, And The Common, Concurrent, Natural Law of Man, Nature, and Nature’s Gods We Imagine, And Aspire To Become. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-12 23:20:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745948872889782272
Form: Short Note
-
(FYI: Two people undermined me and my work. (a) Fuentes (b) Woods. Because they
(FYI: Two people undermined me and my work. (a) Fuentes (b) Woods. Because they inspired their legions from the island of dumb, loser, and misfit boys to saturate the social media space.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-12 20:18:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745903103163920445
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745890103573315740
-
Yes there are natural norms. As anyone who travels the world discoveres. or rath
Yes there are natural norms. As anyone who travels the world discoveres. or rather there are natural rules that produce a spectrum of norms in a given demographic composition in a given geography in a given civilization at a given level of development. In other words, the rules are the same, but the expression of them varies – because all ‘normal rules’ are negatives, but we immitate positives so we frame norms as positive particulars instead of negative universals – which is why people have ‘gotten ethics wrong’ for thousands of years. Ethics, like Science, Like Logic is entirely falsificationary (via negativa). We just imitate the positiva because it’s easier to understand and imitate – and moreover doesn’t ‘train’ us in what the negatives are, so we are less likely to explore them.
Reply addressees: @BrownCanard @Gundissemenator @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-12 18:00:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745868377896148992
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745854984401600812
-
This is his mistake because the source is the feminine intuition; the Abrahamic
This is his mistake because the source is the feminine intuition; the Abrahamic supernatural religions to advance it, and the reform into Marxist pseudoscientific religions to advance it further. The technique is feminine undermining and social construction accumulating in… https://t.co/pRuHKxw8cL
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-12 14:22:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745813490550391097
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745685916600148019
-
It is the product of the high trust society, and the high trust society above th
It is the product of the high trust society, and the high trust society above the Hajnal line. It is an extraordinary advantage IF you remain a homogenous polity. We didn’t. We presumed (foolishly) that other people’s would learn.
Most of them did until the jews came and put…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 19:00:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745521159125266934
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745503500342116643
-
FWIW: we should interpret the differences in synaptic density, the differences i
FWIW: we should interpret the differences in synaptic density, the differences in grey and white matter as evidence of the compartmentalization vs generalization of brain by sex difference.
Male fast narrow, female broad slow.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 18:58:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745520631049752631
Reply addressees: @Gundissemenator
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745516349764272301
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Apologies for the assumption and the implication. I should have chosen my words more carefully -which is an accident of doing too may things at once.
I am quite a ware of this research and much more of it – it’s one of my core competencies. And even then, this reserach does not tell us that women can’t be taught despite their intuitions. (religion is silly and non logical but we teach it.) However, that does not mean that there is no means of including women in political processes until … I am certain there is no means of doing so. 😉Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1745516349764272301
-
(Thoughts) Some of you chuckle at my disappontment over findings of the tragic a
(Thoughts)
Some of you chuckle at my disappontment over findings of the tragic and devastating consequences of women in the public sphere. But please forgive my continued effort to find some solution less objectionable – at least to me.
I wonder, it is increasingly clear that women are unsuitable in the main for judicial decisions, or decisions of consequence, but is that true of all matters public? Not all political questions are of responsibility but of priority. If they cannot manage responsibility then can they manage priority in some domains?
Not law. Not Politics. Not education. Not healthcare. What? At small scale they appear to do well.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 01:09:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745251434621288448
-
(Thoughts) Some of you chuckle ant my disappontment over findings of the tragic
(Thoughts)
Some of you chuckle ant my disappontment over findings of the tragic and devastating consequences of women in the public sphere. But please forgive my continued effort to find some solution less objectionable – at least to me.
I wonder, it is increasingly clear that women are unsuitable in the main for judicial decisions, or decisions of consequence, but is that true of all matters public? Not all political questions are of responsibility but of priority. If they cannot manage responsibility then can they manage priority in some domains?
Not law. Not Politics. Not education. Not healthcare. What? At small scale they appear to do well.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 01:09:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745241361710784512
-
(Thoughts) Continuing my march through the remaining literature on legal philoso
(Thoughts)
Continuing my march through the remaining literature on legal philosophy, presently with “Mere Natural Law” by Arkes, and struck yet again to see another example where Justice Kagan is unable to comprehend a most basic understanding of and use of legal reasoning beyond her limited intuitions. This woman is not only unfit for the high court, but unfit for any court other than maybe traffic court at best.
Unfortunately, as much as I respect Justice Barrett who seems to go with the flow of the other conservative justices, the more I study the judicial record, the common problem we have seen in Ginsberg’s willingless to legislate from thee bench aside, it’s increasinly clear that women have no place in the judiciary even if it appears they are of more than adquate value in as attorneys.
This is yet another disappontment – a truth I do not wish to know, nor discuss, nor encode into the law despite it’s necessity.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 00:19:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745239090272903168
-
I read two books yesterday. One from Jones on the evolution of the concept of lo
I read two books yesterday. One from Jones on the evolution of the concept of logos. And one on the philosophy of law.
If you learn The Work – which takes time, but I’m no longer convinced it’s that hard – almost every work of thought in history reads as, and feels, amaturish, and almost silly by comparison. Word games.
The philosophy of law is S4!t really. Starting with Bentham and Austin it’s offensive, and by the time we get to Rez, Kelsen, Hart, Dworkin, and Rawls it isn’t even law any longer. It’s RULE.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 17:23:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745134356706852864